electricfeel
Cancelled
- Sep 21, 2008
- 9,820
- 12,258
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Subcliffe helped win us the game against Adelaide in Adelaide.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Sutcliffe was the sub in a number of games and his ability to run out games became evident when we lost a player early in a game . His ability to keep running from contest to contest showed it self
Suban and Neile were better subs however because they have explosive pace and impacted on the score board as well as having the ability to expose tied opposition players .
There is a point of difference but all these players compiment the RTB game plan.
I thought I said that but I also said Suban and Neale had more impact on the scoreboardYes Neale and Suban has been good as the sub no body is disputing that. Sutty has been a good sub too, why do you think Ross often has him as the sub more often than not?
Neale is the one I reckon. Will be an superstar for us very soon. Ball magnet who is super clean by hand and makes very smart decisions under pressure.
Neale gave us a glimpse of how he deals with pressure in the finals series .Pencil in a future leader.
Neale is the one I reckon. Will be an superstar for us very soon. Ball magnet who is super clean by hand and makes very smart decisions under pressure.
So, Lachie Neale is a "ball magnet" with 19.8 disposals per game, but Stephen Hill "offers nothing more than mere glimpses" with 19.2 disposals per game?
Huh?
Neale has been sub in at least a third of his games to date.So, Lachie Neale is a "ball magnet" with 19.8 disposals per game, but Stephen Hill "offers nothing more than mere glimpses" with 19.2 disposals per game?
Huh?
Neale has been sub in at least a third of his games to date.
So despite 20% time on ground, Neale averages the same amount of possessions as Hill.Neale averages 66% game time compared to Hills 84%.
So despite 20% time on ground, Neale averages the same amount of possessions as Hill.
If you extrapolate that game time to be the same as Hill's, Neale averages 24 possessions per game. Which is the same as if you remove the outliers where Neale was sub.
So I think one could claim that Neale is a ball magnet, while asserting that Hill is not.
How many times did either fetch 25+ Disposals per game in 2013? Not to fuel the fire as I enjoy watching both players, but I'd bank on Neale having done it more times despite only having played 11 games last year.
So despite 20% time on ground, Neale averages the same amount of possessions as Hill.
If you extrapolate that game time to be the same as Hill's, Neale averages 24 possessions per game. Which is the same as if you remove the outliers where Neale was sub.
So I think one could claim that Neale is a ball magnet, while asserting that Hill is not.
Well when you break it down like that, Michael Barlow is no more a ball magnet than Danyle Pearce.Well, personally, I don't think one disposal per quarter is a massive difference. Particularly when you gain the amount of territory that Stephen Hill does.
That is the reason Hill is tagged.If you are going to compare Hill and Neale, look at metres gained, score involvements, inside 50's and rebound 50's. Those would be the metrics that matter for the role Hill plays.
All things considered, Hill has three years on Neale, and has not improved much since his second year. Bit better able to break tags, the gap between best and worst has shortened, but he's no game breaker. He has scope for improvement but every year that passes he is getting closer to his ceiling. On the other hand, we're still finding out what Neale can do.
I agree. Liked him from the time I first saw him play. A steal in the draft. Reminds me of Ben CousinsNeale is the one I reckon. Will be an superstar for us very soon. Ball magnet who is super clean by hand and makes very smart decisions under pressure.