Search results for query: *

The players looked rusty and so did the umps. Don't panic until Rnd 1.

The umps are as rusty as the players. They gave out some really poor decisions (I am not talking about the Lions & Dons game either). I am not concerned though until we reach Rnd 1 of the real stuff.

I must admit that I read that as well and had a good chuckle. Apparantly though his business is doing very well. He is actually quite "fit" these days but his body just falls apart. Being physically fit and being injured is not the same thing, just ask some of the winter Olympians.

Well, if Essendon don't win this year, then I will be happily cheering for the Saints especially if it means you will be upset.

Fev was in the HS this morning complaining he cannot get his set shots below 30 sec. Apparantly Denis Pagan asked him if he was boiling some tea while having a shot. Quite amusing.

Don't you now feel like an idiot...

How droll...

How did you work this out? If it is on GF's then Dons & Eagles would be equal.

Salmon & Van Der haar

Surprisingly no Bombers on here yet. Hennemen by a mile. (Bolton would be a target and Murfs was also).

I would have to agree with you MarkT. Collingwoods list is not as bad as people make it out to be. Sure there are some serious flaws but that is the case with most teams outside the top 6. I honestly think that having a fit and ready Rocca will also make a huge difference to the forward line...

Gaol not jail.

I agree with all that you write there TheWhiteRhino however can I also point out three over-riding factors. 1. The claimant would have no proof that she was date-r*ped unless a tox test was completed (which I deduce has not been done), which would show traces of whatever drug was used. 2...

Actually Dave it is hard to split them. Davey has appeared to be more damaging so far, especially around goal so he probably edges out Lovett. The positive for Andrew is that he is better up the field than Davey. At the end of the day, as others have already stated, can we have both of...

So winning is underacheiving now? Port fans: do you believe your club underacheived with your three year dominance?

Good effort there. Almost made me laugh. If you are looking for laughter keep working on these as attempts. If you are looking for general trolling then pm Macpie for inspiration. He is also the man for Absessive Compulsive Essendon Syndrome.

We had "no one" in 93, we had "no one" in 99 except a few "aging stars". Ask St Kilda how successful they have been with a team of stars.

We may be deluded but I would hardly call us unsuccessful. If you do then you are the deluded one.

I predicted the Tiges would fall away at seasons end, again, and miss the 8. I predict the same in 06. For my Tiges friends I hope differently but I suspect not.

and yet we have played in 7 GF's since you last did and won 4 of them...

and yet we beat yours...

A hawks supporter brandishing a wooden spoon...hmmmm...I would like to see that.

I agree Scooter. I sort of understand why the club felt they should grab him but pick 39 seems too good. I would have been surprised if another club decided to pick him up ahead of us.

Galah would be more appropriate for you.

Do you understand the term yourself? It was fun and the stuff on here was said in jest. I do notice of course that it is mostly not Hawks (except you) who are carrying on but other supporters. Are you all so used to trolling that you no longer understand friendly banter?

was it correct? if it wasn't then the AFL cannot claim copyright. If it was correct then the AFL has sole rights to it until such time as it is released to the public.

Ted for a first round pick. 5 yrs of nothing and was selected 2nd round originally.

Troll

EssendonFC.com.au

Funniest thing I have ever read.