The one Geelong has is after it's first pick. In say 2014 when half Geelong's list has retired it could be anything up to pick no.2
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Trade Hypotheticals
- Thread starter adam10
- Start date
- Tagged users None
The one Geelong has is after it's first pick. In say 2014 when half Geelong's list has retired it could be anything up to pick no.2
- Apr 18, 2005
- 31,408
- 27,360
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Bate & Warnock to Brisbane, Fevola to Fremantle, Clark to Melbourne.
Brisbane give: Fevola + Clark + 4th rounder
Brisbane get: Bate & Warnock + 2nd rounder + 3rd rounder
Fremantle give: 3rd Rounder
Fremantle get: Fevola
Melbourne give: Bate & Warnock + 2nd rounder
Melboune get: Clark + 4th rounder
Bate & Warnock to Brisbane, Fevola to Fremantle, Clark to Melbourne.
Brisbane give: Fevola + Clark + 4th rounder
Brisbane get: Bate & Warnock + 2nd rounder + 3rd rounder
Fremantle give: 3rd Rounder
Fremantle get: Fevola
Melbourne give: Bate & Warnock + 2nd rounder
Melboune get: Clark + 4th rounder
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Please change the team name under where it says 'yellow card' on your profile That is an embarrassing trade.
Jesus Baulks
Cancelled
- Apr 11, 2011
- 1,816
- 2
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #479
- Apr 18, 2005
- 31,408
- 27,360
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Are you kidding? We get Clark for Bate and Warnock, lose a second round pick and get a fourth round pick. Warnock wont get another game with Rivers, Garland and Frawley in the side, it's pretty much Bate and a second rounder for Clark (proven foward/ruck that can switch with Jamar) and a fourth rounder that could be anything. Id be happy.
Are you kidding? We get Clark for Bate and Warnock, lose a second round pick and get a fourth round pick. Warnock wont get another game with Rivers, Garland and Frawley in the side, it's pretty much Bate and a second rounder for Clark (proven foward/ruck that can switch with Jamar) and a fourth rounder that could be anything. Id be happy.
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Bahahaha! Cannot begin to explain what is wrong with that..
Melbourne highway robbery.. Pity Clark said its freo or bust
Bahahaha! Cannot begin to explain what is wrong with that..
Melbourne highway robbery.. Pity Clark said its freo or bust
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Seriously? Your packaging up 2 spuds with a 2nd rounder in a shit draft and expect Clark & a pick? Bate and Warnock are worthless in a trade like this. Your using them as the main part of it. Unless u think pick 36 is the major part of a deal for a KPF/Ruck?
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
And if Fevola goes anywhere (unlikely) it will be a Melbourne club in the draft
Bahahaha! Cannot begin to explain what is wrong with that..
Melbourne highway robbery.. Pity Clark said its freo or bust
And if Fevola goes anywhere (unlikely) it will be a Melbourne club in the draft
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
BTW came to read rumours not some crack-pot hypothetical.
BTW came to read rumours not some crack-pot hypothetical.
- Apr 18, 2005
- 31,408
- 27,360
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
?? That second rounder could be anything mate, even in a weak draft. Gems pop out of anywhere. Brisbane get another defender and a stronger bodied H/F / Midfielder and a selection. We get Clark and a fourth round pick in a 'weak' draft.
?? That second rounder could be anything mate, even in a weak draft. Gems pop out of anywhere. Brisbane get another defender and a stronger bodied H/F / Midfielder and a selection. We get Clark and a fourth round pick in a 'weak' draft.
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Of course you're happy, that trade offer was a steaming pile of shit, and a heavily weighted one at that.
Of course you're happy, that trade offer was a steaming pile of shit, and a heavily weighted one at that.
- Apr 18, 2005
- 31,408
- 27,360
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Well then fill us in champ, we certainly wont be trading Bate for pick 39 like you mob offered up, we know if we offload him we want something decent.
Still ignoring the bleeding obvious huh?
Well then fill us in champ, we certainly wont be trading Bate for pick 39 like you mob offered up, we know if we offload him we want something decent.
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
It's effectively Bate + 2nd rounder for Clark ..
Brisbane knocked back #16 and #20 for him, why would they take that shit?
Oh and I think you're refusing to accept Clark has said its Fremantle or bust... He rejected Melbourne the other day. Melbourne fired their shot
But wait, demondavey wants to offer up a list clogger who cannot get a game for Melbourne, for him.. Deal
And like I said before, glad our offer was rejected.. Guy is a spud.. To suggest he is worth a 1st rounder is more than laughable.. You can keep your shit thanks
It's effectively Bate + 2nd rounder for Clark ..
Brisbane knocked back #16 and #20 for him, why would they take that shit?
Oh and I think you're refusing to accept Clark has said its Fremantle or bust... He rejected Melbourne the other day. Melbourne fired their shot
But wait, demondavey wants to offer up a list clogger who cannot get a game for Melbourne, for him.. Deal
And like I said before, glad our offer was rejected.. Guy is a spud.. To suggest he is worth a 1st rounder is more than laughable.. You can keep your shit thanks
Clark is Freo bound in my opinion, no matter what.
What about this Caddy trade?
Essendon get: Caddy, 32
GC Suns get: Dempsey, 19
Dempsey is originally a Queensland boy and would really love the oppourtunity to be in his home state again. Caddy helps the Bombers' midfield, while 18 could gat a decent type of player the Suns need.
What about this Caddy trade?
Essendon get: Caddy, 32
GC Suns get: Dempsey, 19
Dempsey is originally a Queensland boy and would really love the oppourtunity to be in his home state again. Caddy helps the Bombers' midfield, while 18 could gat a decent type of player the Suns need.
- Apr 18, 2005
- 31,408
- 27,360
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Ah get stuffed mate. I haven't been paying a hell of a lot of attention cause i have been interstate all week. Not in Brisbane mind you
So suffice to say i am just having a bit of a laugh, and goosing about a bit. Trying to throw a bit in there to keep blokes like you thinking
Brisbane would get two players and two selections though? Is Bate REALLY that bad? And Warnock has certainly shown he can play as a defender, he is no Matthew Scarlett but he aint all washed up? Two picks?? For a guy who might just walk into the preseason draft??
Maybe i just reckon the ruck duo of Clark and Jamar would rival Cox and Nic Nat!!!!!!!! BLINKERS!!!!
Don't take it so seriously sunshine
It's effectively Bate + 2nd rounder for Clark ..
Brisbane knocked back #16 and #20 for him, why would they take that shit?
Oh and I think you're refusing to accept Clark has said its Fremantle or bust... He rejected Melbourne the other day. Melbourne fired their shot
But wait, demondavey wants to offer up a list clogger who cannot get a game for Melbourne, for him.. Deal
And like I said before, glad our offer was rejected.. Guy is a spud.. To suggest he is worth a 1st rounder is more than laughable.. You can keep your shit thanks
Ah get stuffed mate. I haven't been paying a hell of a lot of attention cause i have been interstate all week. Not in Brisbane mind you
So suffice to say i am just having a bit of a laugh, and goosing about a bit. Trying to throw a bit in there to keep blokes like you thinking
Brisbane would get two players and two selections though? Is Bate REALLY that bad? And Warnock has certainly shown he can play as a defender, he is no Matthew Scarlett but he aint all washed up? Two picks?? For a guy who might just walk into the preseason draft??
Maybe i just reckon the ruck duo of Clark and Jamar would rival Cox and Nic Nat!!!!!!!! BLINKERS!!!!
Don't take it so seriously sunshine
So virtually a straight swap between Caddy and Dempsey with a 10 pick upgrade in the 20s of a weakish draft.
Take away the 32 and it's closer to the mark although would only work if Caddy nominates Essendon imo.
Obviously you don't rate Dempsey.
Just becuase someone has an 'okay' year doesn't mean they aren't that good anymore, but you're right, maybe take away the 32.
Re: MaCaffer to Tigers for Graham + Pick
Clark is Freo bound, no matter what. He even said yesterday, it's Freo or bust, when rejecting Melbourne's best offer:
[URL="http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/125117/default.aspx[/URL]
Warnock for Brisbane's 4th rounder seems ok (if I read your original post correctly)
But that Bate deal is a fair wank.. And why was Freo involved exactly? Getting Fevola (who as I said is extremely unlikely to be traded for) and helping Melbourne get a player they want desperately.
All this, in addition to the fact Freo offered picks 16 and 20 and were rejected. Your offer is far beneath that.
Ah get stuffed mate. I haven't been paying a hell of a lot of attention cause i have been interstate all week. Not in Brisbane mind you
So suffice to say i am just having a bit of a laugh, and goosing about a bit. Trying to throw a bit in there to keep blokes like you thinking
Brisbane would get two players and two selections though? Is Bate REALLY that bad? And Warnock has certainly shown he can play as a defender, he is no Matthew Scarlett but he aint all washed up? Two picks?? For a guy who might just walk into the preseason draft??
Maybe i just reckon the ruck duo of Clark and Jamar would rival Cox and Nic Nat!!!!!!!! BLINKERS!!!!
Don't take it so seriously sunshine
Clark is Freo bound, no matter what. He even said yesterday, it's Freo or bust, when rejecting Melbourne's best offer:
[URL="http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/125117/default.aspx[/URL]
Warnock for Brisbane's 4th rounder seems ok (if I read your original post correctly)
But that Bate deal is a fair wank.. And why was Freo involved exactly? Getting Fevola (who as I said is extremely unlikely to be traded for) and helping Melbourne get a player they want desperately.
All this, in addition to the fact Freo offered picks 16 and 20 and were rejected. Your offer is far beneath that.
HurleyTheFuture
Club Legend
Im an essendon supporter and I agreeObviously you don't rate Dempsey.
Just becuase someone has an 'okay' year doesn't mean they aren't that good anymore, but you're right, maybe take away the 32.
Take away the 32
Add Jenkins, Dempsey and 19
or 19, Dempsey and Brisbanes Compo pick as discussed already
Give brisbane Lonergan and 41
Just some ideas
And would only work if he nominated Essendon
Now that other clubs now we are after him I hope they dont try and get him
But Id give it a 1/10 chance of happening
Not true, I don't mind him.Obviously you don't rate Dempsey.
Just becuase someone has an 'okay' year doesn't mean they aren't that good anymore, but you're right, maybe take away the 32.
Just don't think he and their first rounder would be enough to secure Caddy thats all.
Eth
For sale
I would say Dempsey and P19 to GC for Caddy and P50. Same trade, just benefits the Suns a bit more.
V good trade for essendon
Blue and Silver
Brownlow Medallist
How about Lucas, Bower and 22 for Caddy and GC's third rounder (49?50?).
Caddy's just what Carlton need in the middle, a big bustling clearance mid. Happily give up quality mid (Lucas), risky but talented KPP (Bower) and low first(22) for a guy like that. Something tells me that a Richmond etc. would trump it though. GC deserves more than Carlton can offer TBH (A top ten pick) and what we do have, while equivalent together may not be the most attractive package
Caddy's just what Carlton need in the middle, a big bustling clearance mid. Happily give up quality mid (Lucas), risky but talented KPP (Bower) and low first(22) for a guy like that. Something tells me that a Richmond etc. would trump it though. GC deserves more than Carlton can offer TBH (A top ten pick) and what we do have, while equivalent together may not be the most attractive package
Similar threads
