Teams Your 2014 SC team Ver. 3.0 (During Nab)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Thanks will move him to D4.
Don't get me wrong, I like the pick, will either be a major fail or a master stroke. I just think you should downgrade Kennedy to another premium back.

Ps. ditch Fuller
 
Don't get me wrong, I like the pick, will either be a major fail or a master stroke. I just think you should downgrade Kennedy to another premium back.

Ps. ditch Fuller
Don't get me wrong, I like the pick, will either be a major fail or a master stroke. I just think you should downgrade Kennedy to another premium back.

Ps. ditch Fuller
image.jpg
 
LO7IcQK.png
 
Finished in the top 1200 last year. Here is my first attempt team. Taking the risk with Hawkins-Higgins, surely it can't be worse than starting Karnezis and Jack Watts last year.

29bojgw.jpg

Just made my 2nd team which I think is better. Would you guys pick my first team or second team? Thanks

2croz1i.jpg
 
team.png

Hi all,
This is my first post on here as a new member... just like everyone else, I'm just looking for some feedback on my team.
Cheers.
 
I like the team... only thoughts are that Bartel is not filling me with confidence this year for some reason, I went for Hibberd instead and saved $55,000ish, not sure that Murphy can handle the tag especially with Judd out for a while at the start of the year, query on Roughead with no Buddy... will he get extra attention? Higgins an obvious risk, but good on you for giving him a go!

Just made my 2nd team which I think is better. Would you guys pick my first team or second team? Thanks

2croz1i.jpg
 
View attachment 44956

Hi all,
This is my first post on here as a new member... just like everyone else, I'm just looking for some feedback on my team.
Cheers.
welcome to the board

you need to work on your rookies

if i was you i would swap out Sheed for Polec

next you might wanna look at the expensive rookies that you have; specifically KK in the backs and Billings and Hogan in the fwd. Can you make just as much money and score similar with others? you might think about downing one of the fwds to rohan and keeping the extra cash for a rainy day... is KK gonna play rd 1? i personally like the looks of langdon back there

lastly i don't think Fuller will play rd 1 either - he hasn't played either NAB challenge has he?

edit: Hibberd might have injury cloud over him as well
 
It really pisses me off when you make a stack of changes to accommodate a player you want and you're short $100. Really? FFS.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

welcome to the board

you need to work on your rookies

if i was you i would swap out Sheed for Polec

next you might wanna look at the expensive rookies that you have; specifically KK in the backs and Billings and Hogan in the fwd. Can you make just as much money and score similar with others? you might think about downing one of the fwds to rohan and keeping the extra cash for a rainy day... is KK gonna play rd 1? i personally like the looks of langdon back there

lastly i don't think Fuller will play rd 1 either - he hasn't played either NAB challenge has he?

edit: Hibberd might have injury cloud over him as well

Thanks, dude... yeah, just had a look at those rookies and hibberd just had a minor hammy and should be back round 1, 2 at the worst so I will keep him there for now.
 
View attachment 44964
Not loving the cheap backline options so going strong there at this stage. Thoughts? $50,000 remaning.
Your Forward line is suffering because of it too.You could possibly scrape 150k by swapping out Cripps and Laidler for cheaper rookies and maybe swap Ryder for someone like McIntosh/Hickey. That would allow you to go Menzel > Wright.
Unless you think Menzel will breakout this season.
 
Screenshot_2014-02-28-00-03-58.png Screenshot_2014-02-28-00-03-58.png Screenshot_2014-02-28-00-03-50.png Screenshot_2014-02-28-00-03-50.png

long time lurker first time poster. ;)

any thoughts would be great guys..
gone a bit midfield heavy this time. going for a higher overall rank than league rank.

harry taylor as my POD in the backline.. happy to take home his 90+ every week. I believe laidler will play so going to keep him there too..

midfield will get me all my points. collingwood have a tough draw leading up to the bye. so looking to pick up pendelbury after the byes.. jack as another sort of POD. could possibly look to downgrade thomas to polec if I need the cash elsewhere.

couldnt decide on any other ruck combo. hampson and grundy appealed to me. but not enough.

danger martin and mitchell are locked into my fwd line. betts looked like value at that range.. will look to upgrade him come bye time.. and yes I know someone will yell at me for selecting higgins.. and yes ive also said no more to higgins more times than ive sworn ill never drink again. but one like the other.. too hard to succumb too.

please guys any thoughts (figured a way to put up pics for those who dont read text teams) cheers
 
View attachment 44973View attachment 44973 View attachment 44974 View attachment 44974

long time lurker first time poster. ;)

any thoughts would be great guys..
gone a bit midfield heavy this time. going for a higher overall rank than league rank.

harry taylor as my POD in the backline.. happy to take home his 90+ every week. I believe laidler will play so going to keep him there too..

midfield will get me all my points. collingwood have a tough draw leading up to the bye. so looking to pick up pendelbury after the byes.. jack as another sort of POD. could possibly look to downgrade thomas to polec if I need the cash elsewhere.

couldnt decide on any other ruck combo. hampson and grundy appealed to me. but not enough.

danger martin and mitchell are locked into my fwd line. betts looked like value at that range.. will look to upgrade him come bye time.. and yes I know someone will yell at me for selecting higgins.. and yes ive also said no more to higgins more times than ive sworn ill never drink again. but one like the other.. too hard to succumb too.

please guys any thoughts (figured a way to put up pics for those who dont read text teams) cheers

Murphy > Beams
Betts > Caddy or Hawkins or M.Wright
 
So this is an idea someone else suggested, I'm not sure if it would be beneficial or not, but have a look at my proposed team. Does it look wrong?
The idea is to have 3 rucks, spread over all three bye rounds so can hopefully claw back 80-100 over the bye rounds (two rounds where a premium would be in the top 18 instead of a rookie). If Sandilands misses say 1 game before the byes, that could be equal to another 50-110 points depending on cover. But maybe the extra 300k spent on upgrading Thurlow to Jacobs could be spent better elsewhere?
Perhaps just having Dixon in the forwards would have the same effect?

upload_2014-2-28_0-31-9.png
 
So this is an idea someone else suggested, I'm not sure if it would be beneficial or not, but have a look at my proposed team. Does it look wrong?
The idea is to have 3 rucks, spread over all three bye rounds so can hopefully claw back 80-100 over the bye rounds (two rounds where a premium would be in the top 18 instead of a rookie). If Sandilands misses say 1 game before the byes, that could be equal to another 50-110 points depending on cover. But maybe the extra 300k spent on upgrading Thurlow to Jacobs could be spent better elsewhere?
Perhaps just having Dixon in the forwards would have the same effect?

View attachment 45002
Not sure having an extra ruck to cover the byes is a good thing. Your going to miss out on points in other positions as it forces you to have players like Darling higgins and Grimes who are pretty ordinary at best. No Mitchell or Mcveigh in the backs is a concern too. If i was going to pic 3 rucks though Jacobs wouldnt be one of them thats for sure
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top