Analysis Why are we s**t?

Remove this Banner Ad

bombreys said:
Effort has really dropped off second half of the year
Click to expand...
Has it ? There have been a coupe of games , Saints game and second half of the Swans game but there was effort in the Crows and GC games. It was more poor execution and mistakes that cost us.
 
www.theage.com.au

Inside the ‘war room’ that sparked Hawthorn’s stunning rise

Hawthorn had just finished barely above the bottom four despite having one of the league’s oldest lists, so something had to give.
www.theage.com.au www.theage.com.au
A figurative line was drawn above James Sicily’s name.

It was the summer after Hawthorn’s tumultuous 2021 season, during which the Hawks severed ties with four-time premiership coach Alastair Clarkson and replaced him with his former captain Sam Mitchell, who was on Collingwood’s radar to be Nathan Buckley’s successor.

They acted quickly and, perhaps, a bit messily to ensure Mitchell’s first senior coaching job would be in brown and gold, even if it meant ending Clarkson’s legendary tenure a year early and handing him a $900,000 payout.
Mitchell, football boss Rob McCartney, football director Richie Vandenberg and list manager Mark McKenzie were in the so-called “war room” at Waverley Park thrashing out a new list strategy.

Hawthorn had just finished barely above the bottom four despite having one of the league’s oldest lists, so something had to give. Fast-forward to today, and Mitchell’s Hawks are one win away from booking a shock finals berth with a young list after having a 0-5 win-loss record in mid-April.
The plan from the start was to be more collaborative than the previous regime, which was ragingly successful until a sour end in more recent years – but duopolised by Clarkson and ex-football chief Graham Wright.

Melbourne and the Western Bulldogs played in the 2021 grand final, and the aforementioned quartet ran an exercise to decide between them, in a hypothetical scenario, how many Hawks would have played in that game – while also being young enough to feature in the club’s next premiership.

The number was only six, including Sicily, who turned 27 in January 2022.

It was not that anyone older than Sicily was written off, but Mitchell and co believed they needed to be realistic about how long it would take to compete for another premiership.
Jai Newcombe arrived via the mid-season draft the previous season and has since become a key midfield cog, but there was not enough certainty about him at that stage.
None of Tom Mitchell, Jaeger O’Meara or Chad Wingard – key planks in Clarkson’s vision to defy AFL gravity, to the point he gave away a series of first-round picks to get them – was part of the six either.
Nor was Irishman Conor Nash, who has now forced himself into that territory.

Mitchell and O’Meara famously departed in trades to Collingwood and Fremantle, respectively, by year’s end, with Hawthorn paying some of their wage to move them on, while they delisted Wingard last year before selecting him again in the pre-season draft (after his agent Tom Petroro’s intervention).
Mitchell, in particular, was viewed internally as blocking ascending star Will Day’s path to major midfield minutes.

Day, then only 20, was likely among the super six. The rest of that exclusive group might have been Blake Hardwick, Jarman Impey, Dylan Moore – fresh from a breakout season – and Mitch Lewis. Changkuoth Jiath and James Worpel were probably around the mark, too.

McKenzie was charged with analysing the rise and trends of recent premiers, including the Demons, although Mitchell made clear that he did not want to simply copy successful rivals and become an inferior version.

There were shades of Melbourne’s draft and trade strategy two years ago when the Hawks sent pick 27 and future second- and third-round selections to Sydney on draft night in return for No.18, which they used to select a kid from the Oakleigh Chargers called Josh Weddle.

That future second-rounder came via Fremantle, along with Lloyd Meek – now Hawthorn’s No.1 ruckman – in the O’Meara deal.

Coach Mitchell had a clear picture about how he wanted to play and the types of players he needed, including character traits and specific names for positions, such as “clever forwards”. Wingard and Luke Breust previously fit that bill, whereas Jack Ginnivan and Nick Watson are Generation Next.

Mitchell’s priority was to invest in the draft then quickly get as many AFL matches as possible into the emerging crop, from Newcombe to the likes of Day, Josh Ward, Cam Mackenzie, Weddle and Connor Macdonald.

There was an unwritten rule in Mitchell’s first two seasons that they would have double-digit players aged 23 or younger in their senior side each week, while they also persisted longer with younger players through struggles or form slumps than what many clubs do.
This strategy was underpinned by Mitchell’s motto for the Hawks’ brains trust to adopt the “longest view in the room”, according to a well-placed source who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
This was why Mitchell might have been frustrated but never panicked as Hawthorn copped consecutive shellackings to start last year then lost their first five matches in 2024.
“I think consistency of decision-making has been important,” Mitchell said this week.

“[We have been] big on strategy, so making sure strategically we were all heading, as a whole organisation, in the same direction. So whether that was the way the list was being built, the way we staffed the list, the way we developed the list, [or] the way we picked the selection for each game.
“I think the consistency of all those things going through the same filter [was important].
“Every single decision has gone through the strategic, ‘Is this the right decision, not just for this weekend, but for our strategy?’ ... I think that’s what’s led to the accelerated performance.”
Another person who had fingerprints on the Hawks’ list direction was Josh Vanderloo, formerly of the AFL and hired by Hawthorn as general manager of operations and special projects.
Vanderloo’s main job was to deliver the club an AFLW team, but he also chipped in on the AFL team’s list strategy based off his experience in developing the league’s player-movement mechanisms.

His knowledge came to the fore in last year’s trade period, when the Hawks capitalised on an obscure rule whereby Massimo D’Ambrosio could become a delisted free agent after Essendon offered him a one-year deal to remain on the rookie list for a third season.

The clubs ended up brokering a trade, but the Bombers were blindsided. D’Ambrosio has been excellent this season and might even make the extended All-Australian squad.
Analytics have been integral to Hawthorn’s recruiting decisions, too, with Steve Gloury – a data scientist who became the first person to score a full-time analytics job in the AFL with Fremantle eight years ago – employed to help in that area.
They also appointed North Melbourne’s former head recruiter Mark Finnigan in mid-2022 after identifying the need to bolster their recruiting department, then added Jarryd Roughead before this season as the Hawks’ free agency and trade player acquisition manager.

Roughead represents the next phase of Hawthorn’s list build.

Just as the selection policy no longer has a heightened focus on a certain number of young players in the senior side, the Hawks are also increasingly on the lookout for mature-age additions in the trade and free agency space.

Tall defenders Tom Barrass and Josh Battle are their chief trade and free agency targets for this year, but they remain in the hunt for Giant Harry Perryman and asked the question about Bailey Smith, who seems headed to Geelong.

The club’s moves in last year’s trade period have also paid dividends, with D’Ambrosio, Ginnivan and Mabior Chol performing critical roles, while Jack Gunston’s impact on his return has also been a pleasant surprise.

Another source familiar with the situation told this masthead that Mitchell had a frank discussion with Gunston before the trade went through on what his expectations would be. A selfless approach was a must.

Giving up Brandon Ryan to the Brisbane Lions as part of the deal to bring back Gunston, who initiated the move, might seem counterintuitive to everything else the Hawks have done, but that trade delivered the selection that was passed on to Gold Coast for Chol.

It was another savvy piece of business, and Gunston has kicked 27 goals in 15 games while serving as a mentor to players such as Calsher Dear, who has stunned even Mitchell with his output in his debut season.

Anyone who matters at Hawthorn is at pains to point out there will be more challenges ahead, and they do not believe the blueprint is complete.
But there is sure to be some envy from opposition clubs wondering how the Hawks – who have won premierships in every previous decade since the 1960s – have raced past them again.
“[We were] trying to build a list, playing group [and] culture that would sustain us through successful times, and that would create a game style that would bring success for when our time for finals footy came, so we’ve been building towards it,” Mitchell said.
“There was no speed limit on how quickly that would be.
“The role of all of us as the support for the players is to put us in an environment where we can go as quickly as possible. Now we’re getting close, but we’re far from a finished product.”
Click to expand...

I thought this was an interesting read on the topic of rebuilding a list and the need to take a long, strategic view on things (and stick with it).
 
ant555 said:
Has it ? There have been a coupe of games , Saints game and second half of the Swans game but there was effort in the Crows and GC games. It was more poor execution and mistakes that cost us.
Click to expand...
Old Campaigner said:
www.theage.com.au

Inside the ‘war room’ that sparked Hawthorn’s stunning rise

Hawthorn had just finished barely above the bottom four despite having one of the league’s oldest lists, so something had to give.
www.theage.com.au www.theage.com.au


I thought this was an interesting read on the topic of rebuilding a list and the need to take a long, strategic view on things (and stick with it).
Click to expand...

Really just a long winded way to say we tanked for 3 years and used analytics and an understanding of list rules to develop a list/add talent in a balanced way.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

jdstorm said:
Really just a long winded way to say we tanked for 3 years and used analytics and an understanding of list rules to develop a list/add talent in a balanced way.
Click to expand...
The thing I took from it in particular was the confidence to embark on that course, knowing the on-field performances would be shit for several years and knowing that would bring a lot of pressure from outside the club.

A lot of that other stuff I think stems from a club that knows what is needed for success. The finer details change but analytics, list management were known to be areas that deserved respect and were duly resourced with the best talent available.
 
By contrast we seem more reactive and lacking assurance in what we do. I think it has improved in the last year of so but I think we have a long way to go before look confident in ourselves as an organisation
 
Old Campaigner said:
The thing I took from it in particular was the confidence to embark on that course, knowing the on-field performances would be shit for several years and knowing that would bring a lot of pressure from outside the club.

A lot of that other stuff I think stems from a club that knows what is needed for success. The finer details change but analytics, list management were known to be areas that deserved respect and were duly resourced with the best talent available.
Click to expand...

I think because I understand and value the data side to such a high degree I just assume all clubs with ambition are going to have appropriate funding in place

When the reality is that’s far from the norm and even then many analysts are content to copy working models less well.

So I probably should give them more credit.
 
Old Campaigner said:
www.theage.com.au

Inside the ‘war room’ that sparked Hawthorn’s stunning rise

Hawthorn had just finished barely above the bottom four despite having one of the league’s oldest lists, so something had to give.
www.theage.com.au www.theage.com.au


I thought this was an interesting read on the topic of rebuilding a list and the need to take a long, strategic view on things (and stick with it).
Click to expand...
Very interesting. Some teams just get it.

I feel like we need to take a similar path with some of our senior players. Bite the bullet before Tasmania comes in or we'll end up like North very quickly.
 
Some of you on here are really harshly judging the list.

While it isn’t quite Top 4 yet, the scope for improvement is there.

Personally, I think we will look back on the last two drafts in particular and say “shit, they actually nailed it.” Caddy is going to be a match winner. Roberts seems like a steal and is a bloke that seems like he wants to be a winner. Tstatas, if given time to build his body up, is the midfielder we have been crying out for, for years.

Why blow up the list and start again when that is already happening? The players that are named on this board as deadweight will be gone, at a minimum, three years time.

Lav is a stop gap until Reid is ready and gets his body right.
Gresham is a handy player until Kako, or the Davey twins are ready.

I’m sure there is more I’m missing, but the list build is happening in front of us.

Comparing us to Hawthorn is silly. Win a flag and then we can do what they did. We had a drug scandal to content with.

The core is there and the comp has shown that you just need to be 5-10% better at the right time and you’re a chance.
 
bomberlegend2007 said:
Some of you on here are really harshly judging the list.

While it isn’t quite Top 4 yet, the scope for improvement is there.

Personally, I think we will look back on the last two drafts in particular and say “shit, they actually nailed it.” Caddy is going to be a match winner. Roberts seems like a steal and is a bloke that seems like he wants to be a winner. Tstatas, if given time to build his body up, is the midfielder we have been crying out for, for years.

Why blow up the list and start again when that is already happening? The players that are named on this board as deadweight will be gone, at a minimum, three years time.

Lav is a stop gap until Reid is ready and gets his body right.
Gresham is a handy player until Kako, or the Davey twins are ready.

I’m sure there is more I’m missing, but the list build is happening in front of us.

Comparing us to Hawthorn is silly. Win a flag and then we can do what they did. We had a drug scandal to content with.

The core is there and the comp has shown that you just need to be 5-10% better at the right time and you’re a chance.
Click to expand...

Think you’re being overly generous.

We’re finishing 11th, again.

We have an old list, older than 12 other clubs.

It’s hard to be positive at the moment, as it’s hard to see where the improvement comes from.
 
Old Campaigner said:
The thing I took from it in particular was the confidence to embark on that course, knowing the on-field performances would be shit for several years and knowing that would bring a lot of pressure from outside the club.
Click to expand...

Having banked premierships inside the last decade helps with that. Too many of our supporters are hung up on the ‘20 years since a finals win’ thing and have no patience for a rebuild. As bad as BF is, reading the comments on Facebook or Instagram is so much worse.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

faible said:
I’d take a guess that Goldstein alone might account for the gap between us at 73 average and 7th, and Richmond at 66 average and 11th.
Click to expand...
I hate that stat..

Hind, Heppell, Goldstein all should be gone at years end.. I would hazard we go back down to one of the youngest come round 1 next year
 
bombreys said:
Think you’re being overly generous.

We’re finishing 11th, again.

We have an old list, older than 12 other clubs.

It’s hard to be positive at the moment, as it’s hard to see where the improvement comes from.
Click to expand...
Maybe, but this is opposed to the overly negative talk in this thread.

We can’t draft good talent and if we do, what does it matter? We would **** up their development anyway.

The core is there. I can see what the club is doing.
 
bombreys said:
I didn’t think it was there against Adelaide - nor Melbourne.
Click to expand...
How was there no effort against the Crows ?
Melbourne was a team selection issue and not an effort issue.
 
BrunoV said:
At the end of the day our prime midfield movers for 20 years have included Stanton, Heppell and Parish.

More qualified people than me think that's okay.
Click to expand...
And some do not. Sadly they do not work for us.
 
bomberlegend2007 said:
Some of you on here are really harshly judging the list.

While it isn’t quite Top 4 yet, the scope for improvement is there.

Personally, I think we will look back on the last two drafts in particular and say “shit, they actually nailed it.” Caddy is going to be a match winner. Roberts seems like a steal and is a bloke that seems like he wants to be a winner. Tstatas, if given time to build his body up, is the midfielder we have been crying out for, for years.

Why blow up the list and start again when that is already happening? The players that are named on this board as deadweight will be gone, at a minimum, three years time.

Lav is a stop gap until Reid is ready and gets his body right.
Gresham is a handy player until Kako, or the Davey twins are ready.

I’m sure there is more I’m missing, but the list build is happening in front of us.

Comparing us to Hawthorn is silly. Win a flag and then we can do what they did. We had a drug scandal to content with.

The core is there and the comp has shown that you just need to be 5-10% better at the right time and you’re a chance.
Click to expand...
I want to believe this... but I just don't see it happening with this list.
Our senior group is just too lacking, it feels like we're trapped in a cycle of mediocrity where experience is quite frankly not being passed down from the best. We are on the 3rd generation of leaders who came up under leaders that never had success. I think it's a big part of why we're consistently 5-10-20% off the best.
 
bombreys said:
Think you’re being overly generous.

We’re finishing 11th, again.

We have an old list, older than 12 other clubs.

It’s hard to be positive at the moment, as it’s hard to see where the improvement comes from.
Click to expand...
He is being generous but its incredibly easy to see where the improvement comes from.

Remove Kelly, Heppell, Parish, Hobbs, Guelfi from the side and replace them with SEH, Duursma, a few young players that dont need to be superstars, just that can move and use the thing and we are miles ahead.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis Why are we s**t?

Similar threads

D
  • Poll
Opinion We need to move back to the MCG
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
131
Views
5K
LB#16
LB#16
Harlequin
AFL Toast RND 21: We Gave Freo The Old Heave Ho!
8 9 10 11 12
Replies
284
Views
9K
yodellinhank
yodellinhank
jannissary
Analysis i've got a high tolerance for essendon being s**t, but this game was appalling
6 7 8 9 10
Replies
229
Views
10K
Beerfish
Beerfish
Runk
  • Poll
Opinion Are You Genuinely Excited For The New Season?
2 3 4
Replies
95
Views
3K
Gabe251
Gabe251
Lore
Competitions 2023 THAT'S MY GIRL DRAFT - And we're off! Late sign ups are welcome 😁
2 3 4
Replies
92
Views
3K
RedmanWasHere
RedmanWasHere
Old Campaigner
Recruiting AFL Draft Watch 2024 - What do we do, we don't have a top 10 pick?
79 80 81 82 83
Replies
2K
Views
99K
Keystone agony
Keystone agony
quotemokc
AFL Toast Win against Wet Toast
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
166
Views
6K
Dave
Dave

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top