Opinion Non-Crows AFL 5: Save Ken

[1970crow]

They can if they retire when under contract which Jones was. It's actually mentioned in the rules.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.aflplayers.com.au/app/u...AQFnoECCoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2m5YmiHVKAs5lR5SCFVmh6

On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app

I don’t think that’s applicable here though. Wasn’t he effectively deregistered? Anything in the papers about him retiring would have just been part of the settlement to forego any future claims. He was sacked and delisted. Which was applauded feverishly at the time.

 

[NSolis]

With another years development, adding Dawson, and virtually no injuries to speak of, matching last year is a catastrophe

Utter failure that literally no one expected or foresaw

We do have two season-long injuries to players who finished top 10 in our B&F last year, and we traded another one of that top 10 out. Average team age is about the same as last year (actually lower I think, marginally), and during the season we've moved on a couple of other experienced players in favour of younger options. This is all by way of saying that I'm not sure our actual playing list is any more developed than last year, even if a year has passed.

Matching last year certainly isn't a good result but I don't think it's a catastrophe mostly because I think a larger portion of our good players this year are early career players who are developing. Hanging a lot on Berry and Soligo though, honestly.

 

[MarcusP2]

I don’t think that’s applicable here though. Wasn’t he effectively deregistered? Anything in the papers about him retiring would have just been part of the settlement to forego any future claims. He was sacked and delisted. Which was applauded feverishly at the time.

He had the option to stay on the list and not get paid. He refused and retired.

On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

GOLD, having a sook too
View attachment 1458753

Should put another sticker on saying sign him up for another 5 years... with a Crows emblem.

 

[1970crow]

He had the option to stay on the list and not get paid. He refused and retired.

On Pixel 5 using BigFooty.com mobile app

Looks like it’s the rule that I reckon came into being after mal Michael returned after ‘retiring’. So technically can’t come back at all.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

Looks like it’s the rule that I reckon came into being after mal Michael returned after ‘retiring’. So technically can’t come back at all.

View attachment 1459133

Looks like it’s one of those AFL rules that only applies when the AFL wants it to

 

[ams4crows]

Liam Baker

7

Liam Baker

Age

26

Ht

173cm

Wt

72kg

Pos.

D/F

Career

Season

Last 5

D

15.7

4star

K

7.8

3star

HB

7.9

5star

M

3.2

3star

T

2.6

4star

MG

222.2

3star

D

14.6

4star

K

6.8

3star

HB

7.9

4star

M

3.8

4star

T

1.8

3star

MG

191.9

3star

D

14.4

4star

K

6.2

3star

HB

8.2

5star

M

1.6

2star

T

1.8

4star

MG

224.2

4star

is staying at Richmond for another 2 years

 

[1970crow]

He's still on our list as he "retired" after the final list lodgment date.

The issue is that the current rules mandate that any retiree must sit outside the game for 18 months before returning.

He/Bulldogs want him to return after 12 months - given that he was forced to sit out due to a rule outside of Carlton's control, and that Carlton have still had to pay him out while he continues to occupy a list spot - they are seeking for compensation in the form of losing him as a free agent.

Sounds like he's still your player and you just frontloaded his contract. Whether he considers that to be retirement is a personal definition and not relevant to the mechanics. You should just be able to trade him as you would any other listed player.

 

[Punchy Bassett]

I'm shocked at how strongly Hinkley's reacted to that sign! Must have really hit a nerve.

 

[FR0GGY]

I'm shocked at how strongly Hinkley's reacted to that sign! Must have really hit a nerve.

Someone should stick a “sack nicks” over it or a “have nicks” under it.

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

 

[SugarShane]

Interesting reading on the Useless AFL Stats page. A table of which clubs have broken the 12 day sub rule this year. Not much of a surprise at the top top top.

Source: Useless AFL Stats

 

[Slippery Pete]

What would Hinkley’s salary be?

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/news/afl-round-20-collingwood-v-port-adelaide-all-the-news-action-and-fallout-from-the-mcg/news-story/05b140264fc59846b3eb4c0b2e3e7f4d

Port Adelaide will be denied the chance to wear its prison-bar jumper in Round 23 with the AFL making it clear the Power can only broker a long-term agreement with Collingwood’s approval.
The Power had been hopeful soft diplomacy could resolve the longstanding impasse after it was revealed last month an official request had been made for the home Round 23 clash with the Crows.

But the league has made clear it will not be able to approve any request for a game to be played in coming weeks, having previously told the Power it is prevented from the use of the historic jumper under AFL rules.


Lol and then, lol again

 

[refused_]

Who was our player?

Interesting reading on the Useless AFL Stats page. A table of which clubs have broken the 12 day sub rule this year. Not much of a surprise at the top top top.

Source: Useless AFL Stats

View attachment 1459582

 

[Truck25]

LOL, Sent to me by a "friend" offering to sign me up. haha. pump up the membership numbers by giving away free "digital Memberships" and a $30.00 voucher for each one referred. so buying numbers.

 

[MatthewB]

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/news/afl-round-20-collingwood-v-port-adelaide-all-the-news-action-and-fallout-from-the-mcg/news-story/05b140264fc59846b3eb4c0b2e3e7f4d

Port Adelaide will be denied the chance to wear its prison-bar jumper in Round 23 with the AFL making it clear the Power can only broker a long-term agreement with Collingwood’s approval.
The Power had been hopeful soft diplomacy could resolve the longstanding impasse after it was revealed last month an official request had been made for the home Round 23 clash with the Crows.

But the league has made clear it will not be able to approve any request for a game to be played in coming weeks, having previously told the Power it is prevented from the use of the historic jumper under AFL rules.


Lol and then, lol again

 

[Punchy Bassett]

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/news/afl-round-20-collingwood-v-port-adelaide-all-the-news-action-and-fallout-from-the-mcg/news-story/05b140264fc59846b3eb4c0b2e3e7f4d

Port Adelaide will be denied the chance to wear its prison-bar jumper in Round 23 with the AFL making it clear the Power can only broker a long-term agreement with Collingwood’s approval.
The Power had been hopeful soft diplomacy could resolve the longstanding impasse after it was revealed last month an official request had been made for the home Round 23 clash with the Crows.

But the league has made clear it will not be able to approve any request for a game to be played in coming weeks, having previously told the Power it is prevented from the use of the historic jumper under AFL rules.


Lol and then, lol again

We all know their agenda here, if they came out publicly and said they'd sign an agreement saying we'd only wear it in our home Showdown and that's it the AFL would let them.

 

[Peter Doherty]

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/news/afl-round-20-collingwood-v-port-adelaide-all-the-news-action-and-fallout-from-the-mcg/news-story/05b140264fc59846b3eb4c0b2e3e7f4d

Port Adelaide will be denied the chance to wear its prison-bar jumper in Round 23 with the AFL making it clear the Power can only broker a long-term agreement with Collingwood’s approval.
The Power had been hopeful soft diplomacy could resolve the longstanding impasse after it was revealed last month an official request had been made for the home Round 23 clash with the Crows.

But the league has made clear it will not be able to approve any request for a game to be played in coming weeks, having previously told the Power it is prevented from the use of the historic jumper under AFL rules.


Lol and then, lol again

Just heard Rowie and some other bloke saying Port Power should wear the jumper, lose premiership, then improve their draft position as a result.

There would actually be Power losers out there getting their hopes up about pick 1 now AND they get the prison bars,

Delusions of grandeur that mob.

 

[TubbsFarquhar]

Who was our player?

McAdam last week.

 

[kirky]

We all know their agenda here, if they came out publicly and said they'd sign an agreement saying we'd only wear it in our home Showdown and that's it the AFL would let them.

Why not make the black teal? Because they feel persecuted, typical Port response.

 

[screech]

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/news/afl-round-20-collingwood-v-port-adelaide-all-the-news-action-and-fallout-from-the-mcg/news-story/05b140264fc59846b3eb4c0b2e3e7f4d

Port Adelaide will be denied the chance to wear its prison-bar jumper in Round 23 with the AFL making it clear the Power can only broker a long-term agreement with Collingwood’s approval.
The Power had been hopeful soft diplomacy could resolve the longstanding impasse after it was revealed last month an official request had been made for the home Round 23 clash with the Crows.

But the league has made clear it will not be able to approve any request for a game to be played in coming weeks, having previously told the Power it is prevented from the use of the historic jumper under AFL rules.


Lol and then, lol again

Very predictable this would be raised again, seems to happen everytime Hinkley is under pressure.

A nice distraction that can re-unite the supporter base.

 

[kirky]

Just heard Rowie and some other bloke saying Port Power should wear the jumper, lose premiership, then improve their draft position as a result.

There would actually be Power losers out there getting their hopes up about pick 1 now AND they get the prison bars,

Delusions of grandeur that mob.

They would only lose premiership points for those games they won, wearing it.

Just diarise it for a couple of weeks before every showdown.

 

[Peter Doherty]

They would only lose premiership points for those games they won, wearing it.

Just diarise it for a couple of weeks before every showdown.

They would never improve their draft position as a result.

 

[SugarShane]

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/news/afl-round-20-collingwood-v-port-adelaide-all-the-news-action-and-fallout-from-the-mcg/news-story/05b140264fc59846b3eb4c0b2e3e7f4d

Port Adelaide will be denied the chance to wear its prison-bar jumper in Round 23 with the AFL making it clear the Power can only broker a long-term agreement with Collingwood’s approval.
The Power had been hopeful soft diplomacy could resolve the longstanding impasse after it was revealed last month an official request had been made for the home Round 23 clash with the Crows.

But the league has made clear it will not be able to approve any request for a game to be played in coming weeks, having previously told the Power it is prevented from the use of the historic jumper under AFL rules.


Lol and then, lol again

Port: Adelaide are a plastic franchise with no history.

Also Port: Pwetty pwease can we wear our special shirt for Adelaide? They're so special we deserve to wear our special shirt against them.