Game Day 2024 Non-Swans Game Day

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The ladder will look a bit different if the Dees and Cats win, going third and fourth, pushing Port down to 5th and Blues to 6th. Pies v Dogs and Suns v Bombers also crucial. So nice to be sitting clear!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is it just me or is there no difference in the HTB calls tonight?

Inconsistent, no rhyme or reason. Nothing different
The timing was never the problem which is what they've changed. It was blatant dropping of the ball with prior that they have and are still butchering.

I found tonight's calls more confusing than ever.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This season keeps delivering... even when we have a bye other contenders fail to close the gap...

Based on past results. I'm expecting Suns to get the W against Essendon to keep the gap between us and the rest of the pack.

Expecting the Pies to get up they always seem to find a way or at the worst get a draw! they havent lost a game since round 3 or something.
 
I finally meandered over to the Sack Hinkley thread today. I'm not usually one to venture into other teams' boards but I wanted to see what all the fuss was about.

I think the comment that stood out to me was something along the lines of, "Tired of seeing the same season over and over again."

I felt that pretty succinctly nails Hinkley's tenure as coach. They're currently in contention for a top four spot, but it's not like this is anything new. They've finished top 4 three times before, all in the last five years. All failed to result in grand final appearances. And in each of those years their primary issues were performing in big games against tough opponents. That doesn't seem to be rectified in any way this year.

It must be maddening to feel like seasons are going by, but nothing's really changing. Horse has his flaws, but one thing that can't be denied is that he's made the ride - good or bad times - wildly interesting over the journey.

But I also think Port fans are in a bit of denial about the team they have. It's good, but it's not THAT good. Their strategy of topping up and plugging holes with average players - particularly talls - has put a lot of pressure on their ground level players, most of whom are nothing special. Even their best players aren't without fault. I think Zak Butters is a gun, but the way he plays - the trying to get 1-2s constantly, the zigging and zagging himself out of, and back into, trouble, the full throttle 'any disposal is a good disposal' approach he takes - is always going to be flakey under extreme pressure and intensity. I think it's emblematic of Port's overriding issue in terms of delivering under pressure, against the best.
 
I finally meandered over to the Sack Hinkley thread today. I'm not usually one to venture into other teams' boards but I wanted to see what all the fuss was about.

I think the comment that stood out to me was something along the lines of, "Tired of seeing the same season over and over again."

I felt that pretty succinctly nails Hinkley's tenure as coach. They're currently in contention for a top four spot, but it's not like this is anything new. They've finished top 4 three times before, all in the last five years. All failed to result in grand final appearances. And in each of those years their primary issues were performing in big games against tough opponents. That doesn't seem to be rectified in any way this year.

It must be maddening to feel like seasons are going by, but nothing's really changing. Horse has his flaws, but one thing that can't be denied is that he's made the ride - good or bad times - wildly interesting over the journey.

But I also think Port fans are in a bit of denial about the team they have. It's good, but it's not THAT good. Their strategy of topping up and plugging holes with average players - particularly talls - has put a lot of pressure on their ground level players, most of whom are nothing special. Even their best players aren't without fault. I think Zak Butters is a gun, but the way he plays - the trying to get 1-2s constantly, the zigging and zagging himself out of, and back into, trouble, the full throttle 'any disposal is a good disposal' approach he takes - is always going to be flakey under extreme pressure and intensity. I think it's emblematic of Port's overriding issue in terms of delivering under pressure, against the best.
I found Grundy's (implied) contrast between Port's approach to him and Sydney's very interesting. I got the impression that Hinkley ran the show and that his world view was very narrow while Sydney's was very much a team approach with a very broad view.
I wonder if this has implications for Port's performance.
 
I finally meandered over to the Sack Hinkley thread today. I'm not usually one to venture into other teams' boards but I wanted to see what all the fuss was about.

I think the comment that stood out to me was something along the lines of, "Tired of seeing the same season over and over again."

I felt that pretty succinctly nails Hinkley's tenure as coach. They're currently in contention for a top four spot, but it's not like this is anything new. They've finished top 4 three times before, all in the last five years. All failed to result in grand final appearances. And in each of those years their primary issues were performing in big games against tough opponents. That doesn't seem to be rectified in any way this year.

It must be maddening to feel like seasons are going by, but nothing's really changing. Horse has his flaws, but one thing that can't be denied is that he's made the ride - good or bad times - wildly interesting over the journey.

But I also think Port fans are in a bit of denial about the team they have. It's good, but it's not THAT good. Their strategy of topping up and plugging holes with average players - particularly talls - has put a lot of pressure on their ground level players, most of whom are nothing special. Even their best players aren't without fault. I think Zak Butters is a gun, but the way he plays - the trying to get 1-2s constantly, the zigging and zagging himself out of, and back into, trouble, the full throttle 'any disposal is a good disposal' approach he takes - is always going to be flakey under extreme pressure and intensity. I think it's emblematic of Port's overriding issue in terms of delivering under pressure, against the best.
Nuanced analysis such as this is the antithesis of Sack Hinkley!

If you want to wade into Sack Hinkley territory, I’m afraid you may need to work on your frothing hysteria….
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top