i now you're being facetious, but no its not their fault. Its the idiots masquerading as mentors and educators who tell half truths and abuse their trust to manipluate their learning and development.
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Society/Culture Woke. Can you tell real from parody? - Part 2 -
- Thread starter Frank Bunn
- Start date
- Tagged users None
i now you're being facetious, but no its not their fault. Its the idiots masquerading as mentors and educators who tell half truths and abuse their trust to manipluate their learning and development.
- Sep 17, 2019
- 23,983
- 37,438
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #852
Are you saying that she didn't help to protect Biff Tannen?
Teachers are to blame! Even when they said it was the immigrants, I knew it was the teachers!
You want that person to be in YOUR SS detail protecting your life? You gotta be ****ing kidding me?
no-one likes a smart arse. Debate in good faith or **** off.
- Sep 17, 2019
- 23,983
- 37,438
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #856
This isn't about me. What makes you think that the best of the best would be lining up to babysit Trump?
He is renowned for not paying his bills.
Which they completely and utterly ficked with the worst possible outcome the deaths of others.
You're unreal mate. What a legend. The current Presidential favoutite is nealry shot dead on their watch, at least one other perosn is dead on their watch, and you call it baby-sitting Trump, with the addition of some gibberish about not paying bills.
- Sep 17, 2019
- 23,983
- 37,438
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #859
The best of the best SS are busy protecting the actual president from deranged republicans.
I don't make the rules.
You mean minding that he doesn't soil himself?
- Sep 17, 2019
- 23,983
- 37,438
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #861
Trump doesn't seem to mind, has been doing this for years.
Again, why would you even want the best of the best babysitting this guy?
Former ‘Apprentice’ Staffer Claims Donald Trump Wore Diapers On Set: ‘He Would Often Soil Himself’
Comedian and former The Apprentice staffer Noel Casler alleged on Friday that President Donald Trump wears adult diapers and often soils himself in public. In a
ground.news
Why would I want the SS protecting the likely next President of the US? I think democcracy is pretty important, that's why. I know that is anethema to the regressives on the left, but there you go.
As the for the second bit: Sounds legit.
- Mar 20, 2007
- 29,243
- 26,518
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He's just been repeating the same thing over and over again
The Secret Service fitness test is actually super easy, particularly for older people and double particularly for women.
Can we retire the best-of-the-best phrase now? It honestly makes me want hurt puppies.
Can we retire the best-of-the-best phrase now? It honestly makes me want hurt puppies.
It's odd that Kimberly Cheatle assigned herself entirely tall, strong, physically imposing men to be her body guards.
I guess the 5'6 slightly overweight women are better to protect others like Trump...
There are a LOT of bad faith arguments in this thread, yes, like trying to pretend men aren't much much better at protecting people physically. Then making up imaginary superwomen
What question was it again? Because I remember a lot of my questions going unanswered.
Last edited:
- Moderator
- #870
Quite literally no-one has argued that. It's acknowledged that men are (on average) physically stronger than women, and that peak strength men outclass peak strength women in amounts able to be lifted (i.e. raw strength).
The argument (that you keep glossing over) is that 'physical strength' is not the only component of what a Secret Service agent does, and it's not even relevant to most of what they do (investigative work, shooting people, identifying threats, meeting deadlines, long hours of work, policing stuff etc).
You constantly gloss over that argument (you literally have not rebutted it yet, and its fatal to your own position) and just keep making the assertion that 'raw physical strength' is what makes a Secret Service agent (despite that fact being self evidently not true).
It really just makes you look like a screaming misogynist, in addition to making you look like a bad faith debater.
- Sep 15, 2011
- 32,807
- 50,993
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Every accusation is a confession.There are a LOT of bad faith arguments in this thread, yes, like trying to pretend men aren't much much better at protecting people physically. Then making up imaginary superwomen
What question was it again? Because I remember a lot of my questions going unanswered.
In strength, speed, size and agility, not just strength, don't gloss over that.
"Most" of what a front line secret service agent does is protecting the President (or similar VIP). They have different teams for surveillance, intelligence, sniping teams, how do you not understand that? I'm talking about the people on the front lines, not beyond the scenes operators. I've already addressed this multiple times, try to keep up.
When was the last time you saw a front line Agent shoot someone? Because I can show you times where they've had to tackle people or physically restrain people from getting too close...
I've mentioned at least 4-5 times that physical strength is of course not the only thing that makes a secret service agent, it should be however a non-negotiable. The fact that I have said this constantly yet you keep bringing it up shows you either can't read what I'm writing or you're arguing in bad faith.
Oh yes bring out the misogynist card because I dared to say men are better at physical protection that women, straight out of the screaming far left playbook, well done.
You accuse me of bad faith arguing then ignore things I've said to make your position sound better
- Sep 17, 2019
- 23,983
- 37,438
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #874
That he won a free subscription to Men's Health magazine?
