List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency - Fred 11

What Picks Will Richmond Get For Baker Bolton & Rioli


  • Total voters
    199
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
as above - when we, and the others, push for two matches each against the big Vic clubs, something has to change. When teams are allowed to send preferences for who they play, traditional fixtures etc., there's always fallout from that.

Leave the tin hat bullshit for Twitter.

Richmond has had less than AFL average amount of matches againsnt the other big 4 clubs in the last 4 seasons.

So how about you find some facts and base your claims on those rather than making up rubbish and then inferring posters who are presentig facts are low grade conspiracy theorists.
 
Last edited:
Arnold Schwarzenegger Reaction GIF
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Richmond has had less than AFL average amount of matches againsnt the other big 4 clubns in the last 4 seasons.

So how about you find some facts and base your claims on those rather than making up rubbish and then inferring posters who are presentig facts are low grade conspiracy theorists.
I still can’t believe Coll are guaranteed 2 x games v blues and ess EVERY year , no flipping wonder their crowds are no 1. Most years , that’s a min 70 plus 4 x
 
I still can’t believe Coll are guaranteed 2 x games v blues and ess EVERY year , no flipping wonder their crowds are no 1. Most years , that’s a min 70 plus 4 x
yet we are the only club to ever outdraw them in history while both top 4
 
Remember the outrage by some when we overlooked Tom Scully a couple of years ago? I just saw that he was delisted by Port this week....
 
Remember the outrage by some when we overlooked Tom Scully a couple of years ago? I just saw that he was delisted by Port this week....
Yes that was discussed significantly but most thought he was soft and not competitive enough
Harry Lemmy was the one most including myself wanted and were furious that we Lemmy was taken with #47 just 2 picks before our #49
 
Yes that was discussed significantly but most thought he was soft and not competitive enough
Harry Lemmy was the one most including myself wanted and were furious that we Lemmy was taken with #47 just 2 picks before our #49
Lemmy's even softer.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remember the outrage by some when we overlooked Tom Scully a couple of years ago? I just saw that he was delisted by Port this week....
I wanted him, he’d kicked big bags of goals in the juniors and was going to be available with our later picks

Was always a huge question mark if he’d be able to get enough size onto his frame though
 
Liar you were a fan
Like **** I was.

 
There are 9 senior list spots available but 1 will need to be filled by an elevated rookie

View attachment 2151491


Thanks for doing this. So in theory we go into the draft able to pick 9 players but likely go with 6, trade 2 picks out on the night for first rounders next year, then promote off the rookie list 1 player so we can still have one pick in the rookie draft and one in the SSP.

That seems to be our strategy each year in terms of keeping spots open.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top