It’s less of a comparison to Cyril, and more of a contrast to how good I believe Watson is as an athlete.Rioli was definitely stronger, quicker, more explosive and a better athlete in general. He was a very rare mix of those traits.
Edit: I didn't want to bring up the age thing as it could come across as condescending, when that's not my intention. But I see KermitJagger had addressed this too.
Physiclly Rioli could do things that no one else could, especially before his hammies had an impact. I'm not sure how you could really argue otherwise given you'd have been only a few years old when Rioli was drafted. Take it from those who were lucky enough to watch him every week.
Puopolo is a better comparison, albeit Watson is more skilful and had more "x-factor." I'd say Watson is a rich man's Puopolo.
To say he vastly different as a player (Cyril to Watson) is wrong, but the need to compare them consistently is also not needed, as they’re different in their own ways.
I get the age thing, again. It can come across that way but don’t worry it hasn’t, but the fact is, I’ve watched a lot of him both during his career and rewatching, as I have for a lot of hawthorn games and the afl generally.
I don’t think you can say “Rioli was definitely stronger, quicker, more explosive and a better athlete in general. He was a very rare mix of those traits.” Just don’t believe that to be true, not to say Cyril wasn’t incredible as an athlete, but Watsons athletic profile is similarly top quality. (Strong and powerful, quick, explosive, endurance, leap, de-acceleration) which will only be honed more as he continues at afl level.
As I said there’s really no need to compare them, but to say with such definitive certainty that Watson isn’t as athletic is wrong, could be the same for me saying he is albeit both opinions.