I agree and it doesn't make sense for it to be Schoenmakers.One of the talls (Schoe or Gunner) must be sub. If so run not so problematic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I agree and it doesn't make sense for it to be Schoenmakers.One of the talls (Schoe or Gunner) must be sub. If so run not so problematic
And that's the point. Gunners is not what you'd call a traditional tall. He adds speed and good goal sense as well as aerial ability. Plus he regularly moves back into the defensive structure. Schoey is mobile, has a big body, compete well in the air, brings the ball to ground and is a great kick. Roughy can play midfield as well as a damaging forward. Ditto Cyril, Poppy and Bruest. Doc, Hill, Smith, Birch, Burger, Mitch, Hodgey can all kick goals and play back or midfield.Do you really think we'll just be bombing it forward though? Schoey is a mobile forward there's nothing to worry about there. All of our talls can hunt the ball and have good disposal.
Suckers could be an impact player I spose but could be important early on. Still say Schoey or Gunners. Re potential for injury Schoey could play in lots of places. Only say Gunner because he hasn't played for a few weeksThe best side they could have selected tbh.
Shoey is in form and Hartung has been off.
Suckers to be the sub.
I hope we haven't unbalanced the side with our team selection
NIc Nat is under a cloud.. what sort of injury?Hoping their is a late change with Hale going out and Hartung coming in.
With Nic Nat under a cloud I think McEvoy and Rough share the duties with Shoey pitching in as needed.
As other posters said Talls encourage Geelong streaking Hawthorn 101.
Bombing high into the 50 worked so well in the QF too....not!
Really wish Langford played to test their rebounders the other way!
Running forward and drilling them from outside 50 also
Yep. Will get a bit annoyed if it's Duryea. Back 6 have found their mojo - don't f with itBilly will go better when the sub vest
The choice of sub will balance the side
Unlikely I'd suggestI wonder if there is any chance of Hill being sub.
Looking at him on the weekend, it looks like it's his groin/op issue has flared up.NIc Nat is under a cloud.. what sort of injury?
I'll vomit if so...Will Doc be sub?
Hoping their is a late change with Hale going out and Hartung coming in.
With Nic Nat under a cloud I think McEvoy and Rough share the duties with Shoey pitching in as needed.
As other posters said Talls encourage Geelong streaking Hawthorn 101.
Bombing high into the 50 worked so well in the QF too....not!
Really wish Langford played to test their rebounders the other way!
Has to be Gunner!I agree and it doesn't make sense for it to be Schoenmakers.
Will Doc be sub?