nofearbrowny
Team Captain
Did Aish deserve to be all Australian or was he picked because of previous good performances, I saw him against vic country I thought he was okay. Is AA picked solely on performances at nat champs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Did Aish deserve to be all Australian or was he picked because of previous good performances, I saw him against vic country I thought he was okay. Is AA picked solely on performances at nat champs
Just a few thoughts . South Aussie kids were super impressive for mine.
Chris, your thoughts on Luke Reynolds ? Reminded me so much of Lucas it wasn't funny.
Read your OP again. Sensational draft for Freo nailing our requirements beautifully, including 1 more Pearce.
Did Aish deserve to be all Australian or was he picked because of previous good performances, I saw him against vic country I thought he was okay. Is AA picked solely on performances at nat champs
Bit of an update in the OP. Not 100% finished, but I didn't see the point in holding onto it.
I think he deserved it. He didn't get as many disposals as some other midfielders, but you could easily argue that he had the greatest impact of any midfielder. And you'd take 15 Aish disposals over 30 from a lot of the others who played.
Considering Aish didn't play a single game of football prior to the Championships this year, I'd say he exceeded expectations. At least he did better than I expected, I would have been happy with him just getting through the tournament.
13 touches in just a half of football in the first match, BOG in the second game against Queensland and in the final game many judged his 14 disposal game to be more influential than Dunstan's 22 touch performance. His only down game came against Vic Country, when he was well held by Billy Hartung.
He did. Aish, Scharenberg and Billings were the three players who went back to back with All Australian selections.
would it be wrong to suggest that because the afl have invested so heavily in the ais lads they only have to show a little to be selected in aa side. Are the selectors the guys that travelled with them to Europe and helped with their development
I really think the selectors should be impartial,Kevin Sheehan and mick ablett seem to promote ais kids with too much consistency. It taints the selection processAbsolutely love this, there is so much conflict of interest around the whole National champs. From the commentators describing the games, even down to the players themselves. The Vic metro v Vic country game was almost an embarrassment, the lack of intensity, players not giving the best option to give to their mates in worse positions.
We are just beginning to see some of the clubs ignore the hype on players and make their own decisions on players.
My prediction is the % of players being drafted who played Nat. Championships for the big 4 teams will reduoften the next few years as recruiters become even more accountable for decisions they make on players outside the round 1 picks.
By the advanced stats from the champs there are some question marks but I only saw one game so hard for me to judge, if the ais are the best let them get to the top by merit of performance not publicity from people who seem to be serving two mastersConsidering the AIS boys are supposed to be the best of the best, you'd expect (and hope) that they would be the best performed players throughout the Championships. I've got no issue with any of the All Australian selections.
As for the focus on the 'big names' you can hardly blame the commentators, or the guys in the match review videos. Most people are only interested in the early selections after all, and these guys have been following the AIS Academy all season. It's only natural to focus on what you know.
Considering the AIS boys are supposed to be the best of the best, you'd expect (and hope) that they would be the best performed players throughout the Championships. I've got no issue with any of the All Australian selections.
As for the focus on the 'big names' you can hardly blame the commentators, or the guys in the match review videos. Most people are only interested in the early selections after all, and these guys have been following the AIS Academy all season. It's only natural to focus on what you know.
Yes the AIS players have been considered the best at a place in time, and on the whole they continue to be. However we expect impartial and balance commentary from people not agenda driven politics. If an AIS player is struggling say so and more than that be complimentary of others who are doing well.
What are your thoughts of North Adelaide's Campbell Combe?