Search results for query: *

We're teetering on the brink of burning two of the biggest names in our club's history, the two names with the most combined games in their father/son line at the club.

How many single people do we need to burn to serve the wishes of a handful of muppets on the board and their masters at AFL House?

Eerily prescient words from the Fish (spoken in 2007):

Wish a few more people would listen to Kevin Sheedy's thoughts on what a football club is. His words were something along the lines of "a football club is its people. That's the most important thing".

I suppose one way to prove the club is bigger than its people is to shaft each and every one of them systematically.

But if we sack Hird it'll go away and it'll be sunshine and lollipops with the media. Right?

Source?

If you're going to spout shite, do it elsewhere.

*12

Just teasing, had a good chuckle at the Titus article last week and wanted an excuse to post it.

He'll play Rd 1. And Rd 2. And Rd 3. And so on. O'Keefe and Caddy are two examples off the top of my head, but playing him in the VFL is ridiculous from every angle.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/titus-oreily-collingwood-ignoring-the-peoples-draft-and-trade-ideas/story-fni0ffsx-1227075105780?nk=16585f0af015bc249424a72af0c685aa

Again, it's not our problem. The club is more than happy to keep a required, contracted player.

I dunno, I'm not at all convinced by the idea of "spiking" shots. If Dank wanted to use Tb4, he could have just used it as "thymosin" and no one would have said boo. There would have been no need to say there's a good and bad thymosin either.

And when they throw in the towel for something far more important than a few games of footy?

I think that's the wrong question. We obviously don't know, but I believe the club does. Whether Tb4 could have been used is a question, but I don't believe there is any grey area in the answer to this one. For us uninformed outsiders, the "could haves" are plausible theories, but one way or...

If they take deals, they either believe they're guilty in which case they're liars (don't think this one can be disputed) or they believe they're innocent in which case I believe they are cowards. You don't plead guilty to something you didn't do when the stakes are this high. The parking fine...

Sorry, phrased that poorly. Of course the players should know before the public, but my issue is that it seems likely that they've known for a week and we're left standing here holding our dicks.

At the end of the day, if they take deals, they're either cowards or liars. Refusing to stand up for themselves, or spending two years extorting thousands of dollars each out of thousands of members. The Nuremberg defence doesn't cut it for me, if it came out of their mouths, they said it...

It's ridiculous. There's no point debating with people who refuse to see. The ignore list grows day after day.

Maybe the players do and, as usual, we're the last to find out.

It's not an attempt to blame Bomber for anything, I couldn't really care less what happens with Kav. I haven't seen anything worth fapping over with him, and neither have two coaches by the looks of things. I just thought it was an interesting name to drop, and probably suggestive of where the...

You reckon they're not capable of working out what saying "we believe we did nothing wrong" means?

I dunno, I wouldn't have thought Jarryd Lyons would be citing lack of opportunities under Sanderson as a reason to leave, for example.

Ah, the Nuremberg defence. I'm not putting a cent into the club to support cowards who were "only following orders".

They've been absolutely complicit. "We believe we've done nothing wrong" x1000000

Taking deals = pleading guilty = confessing to drug cheating

Wouldn't it make sense to talk about the coach for the upcoming season, given he's the one who will be giving, or otherwise, opportunities?

I don't care. They've sold the story that they will beat the charges for 2 years in order to get us to keep tipping in money, money that pays for wages far beyond those of the majority of members. If they deal, they're liars or they're cowards. Either way, not worthy of support, financial or...