List Mgmt. 2023 List Management and Trading

[spenze]

Using 4 and 9 this year

Then matching Welsh and trying to get a FA next year is what we should be aiming at

Any decent FAs next year?

Mids only

 

[Tex Danger]

if we don’t get pick 4 but say GC took 10 as part of the deal for it and then had 10 on the table would we go for it and at what price?

I can certainly see a scenario where something like that is where it gets to

 

[1970crow]

Dowling has been superb. We forget how young these new guys are. What did Sloane, Crouch and Laird do in their first senior year?

reckon crouch racked them up from the get go. Couldn't get past Thommo though, understandable at the time.

 

[Rory Walkerfield]

if we don’t get pick 4 but say GC took 10 as part of the deal for it and then had 10 on the table would we go for it and at what price?

I can certainly see a scenario where something like that is where it gets to

Huh?

 

[1990crow]

if we don’t get pick 4 but say GC took 10 as part of the deal for it and then had 10 on the table would we go for it and at what price?

I can certainly see a scenario where something like that is where it gets to

 

[Tex Danger]

Huh?

I can see GC accepting an offer from someone else over ours but that then sees them further splitting something obtained in that trade

In my example they get pick 10 as part of that deal and move that on for more points again, how interested would we be in getting on that secondary phase

 

[DJ75]

What do you think it would take for Mcluggage to pack his suitcases and come to the Crows

Jesus to appear and force him

 

[Rory Walkerfield]

I can see GC accepting an offer from someone else over ours but that then sees them further splitting something obtained in that trade

In my example they get pick 10 as part of that deal and move that on for more points again, how interested would we be in getting on that secondary phase

Ahhh. I see.

 

[Crows I Am]

He looked like an inside Dawson last night. Similar leg and brains but a bit more burley and brawn would be amazing for us his impact was huge last night. Is he from SA?

No he is from Vic, so if he did decide to leave it would more than likely be back there. But we should be talking to him and other non SA guys if we think they will improve our midfield.

Money always talks, and if we can offer him $150k more per year than the Lions then he may be tempted.

 

[CharlieCrow]

I was just going by his twitter bio

View attachment 1799061

You know, on second thoughts, I think you're right. He might be a Carlton flog. And I guess I don't know him so well.

 

[Sanders]

It's 100% a rule. Shouldn't be.

Not sure about that: it’s definitely a rule on draft night; but future drafts? Not so sure?

 

[ams4crows]

Bulldogs already in talks with gold coast about pick 4, other than an article saying we are positioned well to offer something decent has there been any media confirming we are interested in moving up?

 

[Grooster24]

Not sure about that: it’s definitely a rule on draft night; but future drafts? Not so sure?

Yes. Thought it was to stop a team trading their pick while they match a F/S only to trade it back. Effectively parking it with another club to protect it.

 

[DJ75]

If the stories about us wanting a player from Melbourne for McAdam are true, how about the following outrageously impossible scenario:

Out:
McAdam (to Melb)

In:
Grundy (straight swap, but we are only paying $600k of Grundy salary)

Out:
O'Brien (to North)

In:
Pick 39, Future 2nd

Out:
9, 20, 23, (To GC)

In:
Pick 4 + Hollands

Draft Zane Duursma at #4

Result:

OUT: McAdam, O'Brien, Pick 9, 20 and 23

IN: Zane Duursma, Grundy, Hollands, pick 39 and future 2nd round
(North)

 

[FR0GGY]

Yes. Thought it was to stop a team trading their pick while they match a F/S only to trade it back. Effectively parking it with another club to protect it.

Just can’t see any reason why it would be only for the same draft.

 

[Vader]

If the stories about us wanting a player from Melbourne for McAdam are true, how about the following outrageously impossible scenario:

Out:
McAdam (to Melb)

In:
Grundy (straight swap, but we are only paying $600k of Grundy salary)

Out:
O'Brien (to North)

In:
Pick 39, Future 2nd

Why TF would Adelaide trade out ROB, only to trade in Grundy?

You do realise we're talking about 2023 Grundy, not 2019 Grundy? Grundy is absolutely cooked, and in no way an upgrade on ROB.

 

[DJ75]

Why TF would Adelaide trade out ROB, only to trade in Grundy?

You do realise we're talking about 2023 Grundy, not 2019 Grundy? Grundy is absolutely cooked, and in no way an upgrade on ROB.

I 100% agree with you. Grundy is cooked.
ROB is also shit though. So

I'm genuinely struggling to see what player we might want from Melbourne for McAdam.

 

[rabidcrow]

I 100% agree with you. Grundy is cooked.
ROB is also s**t though. So

I'm genuinely struggling to see what player we might want from Melbourne for McAdam.

Leverage for a better pick. Act outraged/ angry and ask for what you won’t get. I doubt there is a contracted Melbourne player keen to leave their premiership window to come here. You would imagine we are trying for Sparrow

Having said that maybe we are concerned with the LTI for Harry, Murray and Doedee if he stays and want another option.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[LoBu]

Pardon the interruption but given Sid Draper and Welsh look like pretty high draft picks next year, how does this look for Crows fans:

OUT
Crows 9, 20, 23, F1 (9) (4665 points)
GCS 4, 32 (2618 points)
WCE F1 (1), 35, 38, 54, 57 (4389 points)

IN
WCE Pick 4, 9 (3503 points)
Crows 32, 35, 38 WCE F1 (1) (4571 points)
GCS 20, 23, 54, 57 Crows F1 (9) (3598 points)

**F1s are assumed to be ladder position, which for WCE I can’t see us finishing higher than anyone except North Melbourne and I think the Crows could easily crack into the finals next year.

I think it would worth a shot to get WCE first 2024, but I'm not sure we can give up that much.

If there was deal where we kept our pick 9 this year, I'd be all in.

We likely have picks coming in for Doedee and McAdam, so don't need all those picks in the 30s either.

 

[eaglevision]

I think it would worth a shot to get WCE first 2024, but I'm not sure we can give up that much.

If there was deal where we kept our pick 9 this year, I'd be all in.

We likely have picks coming in for Doedee and McAdam, so don't need all those picks in the 30s either.

The pick 9 this year would be crucial for us to get a KPD so would probably need to be involved. What picks are you expecting to land for Doedee and McAdam?

 

[Golumless]

I 100% agree with you. Grundy is cooked.
ROB is also s**t though. So

I'm genuinely struggling to see what player we might want from Melbourne for McAdam.

James Jordon stands out as an OOC and as a bit of a low-value buy, but that doesn't quite equate to McAdam value.

 

[BRL121]

James Jordon stands out as an OOC and as a bit of a low-value buy, but that doesn't quite equate to McAdam value.

No. I would accept Swallow, but nothing lesser in value.

 

[Jarman3]

I 100% agree with you. Grundy is cooked.
ROB is also s**t though. So

I'm genuinely struggling to see what player we might want from Melbourne for McAdam.

I don't see much value trading out one mediocre ruckman for another, older mediocre ruckman.

I know it's been mentioned that we're after a player, but Melbourne don't really have anyone I want that would actually be willing to come here, especially not for McAdam trade value. I'd settle for their future 2nd (you'd assume they'll be around the mark again next year, so it'll be a late 2nd) to put towards points for Welsh next year.

 

[WaynesWorld19]

If the stories about us wanting a player from Melbourne for McAdam are true, how about the following outrageously impossible scenario:

Out:
McAdam (to Melb)

In:
Grundy (straight swap, but we are only paying $600k of Grundy salary)

Out:
O'Brien (to North)

In:
Pick 39, Future 2nd

Out:
9, 20, 23, (To GC)

In:
Pick 4 + Hollands

Draft Zane Duursma at #4

Result:

OUT: McAdam, O'Brien, Pick 9, 20 and 23

IN: Zane Duursma, Grundy, Hollands, pick 39 and future 2nd round
(North)

Hang-on for 5 ....my people are just working this out ....shouldn't be long

 

[DJ75]

Hang-on for 5 ....my people are just working this out ....shouldn't be long

View attachment 1799811

Gonna need more computer power than that...