I like Pitto, just prefer ruckmen to be a threat forward and have a greater impact around the ground
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pitto is still ruck-young, strong at the contest, with uncanny awareness of surrounding midfielders.
Stay uninjured 'Brad', this could be your/our year.
As you say, TDK was the ruck against Gold Coast and also St Kilda. Yes Pitto was well beaten by Gawn but Gawn will end up a top 5 ruck of all time plus we still won the clearances that game.The only worry with Pitto is he does tend to get touched up by the very tall rucks. Witts and Gawn generally dominate. We lost to GC with Witts giving their mids an armchair ride all game (though that was against TDK).
I'd like to see us be brave with Mirkov and play him against those teams. He'd have done his job if he can win or spoil the hitouts - which would deny the opposition their only realistic way of beating us. I think the ruck contest cost us agains the Saints too when Ryder and Marshall killed us and we lost. Without that ruck domination we'd have won that by a landslide.
Maybe Mirkov isn't ready yet but at 210cm with a massive vertical leap I think he should be at least able to spoil the opposition hitouts.
I may be misremembering but I'm pretty sure he hasn't played against Witts and has done a reasonable job against Gawn, at the stoppage anyway.The only worry with Pitto is he does tend to get touched up by the very tall rucks. Witts and Gawn generally dominate. We lost to GC with Witts giving their mids an armchair ride all game (though that was against TDK).
I'd like to see us be brave with Mirkov and play him against those teams. He'd have done his job if he can win or spoil the hitouts - which would deny the opposition their only realistic way of beating us. I think the ruck contest cost us agains the Saints too when Ryder and Marshall killed us and we lost. Without that ruck domination we'd have won that by a landslide.
Maybe Mirkov isn't ready yet but at 210cm with a massive vertical leap I think he should be at least able to spoil the opposition hitouts.
On a rookie wage, possibly bloody good depthProbably an unpopular opinion, but I’d take Polec on a 1-year deal.
The guy was a gun at Port, obviously things didn’t pan out at North but he has a couple of great years at the Power.
Maybe he’s surplus with Acres on board but he’s too good a player to already be out of the system.
Isn’t he struggling with injuries?Probably an unpopular opinion, but I’d take Polec on a 1-year deal.
The guy was a gun at Port, obviously things didn’t pan out at North but he has a couple of great years at the Power.
Maybe he’s surplus with Acres on board but he’s too good a player to already be out of the system.
that's why we take him, assimilation into the team is quick and easy...........Isn’t he struggling with injuries?
We are the new Medicarethat's why we take him, assimilation into the team is quick and easy...........
We are the destination club because we bulk bill.We are the new Medicare
Pitto don't jump, but he's pretty good at absorbing the impact of more athletic ruckmen and then directing the ball to our advantage.
TDK can jump and mark but has no idea where to place the ball and gets easily 'worked out' by other teams.
They're both still young and inexperienced. With a 5 man interchange looming, they're differences could present an interesting match-up challenge.
Not a fan? "complete liability", "zero impact", "destroyed at boundary throw ins", that's as strong and harsh a criticism of any ruckman that I have read. That pretty much renders him useless.Biggest issue with Pitto is he is a complete liability as soon as the ball leaves the centre square, he has zero impact around the ground. and his opposing ruckmen usually feasts. There may be stats that prove me wrong, but i also reckon Pitto gets destroyed at boundary throw ins, especially inside 50 which can be costly.