- Oct 12, 2016
- 7,225
- 8,403
- AFL Club
- GWS
This bloke was talked up as the next Bont when we took him. Seems a long time ago now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think we'll need that for davey when 22 moves outA good get for the Bombers. And for Will, he will get games for them.
In saying that, he’s second string for the blues so doesn’t really impact their squad.
Carlton would obviously prefer their pick in the 40s but Dodoro will Dodoro and it will be the 60s pick.
The funny thing is i always thought we'd get setterfield from gws and saad would head to carlton from gcs.Finally the Bombers land the big bodied midfielder they’ve been waiting for
I remember Dodoro was keen in his draft year.The funny thing is i always thought we'd get setterfield from gws and saad would head to carlton from gcs.
Got there in the end
He was touted as a #1 option.I remember Dodoro was keen in his draft year.
Should get more opportunities at the stoppages at the Bombers. He can’t really play anywhere else.
We're not going to delist him. Would have to go through the draft (likely PSD).He could be signed as a DFA, Carlton don't have leverage
Reckon clubs are coming round to delistings if the pick isnt of any valueWe're not going to delist him. Would have to go through the draft (likely PSD).
We'd prefer to keep him though, especially for a no value pick.Reckon clubs are coming round to delistings if the pick isnt of any value
Whats the point if he's vfl depth
We're ok for points. 41 will match davey.We'd prefer to keep him though, especially for a no value pick.
I'm sure we'll work out a trade that offers us something better than #62, though. Especially when you'll be wanting points.
Could be something like #42 for Setterfield + #49 + #66We're ok for points. 41 will match davey.
If anything, 22 is a problem for us, but way overs for setterfield
How about #22 for Setterfield, #49, #66, #68.If anything, 22 is a problem for us, but way overs for setterfield
This would be the best the blues would hope for.Could be something like #42 for Setterfield + #49 + #66
Points wise (and then picks wise) is better for you than trading #62, but we actually get something.
I think if anything we move 22 up or to 2023.How about #22 for Setterfield, #49, #66, #68.
That puts his value at #41, but then all those picks come in when Ashcroft and Fletcher are bid/matched.
flanker confirmed then,Finally the Bombers land the big bodied midfielder they’ve been waiting for
we aren't moving out a more than reasonable pick to miss on getting another talented kid in before a Davey bid just to get a bloke who could more than likely be had as a DFA (he is currently out of contract)How about #22 for Setterfield, #49, #66, #68.
That puts his value at #41, but then all those picks come in when Ashcroft and Fletcher are bid/matched.
OK, so still, no leverage.We're not going to delist him. Would have to go through the draft (likely PSD).
Pick 22 or GGF Dodo.