List Mgmt. 2024 Trade Thread - No.2

[Winmar2Lockett]

Hasn't their list manger already ruled that out?

From memory he said that they weren't considering him 'at that time'.

There's not a lot of key forwards available so it would be strange if they didn't consider him.

Hopefully for us they give him 2-3 years at a decent clip.

 

[DougalHoward]

Dunno if Membrey would want to move there with his wife and 2 kids.

 

[ScrappyDo]

Maybe Tigers keep F2;


SAINTS give: 8, F1, 27
SAINTS get: 3, 18, 51, Eagles F3

RICHMOND give: Baker, 18, 51
RICHMOND get: Saints F1, 27

EAGLES give: 3, F3
EAGLES get: 8, Baker

Points wise it works out (rates Baker at pick 10 which is overs but probably satisfies the Tigs... maybe they get Eagles F3 too)

That would be epic but still too heavily weighted to us. 3 & 18 would get it done for us. Although the extra 3rds would be very handy.

 

[HeavenlySources]

So we would be left with:

3,7,18,47,51,85

F2,F3,F3

Stoked with this hand, WC still can have 2 Frdp after trading out Barrass.

Although its hard to see why WC and Richmond wouldn’t just do

3 for 6 and Baker unless Richmond get a good deal from us facilitating

 

[Winmar2Lockett]

That would be epic but still too heavily weighted to us. 3 & 18 would get it done for us. Although the extra 3rds would be very handy.

Not sure either the Tigs or Weagles would even use those late picks.

C'mon you bastards, throw them our way!

 

[Winmar2Lockett]

Stoked with this hand, WC still can have 2 Frdp after trading out Barrass.

Although its hard to see why WC and Richmond wouldn’t just do

3 for 6 and Baker unless Richmond get a good deal from us facilitating

The Future 1st would be the carrot I suppose

 

[stavro#4]

Maybe Tigers keep F2;


SAINTS give: 8, F1, 27
SAINTS get: 3, 18, 51, Eagles F3

RICHMOND give: Baker, 18, 51
RICHMOND get: Saints F1, 27

EAGLES give: 3, F3
EAGLES get: 8, Baker

Points wise it works out (rates Baker at pick 10 which is overs but probably satisfies the Tigs... maybe they get Eagles F3 too)

Yes. And then it could work.

IMHO.

Tigers might also be reluctant to chuck in pick 51 but as I said it could be a good faith brokerage fee for helping them out.

West Coast could also fling a F3 to the Tigers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That would be epic but still too heavily weighted to us. 3 & 18 would get it done for us. Although the extra 3rds would be very handy.

So does this work for everyone?

We clearly give up the most. But also gain the most.

Tigers doom ride us next season for a pick between 4-14.

 

[Saintos The ITK]

When we’re able to trade two years into the future the new standard will be:
1F1 - future first for next year
2F1 - future first for second year
1F2, 2F2 and so forth.

Or we could go F1(1), F1(2) etc

We need to start thinking about this now people.

 

[bird_man]

I’m going to give this potential 3 way trade a crack.

SAINTS give: 8, F1, 27
SAINTS get: 3, 18, Tigers F2, 51

RICHMOND give: Baker, 18, F2,51
RICHMOND get: Saints F1, 27

EAGLES give: 3,
EAGLES get: 8, Baker

(This was a lot harder then I thought)

I don't think Richmond get much out of that deal

They get a future first but have to give up 18 for it

 

[John2010362340]

So does this work for everyone?

We clearly give up the most. But also gain the most.

Tigers doom ride us next season for a pick between 4-14.

Our priority should be getting our hands on 3. Next year clubs will most likely be able to trade 2 years in advance. So if someone we like is left in the draft we will have capital to trade in on the night of the 2025 draft. Get 3 keep 7 that has to be the play.

 

[saintbill]

If Bailey Smith gets walked we should downgrade pick 8 to 11 or 13 and take him with that. Ready made and proven.

Don't want. Just too into himself for my liking.

Saw an insta post of himself getting out of the pool, with a full blown boner in speedos in an attempt to show off his package. Was nothing short of pornographic.

Good to have confidence, but I think we would be dealing with historic levels of FIGJAM.

 

[stavro#4]

I don't think Richmond get much out of that deal

They get a future first but have to give up 18 for it

They get our future first which could be top 5 or top 10 next year.

 

[saint66au]

The irony of a 535 page thread for a Trade period where we quite conceivably make one (Macrae) or even no trades in would be glorious lol

 

[bird_man]

They get our future first which could be top 5 or top 10 next year.

I reckon if you flag that to Richmond flags they would shoot it down in a second.

Yes, they get a future first but it won't be top 5. Could well be top 10 but that will go well down the order in next years draft.

It's not a good deal for them.

 

[Feerits Elf]

Saw an insta post of himself getting out of the pool, with a full blown boner in speedos in an attempt to show off his package. Was nothing short of pornographic.

The fact a fully turgid Bailey Smith can't escape a pair of Speedos is illuminating.

 

[ScrappyDo]

So does this work for everyone?

We clearly give up the most. But also gain the most.

Tigers doom ride us next season for a pick between 4-14.

SAINTS give: 8, F1, 27
SAINTS get: 3, 18,

RICHMOND give: Baker, 18
RICHMOND get: Saints F1, 27

EAGLES give: 3
EAGLES get: 8, Baker

This works.
WCE get Bo Allen at 8.
Not sure either WC or Tigs are that happy though.

 

[stavro#4]

I reckon if you flag that to Richmond flags they would shoot it down in a second.

Yes, they get a future first but it won't be top 5. Could well be top 10 but that will go well down the order in next years draft.

It's not a good deal for them.

It’s based on Richmond saying they have interest in shuffling some capital into next year.

 

[St Neil]

The Future 1st would be the carrot I suppose

Correct.

Tigers spreading the rick and building a strong hand for next year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[stavro#4]

Liam Pickering on Weitering St Kilda interest -

It was just a phone call and the figures reported were wrong.

 

[bird_man]

Maybe Tigers keep F2;


SAINTS give: 8, F1, 27
SAINTS get: 3, 18, 51, Eagles F3

RICHMOND give: Baker, 18, 51
RICHMOND get: Saints F1, 27

EAGLES give: 3, F3
EAGLES get: 8, Baker

Points wise it works out (rates Baker at pick 10 which is overs but probably satisfies the Tigs... maybe they get Eagles F3 too)

This one is a little closer with us giving up 27 and not getting a second back

 

[Remboy]

So does this work for everyone?

We clearly give up the most. But also gain the most.

Tigers doom ride us next season for a pick between 4-14.

Let us know when you’ve lodged the paperwork Stav.

 

[bird_man]

It’s based on Richmond saying they have interest in shuffling some capital into next year.

Yeah, they still need to get a decent trade.

It values Baker at very little, I think the trade W2L put up is closer to the mark.

 

[St Neil]

I don't think Richmond get much out of that deal

They get a future first but have to give up 18 for it

They could use 20 or even 24 and then smooth it over with a variation of other picks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[saintbill]

The irony of a 535 page thread for a Trade period where we quite conceivably make one (Macrae) or even no trades in would be glorious lol

Nobody does it better!

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Don't want. Just too into himself for my liking.

Saw an insta post of himself getting out of the pool, with a full blown boner in speedos in an attempt to show off his package. Was nothing short of pornographic.

Good to have confidence, but I think we would be dealing with historic levels of FIGJAM.

He must have seen a reflection of himself before he got out.