Search results for query: *

Don't run your mouth son. I may be wrong, but from memory, you're the hot shot glamour poster offering to explain things for me, to which offer I wholeheartedly accepted. Funny how you didn't reply after that, hey big boy? Appears to me, only one of us was scared of failure, and it wasn't the...

Hardly. I kind of get that it's the entire point of talking to thick campaigners, which 99.9% of this forum comprises, but chosing to not waste my life butting heads with 2 short planks is hardly breaking anything. Better things to do than repeat myself 15 times to educate dunces.

How's that? A couple of stars to add to the tone? I'll leave the average gags to you, and seeing how that is all you are as a moderator and poster, you can leave the serious posts to the big boy posters. Mod least capable of having a solid opinion and or discussion. Cheers mate.

Darling is handy, and Hill's performances haven't matched his hype so far (he's about to go boom but, I'm expecting Dennis to bust out a "Hill, streaming down the wing, sets sail for home" on GF day if we make it :D)... but seriously Hase, you are dead to me.

Bullshit. If you treat every unsuccessful attempt at something as failure, you will never ever be a success, you will never ever succeed. The difference between winners and losers is winners take the positives from things that don't go there way, they consolidate their knowledge of what it...

Tell me you don't get payed to write for a living?

I would absolutely love it if you did.

How realistic the possibilities of things going wrong for us are, is irrelevant, the principal of that statement still stands. Either a loss regardless of the circumstances means the season is a failure, or it doesn't. That then follows through to the next week, leaving the final argument that...

I'll say it again, accomplishing your goals and setting new goals doesn't detract from the fact that you succeeded in completing what you originally set out to achieve. Top 4 and an away win in the QF would have been considered a pass. Succeeding at one task and failing at the next doesn't...

Accuses someone of petulant insults, follows up with petulant insults. Lawl. I accept different opinions. If I don't agree with them though, I'll express why, and well. Guess it's easy being a sniper and not having to back it up though hey?

Sweet, haven't got 14 ****ing likes/quotes in my alerts, after I smacked all the jabronies down with my superior posting skills. I guess it's offical, I'm right again. Riteo, you were a better know nothing troll when you had a shit avatar. Not sure If changing it is a good thing or bad thing.

I'll take that as a nod. Thanks riteo.

There's a distinct ****ing different between succeeding in achieving your goals, and winning ****ing flags. Using your argument, no team in the competition can be considered as having a successful season, other than the ****ing premiers. No doubt it's a disappointment, and a missed opportunity...

You can't just look at it from a singular match perspective. If we go from 18 to 2nd, and lost a prelim, by the principal of your argument, we are unsuccessful. That is just blatant bullshit. People need to learn to disassociate valid expectations and successfully achieving goals from...

So, it's a bit insane to believe our improvement is exponential, but when we jump from ****ing 8th place, to 3rd, and then knock of the 2nd best team in the competition, it's somehow not exponential growth? By using your flawed logic, if we finish top 2, and don't win 15 premierships, the season...

So what, you're saying that finishing 3rd, knocking off the 2nd places team in a qualifying final, is a pass, or a fail? By the very ****ing nature of goal setting, if you succeed in accomplishing your original ****ing goals, you can consider it a success. You can't determine a set of goals...

You would assume 1st/GF would be the benchmark next season anyway, after finishing 3rd and a QF win.

We've gone from 8th to 3rd, and qualified for a prelim. The season is a success regardless of what happens in the next few weeks.

So losing to the team that finishes 2nd, and then beating 6th/7th and losing in the prelim, is better than beating the team that finished 2nd, and losing the prelim? o_O

You expressed nothing, you were pissed out of your tree and you thought you'd be a hero and take a few pot shots. I struggle to see any argument to counter mine, other than assuming his motives, and you sure as **** haven't validated that with supporting arguments. I know more about football...

Delist Silvagni and McPharlin/Dawson goes down, and we're stuck with Smith, who's played what, 2-3-4? games? Like I said, plan D.

Have you got a problem campaigner? Feel free to step up and post a reasoned opinion, mouth. You've obviously had a belly full of piss, go sober up and come back in the morning.

Please, tell me how Silvagni will dominate while playing for Melbourne. He gets schooled playing for us, and we're the best defensive side in the competition. Like I said, they've got older bodies to hold the fort until they develop ie Davis and Mohr. Forgot Plowman, heh. No doubt KPP...

Would he be? He would be 4th in line for a game at GWS behind Jaksch, Davis, Gilham, Mohr, Bruce, Corr, Sellar. They've just delisted Cornes, O'Hailpin. Tell me why they would want a list clogger, when they've got stud 1st round picks which have served 1/2 year apprenticeships, and seasoned...

That point would still be valid with a 2 or 3 year contract, except Silvagni has added job security (which you all know he'd never refuse), and we have slightly better negotiating power due to no threat of the PSD ;). If we saw him as someone that showed much value to us, or anyone else, he'd be...

Perhaps I don't have a clue, but I'll hedge my bets and back myself in, what do you reckon? If he was anything more than a plan D, he'd get longer than 1 year now, wouldn't he?

I think the re signing of Silvagni is less to do with seeing him as an important to our lineup than it is to do with pretty much no depth, and getting a contract by default.

Nothing better when someone is bullshitting you, you know it, they know you know it, and they keep going with an absolute straight face, and even start to get creative with the elaboration... It's ****ing wonderful to see it happen online too. You are truelly a man ahead of your time Memories.

Didn't see the AFL graphic during the week with winning percentages of 1v4 2v3 etc? Needless to say, everything goes out the window when the ball is bounced.

Yes. Port had a chance v Collingwood. Carlton had a chance v Richmond. They have no chance vs Sydney. They will dismember your players.