MRP / Trib. Tribunal Thread - rules and offences discombobulation

Remove this Banner Ad

Now he is trying to use SPPs own words of "all his force" to bring McEvoy down against him
Yeah. Like we now expect footballers to use only 50% of their available force in tackling. Each player will be baselined to make sure no tackles go over this. Either that or a "tackle" is to be effected by ripping a velcro tag off a player's shorts. Gently.
 
If this conviction stands, which it absolutely can’t, then god help any more tacklers in the future.
Pandora’s box.
Football will become a quandary of "do I pick the ball up and get called for htb" or "do I tackle and get suspended".

For Ports anyway.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If this conviction stands, which it absolutely can’t, then god help any more tacklers in the future.
Pandora’s box.
not really

The AFL clearly dont use any kind of precedent so they will just move on and the next bloke who does worse than SPP will get nothing but a fine
 
Mr Gleeson delivering closing remarks on behalf of the AFL "You don't need to be satisfied this tackle both finished and started as a dangerous tackle ... the problem with the tackle was how it finished up."

LOL and you think Krupka is a dodo

It should be thrown out just on this piss weak closing remark
Gleeson tends to go hard at the players especially when fists and bumps are involved, almost personal.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bottom comments are first.

Mr Krupka is walking the panel through 14 still images from Powell-Pepper's tackle on McEvoy.

Mr Krupka: There's nothing wrong with the technique. The only reason I showed you Neal-Bullen is because I wanted to show you what a true sling tackle is.

.....
Mr Krupka is now showing Alex Neal-Bullen's tackle on Will Hamill, the first incident that was brought before the Tribunal under the revised sling tackle guidelines introduced during the year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. Tribunal Thread - rules and offences discombobulation

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top