Wines: Just a poor man's Crouch

[John Hart Jnr]

Good work highlighting the fact that you were a Bees dick (or a fluke bounce) from finishing 11th- and don't forget your soft as butter draw

Luckily for us that Wines > Crouch.

 

[xamol]

Luckily for us that Wines > Crouch.

Put up a poll then Einstein

 

[John Hart Jnr]

Put up a poll then Einstein

Are you saying that Wines didn't beat Crouch in that one on one that ultimately gave us a finals spot instead of you?

 

[Asgardian]

Lucky the crowbots have got early draft picks so they can try to have matching Head-Crouch's

 

[subaru]

I'm sure getting pantsed by Collingwood and racking up a dozen possessions for Plonker et.al will be a good experience. Not concerned about next year? Full strength Poort list with exceptional luck and a soft draw scrape into the top 8. Undermanned Crows team with a year to forget poised to leap back into finals contention next year.

They shat themselves in the last quarter at home in front of a massive " home" crowd ! Plonks seemed to vanish when games got a bit hard
I'm sure they'll be just fine when the Collingwood chant starts up next week !

 

[subaru]

Pretty significant injury given the events preeceding our forward line structure. Losing Tippett really did put all our eggs in one basket and then to have the the basket break really really hurt us.

Never the less we have had key players miss throughout the year for variable periods. Reily, Sloane, Dangerfield, Jenkins, Lynch, Crouch etc.

26 players rotated through our forward line this season

 

[xamol]

Are you saying that Wines didn't beat Crouch in that one on one that ultimately gave us a finals spot instead of you?

According to your logic, if you win a one on one contest, then the winner is the better footballer.

So, using your logic, Josh Carr>>Mark Riccuito


Dame you Roo with your 8 AA's and Brownlow medal!!!

 

[BUTTON 92]

Are you saying that Wines didn't beat Crouch in that one on one that ultimately gave us a finals spot instead of you?

Crouch also beat Ablett in a one on one when we played them at Metricon this year. Crouch >> Ablett in your 'logic'.

 

[subaru]

Crouch also beat Ablett in a one on one when we played them at Metricon this year. Crouch >> Ablett in your 'logic'.

On - they're not saying that are they ?
I may have to unignore them for the laughs if they are!
A whole one on one stat now determines who is better - not the number of preseasons anymore !!!!
Wish they'd make up their minds !

 

[John Hart Jnr]

Crouch also beat Ablett in a one on one when we played them at Metricon this year. Crouch >> Ablett in your 'logic'.

No he didn't. You just made that up. Where's your proof?

Here's proof of Wines pantsing Crouch in a crucial one on one contest that ends up with Wingard kicking a goal.

http://tinypic.com/r/2aj43r5/5

If Crouch had beaten Wines in that one on one here's how the premiership table would have looked.

7th Crows 11-11 108%
8th Carlton 11-11 107%
10th Port 11-11 102%

Wines > Crouch

 

[John Hart Jnr]

According to your logic, if you win a one on one contest, then the winner is the better footballer.

So, using your logic, Josh Carr>>Mark Riccuito


Dame you Roo with your 8 AA's and Brownlow medal!!!

Yesterdays men.

That's all you Crowies have. You resort to talking some bloke that debuted over 20 years ago.

Crouch gets a lot of the ball because he is in a weaker midfield. He doesn't win the one on ones that count though. That is why ....

Wines > Crouch

 

[Sekaj]

What's the point with arguing with someone who knows their just talking shit?

 

[John Hart Jnr]

What's the point with arguing with someone who knows their just talking shit?

So when has Crouch beaten Wines in a one on one contest ... ever?

 

[marshallfender]

So when has Crouch beaten Wines in a one on one contest ... ever?

Who is this wines that you speak of??

 

[Sekaj]

So when has Crouch beaten Wines in a one on one contest ... ever?

Wines is better than Crouch because Crouch has apparently never beaten Wines in a one on one contest ... and Poort Power "exist to win premierships".

 

[Asgardian]

I suppose Head-Crouch could be okay, if he ever grows a pair .... will have to leave the crowbots to do so.

 

[John Hart Jnr]

Wines is better than Crouch.

That'd make a great sig.

Thanks

 

[Sekaj]

That'd make a great sig.

Thanks

Wines is better than Crouch because Crouch has apparently never beaten Wines in a one on one contest ... and Poort Power "Live the Creed".

 

[Asgardian]

And Wines isn't a squib

 

[John Hart Jnr]

And Wines isn't a squib

They seem to forget that.

 

[xamol]

Wines, just a poor mans Crouch.

Has a good ring to it

 

[Harold Larwood]

Wines, just a poor mans Crouch.

Has a good ring to it

Better be careful, they might get angry and resort to using a 15-second video clip which conclusively settles this argument!

Honestly, talking to Poort fans about Crouch being better than Wines is like telling a red neck from Alabama that God isn't real.

 

[RonSon]

Better be careful, they might get angry and resort to using a 15-second video clip which conclusively settles this argument!

Honestly, talking to Poort fans about Crouch being better than Wines is like telling a red neck from Alabama that God isn't real.

Tell us the other one, the one about how the Crows didn't cheat, that was a cracker.

You're being punished for no reason! Hahahaha.

 

[Asgardian]

Wines, just a poor mans Crouch.

Has a good ring to it

Head-Crouch ........... just goes together like crowbot-squib ...

Better be careful, they might get angry and resort to using a 15-second video clip which conclusively settles this argument!

Great idea ...



Crowbots ........ land of the squibs

 

[Rollerball]

^ Yep ten goals down with a minute to go in a practice match is when you want to put your body on the line.