Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thought I'd pop in to get a sense of your optimism and I'm surprised the majority don't seem confident.
I rate your midfield the best in the comp currently and you should smash us in clearances
I get that Hawk and Cameron will likely kick their share, they do even against the best anyway. This will be won in the midfield I think, I just hope our backline can absorb enough of your inside 50s.
Will be close I think!
Somebody needs to be the fall guy and it sure as shit aint gonna be one of the big names on the list.I'm not sure that who we select as the 22nd best player is the difference between winning and losing. Neither McComb nor McNeil are winning or losing the game for us. Team effort, discipline and an effective game plan will be more important.
The usual posters will absolutely melt at team selections over changes every week. The more anger and more melting usually means we are a decent chance to win (see last week's thread against the Dees ). I've learned this is just how some people vent and get their pre game nerves out so I just laugh now.Thought I'd pop in to get a sense of your optimism and I'm surprised the majority don't seem confident.
I rate your midfield the best in the comp currently and you should smash us in clearances
I get that Hawk and Cameron will likely kick their share, they do even against the best anyway. This will be won in the midfield I think, I just hope our backline can absorb enough of your inside 50s.
Will be close I think!
Who takes stengle? I'll cry if Buku does
When your 22nd player is a net negative on the team and makes costly turnovers every touch then yeah it can be the difference in a close game, especially the way we play which is so reliant on error free precision footy and completely prone to being cut up if we turn the footy over. Put it this way, the team will be better off this week if McComb just comes on as a rotation but has zero touches, then we would be if he has 15-20.I'm not sure that who we select as the 22nd best player is the difference between winning and losing. Neither McComb nor McNeil are winning or losing the game for us. Team effort, discipline and an effective game plan will be more important.
Cordy will take Hawkins he’s more physical and will be similar to Dixon in the prelim. Hunter has be shite with the ball and defensivelyLooks like Gardner takes Hawkins, Cordy takes Cameron, Buku takes Rohan. Does not instil confidence of keeping them to a losing score. Surely the Neil Mc is better than the Comb Mc but would be including Hunter in front of both.
Maybe Richards?I feel like Buku might go to Rohan and maybe Hannan to Stengle. We are pretty short in that small - medium defender without Duryea.
Yeah ideally he goes to a less dangerous fwd in my mind so he is able to help come off and intercept / spoil when the big boys are wrestling, but we'll see...Maybe Richards?
I agree it's a big deficiency in our back line.Yeah ideally he goes to a less dangerous fwd in my mind so he is able to help come off and intercept / spoil when the big boys are wrestling, but we'll see...
Forward lines great midfields great, we can win - just would be nice to give ourselves the best chance at it for once.You’ll all eat your words at 10pm on Saturday
It's often a lot worse.Most in here seem to think that playing one single player over another determines the outcome of our games.
Is the cats selection thread a circus like this every Thursday?