- May 18, 2022
- 4,016
- 5,502
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Washington Wizards
Like De Goey promised not to let Buckley down?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
In the ones where he had no impact.
AFL is an unforgiving game, and especially so in finals. If you don’t hunt with aggression you don’t get rewarded, unless you’re an elite outside uncontested type that knows where to run and when!
Ed Allen in 5th, at 6’ 4” is v impressive. As is Jones obviously. Would be v happy with both, with a tall or sliding jet to round it outRank Time (seconds) Name
1 7.702 Darcy Jones
2 8.182 Jaxon Binns
3 8.217 Elijah Hewett
4 8.247 Steely Green
5 8.255 Edward Allan
6 8.267 Luke Teal
7 8.285 Toby McMullin
8 8.292 Jacob Konstanty
9 8.325 Harry Rowston
10 8.343 Noah Long
The publicly available 10th at the National combine (which included no key position players) was 8.343.
On the face of if 8.73 doesn’t seem too bad.
Bloody annoying that this information isn’t easily available and the AFL doesn’t just have a proper repository for all things draft prospects (Links to any televised games, testing results etc).
Is there a reason you guys don’t post them PmBangers?
Cadman is now 196cm and 90kg
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
“No impact” - is very different to being timid.In the ones where he had no impact.
AFL is an unforgiving game, and especially so in finals. If you don’t hunt with aggression you don’t get rewarded, unless you’re an elite outside uncontested type that knows where to run and when!
Give me Keeler and I'm happy.Not Keeler then?
Lock him in now Thx
I heard somewhere he struggled with long Covid for much of the year. He’s a strange case really, because he had a great year last year, and impressed enough as a 17 year old to gain a senior SANFL berth (and also performed well there iirc) in 2021. He hasn’t just stagnated this year, he’s had a significantly worse year, and I can’t help but feel like there’s external forces (ie. illness) at play and that in hindsight he’ll end up being drafted far later than he really should have been.The suggestion that Lemmey was holding back is pretty ludicrous. I watched the Metro vs SA game again the other day to have a another look at Jakob Ryan (who I thought looked just ok) and also got another showing from Lemmy. So while Jefferson, who according to some on here has terminal flaws was kicking goals, Lemmey who's going to be a major steal, literally couldnt touch the footy, looked slow and timid, and at one point I felt a bit sorry for him because he was clearly trying his hardest and the look on his face was knowing how bad it was going. He had no possessions until the third quarter and then was moved back, and luckily had a kick fall to him for his only touch of the game. He just hasn't come on this year as expected, he's not tanking.
With his 192cm, I'd enjoy page after page of hopeful talk of him adding another inch or two - all being patiently rebuffed by Gone CriticalLock him in now Thx
They have no choice I suppose. Not much left.Scully similar situation, though Richmond keen with their late picks in the ND
Maybe he wasn't performing so they were trying to get something out of him.It's worth noting that Lemmey was played out of position during the year as part of his development.
As well as the valid points you raise, Lemmey played FF, high H/F, in the ruck as well as the backline.
It's hardly a wonder he had an indifferent year.
Yeh, Tony Bamford stated as muchMaybe he wasn't performing so they were trying to get something out of him.
I would also expect experienced recruiters would be aware of something like that.
But then again. I have no idea. He may well be picked in the 1st round.
I'd normally disagree with you. Later picks are less chance of being a hit, so I don't think you want to be crossing off a huge section of the field because they're the wrong player type. But this year seems like talls in that range are more likely than they usually are, so I'd be all for it.
Where did pick 79 come from, I thought we only had 4 live picks?16, 25, 27, 51, 79
We're only going to take a maximum of 4, because we're going to re-rookie Murley, but technically we have 5 spots available, so we take 5 picks into the draft. They award you extra picks at the end of the draft for each spot you have available.Where did pick 79 come from, I thought we only had 4 live picks?
Technically we do have 5 spots available, as Murley has been delisted and isn't on the rookie list yet. So we can change our list profile from 36 + 6 to 37 +5 - giving us an extra theoretical senior list spot - which we're not going to use, because we'll keep it open for Murley in the rookie draft.Not sure. I don’t think we have 5 senior spots available
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
No pressure, no possessions and no goals means no impact.“No impact” - is very different to being timid.
Maynard has had games with little impact, but that doesn’t make him timid.
Technically we do have 5 spots available, as Murley has been delisted and isn't on the rookie list yet. So we can change our list profile from 36 + 6 to 37 +5 - giving us an extra theoretical senior list spot - which we're not going to use.
Liked the old system better.Technically we do have 5 spots available, as Murley has been delisted and isn't on the rookie list yet. So we can change our list profile from 36 + 6 to 37 +5 - giving us an extra theoretical senior list spot - which we're not going to use, because we'll keep it open for Murley in the rookie draft.
Correct. He's in the same position as Hugh Greenwood was last year when the Roos signed him as a DFA - although I think the DFA window may have closed.Liked the old system better.
I assume murley for the time being is a DFA & could potentially be drafted in the ND, PSD or before us in the RD effectively opening up the 5th spot for a newbie in the rookie draft
When you watch him in highlights reels bounding away from players, it's hard to reconcile with that sprint time.Don't know with regards to Lemmey, but Keeler's 20 meter sprint was 3.019 sec's EFA Thx manicpie
With improved fitness and the baby fat gone I think he improves here & when he get's going he builds up speed & cover's the ground well