List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency Part 10

Remove this Banner Ad

Picks : 1-6-9-10-14-20-21-22 would be the best result & not wasting any by trading up to #2 o#3 unless Baker was involved. Hopefully we can get the following;

Fos
Jagga
Ried
Armstrong
Gross
Berry
Faull
I'd be gutted if we gave up picks 6 & 9 for pick 2.

If you went to the North board with that, i bet they would jump at it, if a side is jumping at it then that means we are getting bent over.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Im not seeing a Dusty or a Dangerfield not even a JUH , JHF , Reid or even a Dyson Sharp in the top 10 this year and any player could be the best of the draft

Take our picks and dont bother trading up and trust the recruiters to pick the eyes out and build depth
They get paid to pick the best player and we have pick #1 so do the work
This.
I'd be gutted if we gave up picks 6 & 9 for pick 2.

If you went to the North board with that, i bet they would jump at it, if a side is jumping at it then that means we are getting bent over.
Also this.
 
I get we all think this draft is super even, but maybe the club thinks there are 3 guns to be had, and after that it gets even?

The club better be bloody right then. My fear is this isn't a super draft, just an even draft and we are getting conned into who we think is top 5.
 
If that’s the case, and I don’t think we have 10 No.3 chances this year & 14 months away is a long time off, then trading up in 2025 would be much more expensive then it will be this year. Logically.

Teams who trade up usually win the deal.

As always, price vs value, but if we want to, happy to assess when we see the deal(s).
Plus, before we do any trading int next yr, we need to know what the rules around the draft will be.
 
I couldnt find that, appears they must have traded some? Could be wrong.
Shock, horror: you are.

In 2011, GWS had picks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14.
In 2012 they had 1, 2, 3, 12, 14.

These were all picks they used at the draft.
 
I couldnt find that, appears they must have traded some? Could be wrong.

2010 gold coast:

1725955950768.png

2011 gws: (note cos of entry concessions, o'meara & brad crouch were selected from a "mini-draft", gws had to trade picks for players and couldn't use them themselves or w/e)

1725956040996.png

2012: gws

1725956101692.png


also jack martin + jess hogan were "mini drafters" (entry concessions) in 2012
 
We start with 1 // 21, 29 // 39, 41 // 49, 58, 65

Brisbane's pick 14 (assuming they lose) is actually going to be pick 16 (after Ashcroft and Lombard bids), so any points discussions should be based on it being pick 16. I know there's other NGA / F/S picks around the 15-30 mark, but let's assume that only those 2 bids get matched. All picks from ~3 onwards get pushed out by 1, and by ~7 onwards by 2.

24 for Graham via FA
7 and 22 for Rioli (with us paying part of 2 years salary)
11, 12, and 17 for Bolton and 22 (with us paying part of 2 years salary)
4 and 26 for Baker, 12, and 31

We then have 1, 4, 7, 11, 17 // 23, 24, 26 // 39, 41 // 49, 58, 65

16 (1067) from Brisbane for 26, 39, 41, 58 (1757). If they can't turn pick 26 into more points from other teams, they should be stripped of a license. Melbourne could easily give them the points they need (have 38, 46, 50)

We then have 1, 4, 7, 11, 16, 17 // 23, 24 // 49, 65

Can trade 23/24 to teams for future 1sts (Melbourne would be top of my list)

Can use 49 (will come in about 5 picks after bid matching) as well as our PSD Pick 1 to trade in fringe players from other teams; Nathan O'Driscoll, Konstanty, Stone, Bond, Fahey, Serong, etc.

Upgrade Bauer with 65

Finish with 1, 4, 7, 11, 16, 17
Plus 2 future 1sts
Plus 2 quality fringe players in the 20-25 age bracket
If we are paying 2 yrs of Rioli's salary, 22 isn't the 2nd pick we are taking in that deal.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Heating the club are really trying hard to work deals out for 2 and 3.
If true, Morro you can stop stressing about me belting ya

Come On Reaction GIF by Bayerischer Rundfunk
 
If we're the only buyers - or the only ones with a pick Norf need (6), we hopefully won't have to give them 9, but a later pick.
I think that we'd have to pay overs for 2 and for that reason it's a no from me, They'll more than likely take a tall at 2 as they're desperate for KPP's, and the reasoning for them to trade 2 is to get 2 x talls, we're better off keeping those picks and doing what they want to do.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Trade & Free Agency Part 10

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top