Closed training session yesterday, there is something going on.Well, gee, I'm glad we're keeping it a secret
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Closed training session yesterday, there is something going on.Well, gee, I'm glad we're keeping it a secret
Closed training session yesterday, there is something going on.
Closed training session yesterday, there is something going on.
Not saying the stats are incorrect, but a kick can be effective if they're 40m distance and it goes to a pack, whilst shorter than 40m, it has to hit the target to be effective. My guess is Dahl has thrown it on the boot more than the first three.While the reigning premiers sit eighth with a respectable 5-3 record after the first eight rounds, they are yet to the hit the form of last September. Injuries have played a part in the sputtering start to 2017, but so has the Dogs' inability to hit the scoreboard from ample opportunities. It plagued them for much of last season, but they managed to get it right when it counted most. The kicking efficiency going inside 50 of their prime movers has contributed to the scoring woes, with Jack Macrae (30 per cent), Lachie Hunter (31 per cent) Tom Liberatore (33 per cent) and Luke Dahlhaus (36 per cent) well below the AFL average of 50.4 per cent. Even gun playmaker Marcus Bontempelli is below standard at 47.1 per cent. Out of the regular 'delivery men', only Norm Smith medalist Jason Johannisen hits the mark more often than not at 59.1 per cent of the time. - Ryan Davidson
Not saying the stats are incorrect, but a kick can be effective if they're 40m distance and it goes to a pack, whilst shorter than 40m, it has to hit the target to be effective. My guess is Dahl has thrown it on the boot more than the first three.
In any case, there's not much you can understand from 8 games when any given individual player is only kicking it inside 50 a couple of times. Macrae has 16 inside 50's, Hunter 24, Libba 12, Dahl 29 and Bont 36. Not all of them are kicks where running or handballing the ball over the line counts as well. Even if we say Libba's 33% means that 4 of his 12 kicks (out of 12 inside 50's) were effective. Increasing that to 5 out of 12, which could have happened very easily, increases him to 42%. Reducing him to 3/12 decreases him to 25%. It's nice stats but from a club perspective they're better off getting the match footage and looking at each kick individually (where it wouldn't actually take that long if it takes you 60 seconds to interpret every I50, it would take 12 minutes for Libba...) rather than use stats like that with low sample size it doesn't really mean anything.
Yep. Not denying we butcher the ball. I'm just saying it's kind of pointless to "rank" players like Hunter and Libba's kicking inside 50 against each other when one kick here and there can vary their percentages so wildly. That's why statisticians love large sample sizes.i know that this stat is just for 2017, but watching the dogs last year i can recall that our mids butcher the ball i50 on a regular basis
interesting to see what was the stats for 2016
Did you superimpose Tom boyd's hands in that photo?
Yeh I agree. But that's how they make an article.Yep. Not denying we butcher the ball. I'm just saying it's kind of pointless to "rank" players like Hunter and Libba's kicking inside 50 against each other when one kick here and there can vary their percentages so wildly. That's why statisticians love large sample sizes.
Not the commentators thoughThat's why statisticians love large sample sizes.
I look forward to this every single Friday now. It's hilarious.
If I could stick my tongue any further up Bevos arse then...... Id know what he had for breakfast.
Probably. I am getting pretty tyred of it already in this thread.Should the discussion about rim jobs be moved to the non-footy talk thread?
Bit of a nothing article. Doesn't say anything monumentally insightful that we haven't been discussing here all season.
Probably. I am getting pretty tyred of it already in this thread.
From experience?I don't think this is factually correct. As I understand it different foods pass through the body at different rates so it possible that what you are tasting is last nights dinner not this mornings breakfast.
Me fav . Crunch time is good too"Off the bench" SEN - anyone else love this show?
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk