List Mgmt. 2018 St Kilda Trade Thread Part 4

Remove this Banner Ad

:moustache:

To be fair mate. It’s a lot of other posters that need to understand that you come on here in good faith sharing info that people like st_trav_ofWA have done unspeakable things to hear. You don’t deserve the criticism for not being in the room and passing on info.
It's what keeps the forum interesting.

I don't mind when people like you or MG or Trav come on and state things up front.
There are always some things that change.
It's the others who come on with obtuse hints, and cryptic posts that is annoying.
What do you guys get from imparting the whispers apart from ridicule? That's why I trust you, Trav and MG when you state what you have heard, as your heart is in it for the Saints fans.

Others do it for their ego and cachet.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dunstan and 4 to Adelaide
8 & 13 to Saints.

Put the foot down and tell them that's the only way Pick 4 is ending up at the Crows.

If Port wants it, it'll be for their next two first round picks.

How much do they want an SA star??

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Putting the foot down would be not throwing in anything with pick 4. Trading 4 for 8 & 13 isn't a good idea for starters... adding something to it is just dumb.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Nah as other posters said, He's being traded to play WAFL and 39 sounds pretty decent in that context. He's definitely third ruck at the Eagles but is a good trade-in for them - he's very much AFL standard on his good days and Nic Nat has missed 1/3 of the last two seasons so they need cover.
Other posters are full of shit, he won't be their third ruck, he'll definitely be playing AFL and will be their #1 ruckmen as Nic Nat will be out nearly all year, Vardy is very average.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Are people seriously that upset about pick 39 for hickey?!

He’s 28 and a very very average ruckman and afl player in general. Take it and run. Use it for Hannebery and we walk away laughing.

if we can swap pick 39 out right for hanners then we are doing alright.

sadly i dont think that will be it. it will be next years 2nd for hanners. which makes the tom hickey trade in and trade absolute junk.
 
the hickey trade is yuuucccckkkkkk

now we can look back on that ******* atrocious tom lee and tom hickey trades. deplorable.

I still maintain that the Tom Lee deal was perfectly acceptable at the time.

Tom Lee was talked up as going in the mid-late first round of that draft. Kevin Sheahan (AFL Talent manager) said he would have taken him as high as pick 11 at Carlton.

Lee played solid football under Scotty Watters but was clearly on the wrong side for Richo's style and it didnt work out. If we had drafted better with those other picks, and developed Lee correctly, we would be looking great ATM.

The Hickey deal is gross though. Nobody saw Grundy sliding that far (and we would probably have ruined his development) but he was there if we needed a younger ruck option.
 
:moustache:

To be fair mate. It’s a lot of other posters that need to understand that you come on here in good faith sharing info that people like st_trav_ofWA have done unspeakable things to hear. You don’t deserve the criticism for not being in the room and passing on info.
Lmao
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2018 St Kilda Trade Thread Part 4

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top