Preview 2022 draft prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm a fan of Gruzewski & love this:

There were confronting scenes towards the end of the 2km time trial when exhausted Eastern Ranges key defender Lewis Hayes collapsed just before the finish line.

But Sandringham Dragons utility Max Gruzewski, who was just behind Hayes, stopped his run to help Hayes to his feet and carry him across the finish line in a beautiful act of sportsmanship.

Speaking to the Herald Sun, Gruzewski said he didn’t help Hayes purely to impress recruiters, revealing he’d roomed with Hayes during the combine and had gotten to know him well.

“‘Hayesy’ was struggling at the end and I think my mate’s health and how he was feeling was more important than a running race, so I thought I should help him out,”
 
Was going to post this, but didn’t for fear of being shot down and beaten by the mob.
Why not take all three, one makes it big time is still more than a pass for this draft.
Two make it and we’re doing cart wheels.
Three and we’ve won the f**king lottery

If we only get one KPF out this draft, job done and three highly rated talls (last year especially) spreads the risk…
:tearsofjoy: be brave. Exactly right, could skip Lemmey and grab Cowan or Hotton, after reading posts on Lemmey, he might be a lemon.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

3.17 and 8.73 in the 20 m and agility respectively

Rank Time (seconds) Name
1 7.702 Darcy Jones
2 8.182 Jaxon Binns
3 8.217 Elijah Hewett
4 8.247 Steely Green
5 8.255 Edward Allan
6 8.267 Luke Teal
7 8.285 Toby McMullin
8 8.292 Jacob Konstanty
9 8.325 Harry Rowston
10 8.343 Noah Long

The publicly available 10th at the National combine (which included no key position players) was 8.343.

On the face of if 8.73 doesn’t seem too bad.

Bloody annoying that this information isn’t easily available and the AFL doesn’t just have a proper repository for all things draft prospects (Links to any televised games, testing results etc).

Is there a reason you guys don’t post them PmBangers?
 
Was going to post this, but didn’t for fear of being shot down and beaten by the mob.
Why not take all three, one makes it big time is still more than a pass for this draft.
Two make it and we’re doing cart wheels.
Three and we’ve won the f**king lottery

If we only get one KPF out this draft, job done and three highly rated talls (last year especially) spreads the risk…
Zhoung, we are all armchair warriors, post away
 
Last edited:
Rank Time (seconds) Name
1 7.702 Darcy Jones
2 8.182 Jaxon Binns
3 8.217 Elijah Hewett
4 8.247 Steely Green
5 8.255 Edward Allan
6 8.267 Luke Teal
7 8.285 Toby McMullin
8 8.292 Jacob Konstanty
9 8.325 Harry Rowston
10 8.343 Noah Long

The publicly available 10th at the National combine (which included no key position players) was 8.343.

On the face of if 8.73 doesn’t seem too bad.

Bloody annoying that this information isn’t easily available and the AFL doesn’t just have a proper repository for all things draft prospects (Links to any televised games, testing results etc).

Is there a reason you guys don’t post them PmBangers?
Not allowed to due to AFL restrictions, RMC dont even get access to them through RookieMe, we rely on the generosity of contacts within recruiting circles to gibe us some of interest

It's pretty good for a tall, looks like only Cadman, Jefferson, Northem, Van Es and Verrell did better of the KPPs that tested
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't know if it's been an attitude change or simply that that draft was viewed as a nirvana of talls. First round was 16 picks - there were 10kpps taken, and a ruck. With another 4 KPPs and two rucks in the second round. Everyone was drafting tall.
I believe it is partly an attitude change (we lacked a spine but had good smalls and mids) on how he views thier importance and also the strike rate with them vs mids and flankers.

This draft at the end of last year was also viewed as a heavy KPP rich draft.
But they either haven't come on or have questions still lingering around most of them.

Just look.

Cadman, Jefferson, Busslinger, Burnett, Keeler, Lemmey, Scully, Hayes, etc.

All of them at stages have been talked up over the last 24 months.

Will be interesting to see how he picks.
 
I believe it is partly an attitude change (we lacked a spine but had good smalls and mids) on how he views thier importance and also the strike rate with them vs mids and flankers.

This draft at the end of last year was also viewed as a heavy KPP rich draft.
But they either haven't come on or have questions still lingering around most of them.

Just look.

Cadman, Jefferson, Busslinger, Burnett, Keeler, Lemmey, Scully, Hayes, etc.

All of them at stages have been talked up over the last 24 months.

Will be interesting to see how he picks.
Yes, but that group doesn't run anywhere near as deep as 2006. 12 out of the first 17 drafted were talls - we'll probably never see anything like it again. Hine supposedly rated the talls in 2020, but couldn't get up into the top 10 where they went.

I'm hoping for a couple of Busslinger, Barnett, Keeler and Hayes. With Barnett and Hayes sounding the two most likely for us. But who am I to say, if we go for different types again.
 
Yes, but that group doesn't run anywhere near as deep as 2006. 12 out of the first 17 drafted were talls - we'll probably never see anything like it again. Hine supposedly rated the talls in 2020, but couldn't get up into the top 10 where they went.

I'm hoping for a couple of Busslinger, Barnett, Keeler and Hayes. With Barnett and Hayes sounding the two most likely for us. But who am I to say, if we go for different types again.

Van Es reads well too
 
Not allowed to due to AFL restrictions, RMC dont even get access to them through RookieMe, we rely on the generosity of contacts within recruiting circles to gibe us some of interest

It's pretty good for a tall, looks like only Cadman, Jefferson, Northem, Van Es and Verrell did better of the KPPs that tested
Van Es is an interesting one - footage and athleticism both appear stronger than Lemmey's.
 
Not allowed to due to AFL restrictions, RMC dont even get access to them through RookieMe, we rely on the generosity of contacts within recruiting circles to gibe us some of interest

It's pretty good for a tall, looks like only Cadman, Jefferson, Northem, Van Es and Verrell did better of the KPPs that tested

Well that’s pretty sh!tty by the AFL. Especially if they aren’t using them for their own commercial purposes.
 
Van Es is an interesting one - footage and athleticism both appear stronger than Lemmey's.

The thing is it doesn't have to be Lemmey.

People just very familiar with Lemmey as he was talked up as a top prospect in 2021.

That's up to our recruiting team. I think it's more there is a feel that a couple of good prospects should be available at our last 3 picks and that we could load up tall and see what comes of it.
The prospect of hitting it at those picks are low anyway might as well try go for broke.

Get best available with our first rounder then go tall for long term list development. As someone else said a 3 kpp/ruck and even if only 1 comes on that is a success if more come on you look genius.

If none come on then we just need to point to most drafts where 80% are delisted after pick 30 anyway.
 
The thing is it doesn't have to be Lemmey.

People just very familiar with Lemmey as he was talked up as a top prospect in 2021.

That's up to our recruiting team. I think it's more there is a feel that a couple of good prospects should be available at our last 3 picks and that we could load up tall and see what comes of it.
The prospect of hitting it at those picks are low anyway might as well try go for broke.

Get best available with our first rounder then go tall for long term list development. As someone else said a 3 kpp/ruck and even if only 1 comes on that is a success if more come on you look genius.

If none come on then we just need to point to most drafts where 80% are delisted after pick 30 anyway.
I'd normally disagree with you. Later picks are less chance of being a hit, so I don't think you want to be crossing off a huge section of the field because they're the wrong player type. But this year seems like talls in that range are more likely than they usually are, so I'd be all for it.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview 2022 draft prospects

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top