List Mgmt. 2023 Trade Thread - Part II

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it that we give them both our firsts (Gresham and natural FRD pick) for 8 and we take Shiel off their books to pay Gresham more? I'd rather have the 2 first round picks.
If the reports of there being no genuine star mids by that point then absolutely we should keep 12/13.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is it that we give them both our firsts (Gresham and natural FRD pick) for 8 and we take Shiel off their books to pay Gresham more? I'd rather have the 2 first round picks.
If we trade up has to be in the top 5, pick 8 would not get us a quality midfielder.
 
sos is working for essendon or hes completely hypnotised by dodo if its going this way,someone at the club put a stop to the whole thing

take band 2 and byebye gresh if it comes to that

they have a hard nosed businessman albeit the butt of everyones jokes,we have a clown

if dodo wants to go out a hero dont have us be the ones he gets there on,pull sos out of there now

if that compo pick goes to essendon,we are not even close to being a serious club

lose gresh for a 31yo crock even if i assume they are paying his salary & they load up on 2 first round draft picks before the compromised years/no way gtf outa here

band 2,no sweetheart deals,we get 2 picks in the top 25 or whatever & dont gift them what we are supposed to be doing,going to the draft

i remember sos on trade radio describing dodo as the marlon brando of list managers,sos is enamoured,get him the hell out
 
Very early doors. But possibility of another player on his last legs with a pick incoming

So now it's Gresham and pick 13 for Shiel?! That's horrendous if true.

what-a-time-to-be-alive-v0-jb67hae4akbb1.jpg
 
FYI Shiel has a foot injury that is somewhat "persistent".

Essendon wont have him in preseason training until after Christmas. Modified program before that.

Not that it means much, but he's already carrying...
Means the pick we give up for him can be even lower. Good news for us
 
Is it that we give them both our firsts (Gresham and natural FRD pick) for 8 and we take Shiel off their books to pay Gresham more? I'd rather have the 2 first round picks.
Walk away from the deal, get what we get for Gresham and let them keep Shiel, it must be remembered they want him out - we don't need another injury prone player.
 
Surely surely surely for the love of everything that is good and holy we are not going to give up anything bar an extremely late draft pick for Dylan Shiel for Christs sake. Would be one of the dumbest trades in history if we did what the Herald Sun are suggesting.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ralph seems to think Essendon will get 13 or 19 and Gresham and we will get Shiel. Doesn’t break any of the AFLs rules. Essendon paying Gresh 750k is reasonable with new CBA in his view.
Hahahaha good luck selling thst deal to SOS. Even the worst list managers in St Kilda history would walk away.
 
Exactly People are misunderstanding. WE get 13 and Shiel , they get Gresham and part of his salary paid by us. In effect we are paying for his compo pick to be Band 1. Essendon DO NOT get a pick from us. Gresh is a FA remember
Unfortunately if you read the article it says we give the compo pick back to Essendon for Sheil

The benefit for St.Kilda is we get Greshams salary off the book (he conviently forgets Sheil is on 200k more) and we get a hard running midfielder who was top ten midfielder (before he became a clapped out old injury bust).

Yes that is the benefit to St.Kilda we get a higher salary for a 31 year old and no compo for a Free Agency. Wow what a boon for the mighty Saints.
Fair Dinkum.
 
To be fair, Essendon’s injury management/ strength and conditioning have been borderline negligent for the last few years. So many players go there and end up with chronic injuries. Hopefully, Shiel’s injuries are few and far between if he comes.
Didn’t we get their boss after Nick Walsh left?
 
Unfortunately if you read the article it says we give the compo pick back to Essendon for Sheil

The benefit for St.Kilda is we get Greshams salary off the book (he conviently forgets Sheil is on 200k more) and we get a hard running midfielder who was top ten midfielder (before he became a clapped out old injury bust).

Yes that is the benefit to St.Kilda we get a higher salary for a 31 year old and no compo for a Free Agency. Wow what a boon for the mighty Saints.
Fair Dinkum.
If Gresham's contract has run out and he doesn't want to renew it, isn't it already off the books without us needing to take on Shiel or hand back the compensation pick?
 
Ralph seems to think Essendon will get 13 or 19 and Gresham and we will get Shiel. Doesn’t break any of the AFLs rules. Essendon paying Gresh 750k is reasonable with new CBA in his view.
How’s the write up. Funniest thing I have ever read. Shiel’s mum scribed that. He’s a star and Gresham hasn’t even kicked a goal a game … Ralphy had a lobotomy, right?
 
Herald Sun is telling us and we're all panicking.

We would just walk away and get Gresh to the Hawks or someone if the deal was that bad.
100%, let him get a band 2 or 3 compo rather than that trainwreck of a deal.

Or match the bid and force a trade. Ralphy has lost his shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top