Preview West Coast Vs Essendon - Domain Stadium - Saturday June 13 - 4.35pm

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Outs: Bellchambers, Gleeson, Stanton, Dempsey, Chapman, Gwilt, Cooney
Ins: Watson, Brown, Giles, McKernan(?), Laverde, Ashby, Jerrett

Howlett sub.

Agree with most of those except Giles and Gwilt. Thought he made some mistakes bit considering how many times balli came down he did ok.Also need him v Eagles.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

In: McKernan*, Laverde, Edwards, Langford, Jerrett
Out: Bellchambers, Cooney, Chapman, Ambrose, Gleeson

*pending LTI/rookie list issue clarified and sorted. Giles in otherwise.
-Watson, Fletch and Zaka not to be risked back after the bye.
-Gwilt was serviceable against Geelong he keeps his spot.
-Gleeson unlucky but didn't peform well enough tonight and can't see Howlett or Melksham dropping out with no Watson/Myers/Hocking/Zaka in.
 
I don't know on what possible planet you drop Stanton. One of the few who actually had a crack.

Out Bellchambers Ambrose Chapman Cooney
In Giles McKernan Watson Laverde
When did he have a crack? Was it those few instances of play where he actually did something, which one kind of expects from a 200+ senior player on a regular basis? Or was it when he was jogging around aimlessly? Or when he was calling for the ball when he was out of position?

He adds nothing of value anymore. He has served this club well, no doubt, but what is it he provides that we can't afford to lose? He's not fast. He's not a good disposer of the ball. He's not good at setting up players. All he does is jog around, wave his arms around, lead straight at the backs of opponents or calls for the ball when he's in a worse position than the player with it. Enough with this bullshit, weak defence of "he wasn't our worst so you can't criticise him". He's an outside runner who doesn't run and carry and who can't hit a target. We can have someone else in that role who might actually offer us something useful.

He's done.
 
Why can't he be elevated?
You need to place a player on the long term injury list to elevate a rookie. If a senior player is placed on the injury list I believe it has to be a min ~12 wk injury. I don't think the club thought winderlich would return this quick and in hindsight you'd place kommer instead.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Farking anybody. Kommer. Steinberg. Pears. NOB. Anyone else who we don't need and who isn't going to play AFL.

We don't have a ruckman for our senior team. It's an emergency.
You can't just name a player to the LTI list. They have to actually be, you know, injured.
 
When did he have a crack? Was it those few instances of play where he actually did something, which one kind of expects from a 200+ senior player on a regular basis? Or was it when he was jogging around aimlessly? Or when he was calling for the ball when he was out of position?

He adds nothing of value anymore. He has served this club well, no doubt, but what is it he provides that we can't afford to lose? He's not fast. He's not a good disposer of the ball. He's not good at setting up players. All he does is jog around, wave his arms around, lead straight at the backs of opponents or calls for the ball when he's in a worse position than the player with it. Enough with this bullshit, weak defence of "he wasn't our worst so you can't criticise him". He's an outside runner who doesn't run and carry and who can't hit a target. We can have someone else in that role who might actually offer us something useful.

He's done.

Give me a spell. He always presents as an option and he runs all day. We'd be worse off without him, don't worry about that.

Our players simply aren't running. He is one of the few that is.
 
Farking anybody. Kommer. Steinberg. Pears. NOB. Anyone else who we don't need and who isn't going to play AFL.

We don't have a ruckman for our senior team. It's an emergency.
Then none of those players can play either AFL or VFL for 8 weeks minimum.
 
Outs: Bellchambers, Gleeson, Stanton, Dempsey, Chapman, Gwilt, Cooney
Ins: Watson, Brown, Giles, McKernan(?), Laverde, Ashby, Jerrett

Howlett sub.
wouldn't drop gleeson. And can't bring McKernan in
Thought Stanton was ok...or as ok as you can be

Bags Carlisle Hooker
Gleeson Hurley Hibberd
Jerrett Watson Zerrett
Stanton Daniher Colyer
Laverde Ambrose Fantasia
Giles Kavanagh Heppell
Browne, Ashby, Howlett
Sub: Langford
 
Give me a spell. He always presents as an option and he runs all day. We'd be worse off without him, don't worry about that.

Our players simply aren't running. He is one of the few that is.
He presents an option? You mean when he puts his hands up 50 metres away from the bloke with the ball and at a 45 degree angle? Or when he puts his hands up with 2-3 opponents within 5 metres?

If we'd be so worse off, pray tell what is it we'd lose without him? Besides "run", which he barely provides, or "an option" which invariably doesn't come off.
 
While there is understandably some anger and frustration on this board right now, putting an uninjured player on the LTI just to bring in McKernan for one week is just silly.
 
He presents an option? You mean when he puts his hands up 50 metres away from the bloke with the ball and at a 45 degree angle? Or when he puts his hands up with 2-3 opponents within 5 metres?

If we'd be so worse off, pray tell what is it we'd lose without him? Besides "run", which he barely provides, or "an option" which invariably doesn't come off.
You're wrong
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top