KermitJagger
Professional Thread Derailer
- May 17, 2017
- 16,364
- 53,580
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Top picks are still a bit hit and miss, but surely you agree that you are more likely to get a hit in 1 - 10, than you are 11 - 20, than 21 - 30, etc?
Taking 2003 as your example:
11 Beau Waters - 120 games - Compared to Cooney 250 games
12 Ryan Murphy - 48 games - Compared to Walker 202 games
13 Brent Stanton - 255 games - Compared to Sylvia 163 games
14 Fergus Watts - 6 games - Compared to Ray 209 games
15 Troy Chaplin - 215 games - Compared to McLean 157 games
16 Josh Willoughby - 0 games - Compared to Bradley 117 games
17 Billy Morrison - 0 games - Compared to Tenace 54 games
18 Llane Spaandeman - 3 games - Compared to Clarke 85 games
19 David Mundy - 299 games - Compared to Trotter 7 games
20 Sam Butler - 166 games - Compared to Dunn 8 games
Think the top 10s have it...
I can't find the main board thread where I crunched the numbers, but the gist of them were that top 10 picks will get you a reliably good player, but won't always get you star players. An equal amount of success came from later drafted players who were taken on potential by good sides, or ended up at good sides. This is because bottom sides will go for players that are likely to have an instant impact, and that doesn't always mean that they'll be the best players later in life, just that they're better players at 18 where they could simply be more developed.
I'm not saying that you should forego the idea of top pics always and forever, just that clubs do their research far enough out that they will know that in a certain draft they will have their eyes on a player that they will need top draft picks for. It's worth attacking the draft in a year like 2001, 2004 and in hindsight 2013, but amassing 1st rounders with no consideration to the quality of that draft year means you could have top 10 picks in a year like 2003.