Oh nice. Just saw the edit. My bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Dannnnnnnnnn Easton Wood is down twice so i voted for him twice.By the way, by popular demand I'll allow all six members of the forward line to be selected together.
Haha, the talls are in there twice as they're not always limited to FB/CHB - people might want a very tall defensive setup with all of Fletch, Hamling and Roughead back. Hopefully those that vote for the same player twice are in the minority.Dannnnnnnnnn Easton Wood is down twice so i voted for him twice.
PS- Only Joking, but seriously it will happen.
Maybe it's because we are spoiled for choice, so many options.Interesting, Roughead is getting more votes at CHB than I expected him to so far.
Minson & Roughead.This one's a tad one-sided at the minute, haha.
My major points of interest for this are the ruck situation (one ruck? Two? Who are they?) and our forward setup (Boyd? Redpath? Both?). Also curious to see which of Biggs, McLean and Stevens miss out as, as far as my selection goes, at least one of them misses.
My major points of interest for this are the ruck situation (one ruck? Two? Who are they?) and our forward setup (Boyd? Redpath? Both?). Also curious to see which of Biggs, McLean and Stevens miss out as, as far as my selection goes, at least one of them misses.
Or that a backline doesn't necessarily consist of 6. I think his best position is half back along with Murphy and Boyd. Boyd would play a higher role, more kick behind the play.Maybe most think the wing is JJ's best position next year? I do.
Agreed. If you look at the tendency's this year, You'd have to say that the backline would be roberts, hamling, morris, wood, murphy, m boyd and johannisen. (or similar) this makes 7. with such a heavy reliance on murph, moyd and moz, surely one of these players will play less time back in order for the next crew to come through otherwise we may look a little silly when they all go. put murph on the wing and let him slide back into defence when necessaryOr that a backline doesn't necessarily consist of 6. I think his best position is half back along with Murphy and Boyd. Boyd would play a higher role, more kick behind the play.
Yep. For the purpose of things like this and team sheets etc. one will more than likely get named on the wing or bench.Agreed. If you look at the tendency's this year, You'd have to say that the backline would be roberts, hamling, morris, wood, murphy, m boyd and johannisen. (or similar) this makes 7. with such a heavy reliance on murph, moyd and moz, surely one of these players will play less time back in order for the next crew to come through otherwise we may look a little silly when they all go. put murph on the wing and let him slide back into defence when necessary
I would say seperate because i want to see if you include Jong andShould we vote on the ruck and centre line together or separately?
Don't forget giant-killer Shane BiggsI would say seperate because i want to see if you include Jong and
Bontempelli as options for the ruck spot.
Good question.Should we vote on the ruck and centre line together or separately?
I was going to include Brett Goodes (The Master of Sandilands) ,butDon't forget giant-killer Shane Biggs
hmmm.Should we vote on the ruck and centre line together or separately?
Maybe you could also edit the title whenever voting for a new line opens? So that way people can know without having to open the thread up. May lead to more votes.Should we vote on the ruck and centre line together or separately?
I like it.hmmm.
I'd go ruck + 3 onballers then 2x wingers separate.
Obviously there would be some cross pollination with the players available (ie Macrae could be wing or on-ball) but that would allow a differentiation between the two slightly different roles (onball and wing)