- Mar 1, 2010
- 24,725
- 18,103
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Whilst i do agree with you in parts there are players like Menadue that have come on to be really good players and some stars
Grimes very similar build to menadue , I think its more about the way the player reads the ball and play and how much of a footballer he is (IQ)
Menadue is bigger / faster & Stronger than a player like stack in his 1st year or similar size to Stephenson from pies but just doesnt have that footballer instinct and looks timid. Love for him to just grow some B**** and get agro and play the game like he did as a 17 year old
I did not think Grimes was a lighter player around draft time significantly. However, Grimes was picked up at the backend of procedures from us thankfully.
The point is later pick less risk.
So my approach is not exclude categorically just on comparative weightings(no pun intended) have others ahead.
There is light and then there is real light to.
Deledio was not real light, probably light side of average. Menadue, Jack Martin, Fiora, and David Bourke where real light.
Day is not absolutely real light but when factoring in height and his leg muscle/density he is on the pretty much on the real lightish side. I cannot remember Fyfe at draft time but was he that light?? The hips are important, and the frame is important, and why I do not necessarily subscribe to Mathews necessarily he did like larger bumbs
For me I have 3 players at lest determined as second rounders before Day at RFC's first pick based on his lightness.
If Day's footage was exceptional it may sway me but for me I can see prospects just as exciting without the risk available before Day so I pick them on my criteria.
The thing with light players, its not just about muscle, bone growth, density and size become relevant in terms of frame I think
Last edited: