Big Slam
Debutant
- Aug 9, 2020
- 149
- 182
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Zach Reid will not make it as a player and will play under 50 games of AFL football for Essendon.
^
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Zach Reid will not make it as a player and will play under 50 games of AFL football for Essendon.
Yes god what do you want by bumping your own post, yes agreed, super unpopular opinion
Yes god what do you want by bumping your own post, yes agreed, super unpopular opinion
Also lazy.
The brave opinion would be that Zach will play 200 games and be a star
Let's cut to the chase.Langford will join Heppell as outside our best side by the end of next season.
Unfortunately for us injuries, poor development but also a lack of consistency has meant Kyle isn't where he should be as a player for us.
The club just signed him to a long contract, when they could have got a FA pick for him this year. He is part of the long-term plans.Let's cut to the chase.
Langford is trade bait.
That belongs in the 'Unpopular Facts' thread.The club just signed him to a long contract, when they could have got a FA pick for him this year. He is part of the long-term plans.
That’s not unpopular, just wildly unlikely.Darcy Parish will be turn into a tackling and two way running machine next season. And with the inclusion of Tsatas, Parish could likely change roles from a mid/forward to a defensive midfielder.
Either way, he will be elite, go close to winning the BnF, and fans won't want to lose him in free agency.
So it's unpopular then?That’s not unpopular, just wildly unlikely.
I would of offered him as part of the Dunkley deal.Let's cut to the chase.
Langford is trade bait.
In 2020?I would of offered him as part of the Dunkley deal.
Yeah, not sure Kyle was under contract but I would of asked him if he was open to the move.In 2020?
yeah - it’s 2020 hindsightIn 2020?
Why would the Bulldogs have wanted him? He wouldn’t get a game in their best 22.I would of offered him as part of the Dunkley deal.
He was out of contract end of 2020. He loves the club, he had a good offer from a recent premiership winner to move in free agency and he wanted to stay.Yeah, not sure Kyle was under contract but I would of asked him if he was open to the move.
Who knows, maybe we did and he wasn't interested.
Laverde is very skilful, courageous and disciplined and will thrive once we have two actual, proper key defenders3 year extension for Laverde was ridiculous
Here’s an unpopular opinion - I would have traded AMT as part of the Dunkley deal or even for a draft pick.I would of offered him as part of the Dunkley deal.
He needs metal legs. eth-dogCox has the strongest ankles in the AFL he's just that powerful that they cannot withstand him.
I floated this at the time - I would have done it.Here’s an unpopular opinion - I would have traded AMT as part of the Dunkley deal or even for a draft pick.