Position 2017 Rookies

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Doesn't that apply to everyone... i feel like florent has more competition than simpkin or bowes do
My gut says in order Simpkin > Bowes > Florent

Much harder to sustain games in top contenders .....North are building, i know positions named are misleading, but Simpkin named on a wing?

My mind keeps reflecting on Paul Roo's gushing over Simpkin ......he rarely does that
 
Most rooks are a lottery at the moment.

I didn't take Butler because I thought his JS was shaky at best but after last night he'll probably be safe for a few weeks.
I still do, but i agree, he'll at least another couple of games on the back of last night ....i also didn't have Butler, still not regretting the decision ......believe me?
 
5ywbmV.gif

Expect friendly reminder in 2 weeks when mountford makes way for cunnington and balic is named.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My gut says in order Simpkin > Bowes > Florent

Much harder to sustain games in top contenders .....North are building, i know positions named are misleading, but Simpkin named on a wing?

My mind keeps reflecting on Paul Roo's gushing over Simpkin ......he rarely does that

where does Foote fit in the rankings
 
What does everyone think of Barrett's JS & scoring potential? It seems most have him, but am wondering if it's worth me using my $40k in the bank to upgrade him to Florent/Simpkin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top