Post Danger
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
2018 Rate My Team (Post JLT)
- Thread starter WaynesWorld19
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Kruezer could be an option but I just don't think his body will last the year. I reckon Ryder will be the top ruckman this year, so worth copping the zero at the byes for him imo.
Here2tellyouwhy
SA GREAT
Not bad campaigner
Usually an hour before the bounce
If that's the case i'll have to change my plan a little
No Piggerd?
stevebbb
Brownlow Medallist
- May 21, 2013
- 23,658
- 60,843
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Fluminense; Blue Jays
Has averaged 91.2 and 89 in the past playing predominately in the forward 50
More midfield minutes and hopefully over the injuries that hampered him over the last couple years, should see him go 90 at least
Not sure about danger, i see him dropping about 100k and then a good switch at about round 7
More tweaks... I know Cox is a huge risk as R2 (and probably won't stay that way).... Any feedback?
Cox definitely a risk with Grundy not going to be out of that team any time soon. Caddy is always a tease, I struggle to believe any run of form is real from him.
I've had a bash - just 846 permutations to work through before opening bounce. Would likely straight swap Danger to Titch if any further certainty comes out about Paddy's fitness. Other considerations are I keep flipping Lloyd to Savage to Sicily to Shaw and back again. And Garlett might need to be someone else if he's not in the team.
I've had a bash - just 846 permutations to work through before opening bounce. Would likely straight swap Danger to Titch if any further certainty comes out about Paddy's fitness. Other considerations are I keep flipping Lloyd to Savage to Sicily to Shaw and back again. And Garlett might need to be someone else if he's not in the team.
BegaStringer25
Draftee
- Mar 4, 2018
- 16
- 3
- AFL Club
- Essendon
thoughts fellas
Witherden to Bonner Cox to Stef
I like that team.
I think you've brought in a few players that are probably full priced but I can see them being top 10 in their position. I generally look for a bit of value in my starting team.
Not convinced on Nank though.
pincrusher
Moderator
- Moderator
- #4,841
What % ownership is considered a POD? Under 10? Under 5?
Good except F5. Gov/Hibberd>Coffield or Cole, North rookie>Petracca or whoever you like
vanders
Brownlow Medallist
Top one, change Lyons to Cogs though imo
pincrusher
Moderator
treading a risky one here.
Have loaded the backline with 5 potential 90+ scorers, plus Murray who could do pretty well.
It means i have 4 premium mids, a smokey in Graham, plus 3 rookies starting.
The forward line is the biggest gamble. Have not spent big, but i have no rookies starting.
Cash is there to upgrade Higgins to Stephenson if he's not named Rd.1
Have loaded the backline with 5 potential 90+ scorers, plus Murray who could do pretty well.
It means i have 4 premium mids, a smokey in Graham, plus 3 rookies starting.
The forward line is the biggest gamble. Have not spent big, but i have no rookies starting.
Cash is there to upgrade Higgins to Stephenson if he's not named Rd.1
- Jun 17, 2007
- 3,809
- 4,973
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Inverleigh Hawks
What are people's strateges for the Rd1 VC loophole?
Are you picking a $102K player (most likely R3) for the yearly set and forget loophole?
Or picking a rookie that won't debut in Rd1 but should get some games early?
Or just picking 30 players who are named Rd1 and forgoing the VC loophole for this round, thinking that you will have at least 1 out for Rd2?
Or waiting till after the early games to finalise the squad and taking it from there?
Or any other strategies?
I see most people here have gone the no Danger option at this stage and I will admit it makes the rest of the team look stronger but it more than likely will cost you 2 trades to get him in later so am thinking it might be an idea to start with him even if he misses and use him as the VC loophole.
Thoughts?
Are you picking a $102K player (most likely R3) for the yearly set and forget loophole?
Or picking a rookie that won't debut in Rd1 but should get some games early?
Or just picking 30 players who are named Rd1 and forgoing the VC loophole for this round, thinking that you will have at least 1 out for Rd2?
Or waiting till after the early games to finalise the squad and taking it from there?
Or any other strategies?
I see most people here have gone the no Danger option at this stage and I will admit it makes the rest of the team look stronger but it more than likely will cost you 2 trades to get him in later so am thinking it might be an idea to start with him even if he misses and use him as the VC loophole.
Thoughts?
Under 10 is a POD in my book. Under 5 is a super POD
- Status
