he was the tallest man on the ground, i'm not surprised he got so much of the pillhttp://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/2013-06-10/eagles-shine-in-wafl
"while McGovern had 122 touches and six marks for the Tigers."
McGovern vs everyone? Lulz
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 7 - Pride Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
he was the tallest man on the ground, i'm not surprised he got so much of the pillhttp://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/2013-06-10/eagles-shine-in-wafl
"while McGovern had 122 touches and six marks for the Tigers."
McGovern vs everyone? Lulz
That's been a pet peeve of mine all year, there has been so many players doing in...running forward looking for the easy kick rather than putting on the block. S Selwood had one or two on the weekend, which is unlike him.
On Embley, the only role he plays well now is the seagull, and that only works well when we are playing well and he can play without accountability.
http://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/2013-06-10/eagles-shine-in-wafl
"while McGovern had 122 touches and six marks for the Tigers."
McGovern vs everyone? Lulz
Does anyone remember when the players asked for more one on one coaching from Woosha, other than the assistants, the year we got the wooden spoon, could this be occurring again?In my honest opinion is that Woosha's messages aren't getting thru to the playing group anymore as simple as that , I think Woosha has lost the passion from everything I see
Why is it ridiculous mate , as I have said he is playing under extreme pressure just like Ebert did and look at Ebert now he has a full time gig at Port , think about it mate.....Ridiculous mindset.
Let's play a guy for the rest of the season not because he deserves it, but to see if he deserves it.
http://www.westcoasteagles.com.au/news/2013-06-10/eagles-shine-in-wafl
"while McGovern had 122 touches and six marks for the Tigers."
McGovern vs everyone? Lulz
He is still a spud.Why is it ridiculous mate , as I have said he is playing under extreme pressure just like Ebert did and look at Ebert now he has a full time gig at Port , think about it mate.....
No tackles, delist.
I don't get it?I always suspected Thorne89 was really Gary Stocks.
Why is it ridiculous mate , as I have said he is playing under extreme pressure just like Ebert did and look at Ebert now he has a full time gig at Port , think about it mate.....
It's ridiculous to say that you should give extended time in the side to someone because that's the only way they're going to play good footy.
How about they play good footy in the first place when given a go and force the match committee to drop someone else instead?
It's the same argument people have been making for years on this board. They said the same about Swift and he couldn't hack it. The same is said about Ash Smith yet why should we give an extended run to someone who's such a liability?
We're not a team that can afford to play (at most) 21 and a half men each week.
Simple fact is that Dalziell is filler for our side. When someone is injured, he gets a run. If he was a gun then Brisbane wouldn't have been so quick to trade him in a straight swap for Brent Staker.
It's ridiculous to say that you should give extended time in the side to someone because that's the only way they're going to play good footy.
How about they play good footy in the first place when given a go and force the match committee to drop someone else instead?
It's the same argument people have been making for years on this board. They said the same about Swift and he couldn't hack it. The same is said about Ash Smith yet why should we give an extended run to someone who's such a liability?
We're not a team that can afford to play (at most) 21 and a half men each week.
Simple fact is that Dalziell is filler for our side. When someone is injured, he gets a run. If he was a gun then Brisbane wouldn't have been so quick to trade him in a straight swap for Brent Staker.
It's ridiculous to say that you should give extended time in the side to someone because that's the only way they're going to play good footy.
How about they play good footy in the first place when given a go and force the match committee to drop someone else instead?
It's the same argument people have been making for years on this board. They said the same about Swift and he couldn't hack it. The same is said about Ash Smith yet why should we give an extended run to someone who's such a liability?
We're not a team that can afford to play (at most) 21 and a half men each week.
Simple fact is that Dalziell is filler for our side. When someone is injured, he gets a run. If he was a gun then Brisbane wouldn't have been so quick to trade him in a straight swap for Brent Staker.
So we should keep playing players with runs on the board, not matter how far past it they are, because younger players haven't proven themselves at AFL? That's not how player development works. Kids can play as many WAFL games as they like, but they won't fully develop without extended time at AFL, and yes, sometimes you have to give them those games even when they don't 100% deserve it because of their potential.
They have to earn there spots but they have to deserve retention equally. Living on past glory is a horrible way to select a squad. Embley and Selwood especially are prime examples of guys that don't deserve to be retained.
Well we will have to see what happens when the new coach comes in next year hey
Sorry fellas, I understand your points and they make sense. Eagles 4 Mine, sorry if I came across heavy handed in my previous posts.
I just don't agree that someone like Bradd Dalziell (who ain't a spring chicken) should be given an extended run in the seniors to see if he's cut out for life in the AFL.
My thoughts are to give them a taste at the top level and if they play well enough to earn their spot for the next week, then keep them in the side. If not, send them back with the taste of the big time in their mouth, that way if they play well enough to get back into the seniors then they're going to want to fight as hard to make it impossible to be dropped.
Fanciful? Probably. I just don't like pumping games into inadequate players when we can't afford passengers. We've got a bloody tough run coming up and need to win as many games as possible - we can't afford to be playing players just so they can get the experience.
In my honest opinion is that Woosha's messages aren't getting thru to the playing group anymore as simple as that , I think Woosha has lost the passion from everything I see
Looking forward to seeing who out of our squad gets a run this week. Some big changes are in the air for the Hawthorn game so I think we'll get a good gauge from the players who play WAFL this week who is/isn't under consideration.
Sorry fellas, I understand your points and they make sense. Eagles 4 Mine, sorry if I came across heavy handed in my previous posts.
Fanciful? Probably. I just don't like pumping games into inadequate players when we can't afford passengers. We've got a bloody tough run coming up and need to win as many games as possible - we can't afford to be playing players just so they can get the experience.
Sorry fellas, I understand your points and they make sense. Eagles 4 Mine, sorry if I came across heavy handed in my previous posts.
I just don't agree that someone like Bradd Dalziell (who ain't a spring chicken) should be given an extended run in the seniors to see if he's cut out for life in the AFL.
My thoughts are to give them a taste at the top level and if they play well enough to earn their spot for the next week, then keep them in the side. If not, send them back with the taste of the big time in their mouth, that way if they play well enough to get back into the seniors then they're going to want to fight as hard to make it impossible to be dropped.
Fanciful? Probably. I just don't like pumping games into inadequate players when we can't afford passengers. We've got a bloody tough run coming up and need to win as many games as possible - we can't afford to be playing players just so they can get the experience.
Bring back RoJo ! Brennan can play this role - hope he gets a run with role on Birchall next game - Hutchings blocks and puts in some hard tackles every game, Kerr's not scared of anybody nomatter how big they are (but maybe not these days), McGinnity can be downright unsociable, and I think McGovern can be trained to play that way. These few can also handle being bashed up.It's not about the cattle, it's about mindset. Watch that last goal again and Embley (yes, he seems to be one of my favourite targets at the moment) just runs alongside, slightly forward, of Rosa looking for the handball over the top. He does not try to impede the Saints player running alongside him from getting to Rosa.
Doesn't need to be a snap in half shirtfront (admittedly my favourite) just a body in the way, block of some sort.
Brennan can play this role - hope he gets a run with role on Birchall next game