Trade rumour/innuendo/fact/fiction MKIII

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would you have said this before the new sub rule came in, just out of curiosity? Carlton supporters seem to think Richmond are our only threat if Jacobs goes into the PSD, but I didn't really think your ruck stocks were all that bad?

For sure. TBH, I am not a massive rap for Jacobs - had a decent final, but other than that has failed to dazzle. He'd help, but I'd rather Ivan Maric
 
Would not give up Foley for pick 8 unless his body is ****ed!

Thats what you dont get... if his body is ****ed, l'm happy to take pick 40. Pick 40 is worth more than a bloke that wont play ever again.

:rolleyes:

FWIW... l'm open to trading Foley. At the right price. Havent had him for 2 years, to me, expendable.

;)
 

Log in to remove this ad.

tune into tradeweek radio just said houli to tigers deal is close to completion.
tune in there are talking about houli
 
tune into tradeweek radio just said houli to tigers deal is close to completion.
tune in there are talking about houli

wallace just said richmond should offer pick 63 :thumbsu:
if they do not accept go to the ND

edit: hutchy said pick 29 for grigg and richmond wont offer anything higher than a pick in the 30'sor houli
 
So, what is the gut feel with Grigg over here guys? Will a deal be struck, or are Carlton as delusional about his worth as Jacobs? Also, I want to clear something up. If Jacobs entered the PSD (without Grigg), would you guys pick him up if he had a $350k contract per year over his head? If Grigg entered aswell, would he be the first preference over Jacobs? Basically, is there a need for him at your club?

AS much as clubs try to get the upper hand in deals there still seems to an element of fair play generally. Most people understand what goes around comes around.

Adelaide have given us a very good trade for tambling. Jacobs want adelaide and adelaide want him. Richmond want griggs and griggs wants them. I doubt we would shit on Adelaide by taking Jacobs ahead of grigg in the PSD if they were both there.

In the unlikely event we traded for both griggs and houli I still doubt we would pick Jacobs in the PSD unless he actually wanted to come to richmond.
 
DT said Foley was floated for the second Ablett pick.... Not sure who suggested it though.

I love Axel, but we'd have to listen if Dons wanted to talk pick 8 and something else decent

Are you off your head... if they offer us pick 8, we should walk away slowly and then do a bolt, occasionally turning back just to give them this:

flipping-the-bird.jpg
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DT said Foley was floated for the second Ablett pick.... Not sure who suggested it though.

I love Axel, but we'd have to listen if Dons wanted to talk pick 8 and something else decent

Wouldn't surprise me if it were true, we clearly need that type of midfielder, and Wells clearly said yesterday that we had presented a number of scenarios to other clubs involving swapping the picks for a player or players. Having said that, so much of the stuff you hear this trade week you have to take with a grain of salt.
 
wallace just said richmond should offer pick 63 :thumbsu:
if they do not accept go to the ND

edit: hutchy said pick 29 for grigg and richmond wont offer anything higher than a pick in the 30'sor houli

This certainly sounds a bit rich. Put this into perspective.
-Adam Thomson Pick 11 played 28 games in 4 years traded to richmond for pick 42 we payed overs and he is being delisted.
-Shaun Grigg Pick 19 played 25 games in 4 years suggested trade value 29.
-Bachar Houli Pick 42 played 25 games in 4 years suggested trade value 30s.
All players are midfielders in mediocre teams.

....We shouldn't be offering more than pick 50 otherwise we shouldn't be trading for them.
 
For sure. TBH, I am not a massive rap for Jacobs - had a decent final, but other than that has failed to dazzle. He'd help, but I'd rather Ivan Maric
Really? Try explaining this to Carlton supporters, it is like teaching the times tables to 3 year olds. He is a Dean Cox clone apparantley Jacobs.
 
Wouldn't surprise me if it were true, we clearly need that type of midfielder, and Wells clearly said yesterday that we had presented a number of scenarios to other clubs involving swapping the picks for a player or players. Having said that, so much of the stuff you hear this trade week you have to take with a grain of salt.


Would you take it? If you offered us the compo pick that was given to you - the one that you can use directly after your first round selection... if we take that, does that mean its pick 7 if we use it this year?

Where do l sign?
 
AS much as clubs try to get the upper hand in deals there still seems to an element of fair play generally. Most people understand what goes around comes around.

Adelaide have given us a very good trade for tambling. Jacobs want adelaide and adelaide want him. Richmond want griggs and griggs wants them. I doubt we would shit on Adelaide by taking Jacobs ahead of grigg in the PSD if they were both there.

In the unlikely event we traded for both griggs and houli I still doubt we would pick Jacobs in the PSD unless he actually wanted to come to richmond.
Cheers mate.:thumbsu: It is refreshing to read something like this after having to put up with Carlton supporters for 2 weeks.
 
Would you take it? If you offered us the compo pick that was given to you - the one that you can use directly after your first round selection... if we take that, does that mean its pick 7 if we use it this year?

Where do l sign?

Well UTG said the rumour the second Ablett pick, which is the one you can't use this year (even though it's pick 11, AFL loves GC so much that they won't let it be pick 11 this year), which obviously wouldn't get the deal done, though it might start a discussion.

As to the "first pick" which you are right is pick 7, are you asking me would I offer it? Depends largely on the medical to be honest, but I'd consider it. Whether the club would or not though is another matter, they might differ grweatly from my opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top