List Mgmt. 2018 St Kilda Trade Thread Part 4

Remove this Banner Ad

So his value has increased after 14 games, since you picked him in the second round at number 25?

Not being a dick, just haven't watched a lot of him.
Yes it has because

a) he is contracted
b) he is a required player
c) did I mention contracted.

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Because some boffin thinks you can add up points for multiple late picks and equate it to an earlier pick.
Lets work out how many 4th rounders it will take to draft the next Scott Pendlebury.
So on draft night...

Pick 39. St Kilda. Nah just kidding. Go to the back of the line and jump in between 59 and 61.

Is that how it works?
 
Why would we give up anything for Dean Kent when his club doesn’t want him and he can and will walk to us for nothing.
As for putting Long on the trade table, if it’s not a lie it’s a big mistake.

We do wan't him. Just not prepared to take the risk with a 3 year deal given his injury history. We wanted to give him 1 year.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

So we don't have pick 39 but somehow by magic it is pick 60.

Lol, the spin by people on here is hilarious.
You're meant to be good with numbers dude…

If we trade out Gresham and our pick 4 for pick 1, would you be happy that we got pick 1 for Gresham?

I reckon spin would be ignoring the net result and just focusing on a certain element to make yourself feel like a winner.
 
The response to the trade pretty much mirrors the chasm between fans and haters of Hickey… to be expected I guess.

If you don't rate him, it's a great deal.

If you do rate him, then it's a very ordinary return.
I thought out of Longer and Hickey, Hickey was the better ruck.
Pierce and Marshall still developing.

And I reckon 39 is an absolute steal.

4th rounders are totally irrelevant.



On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Dont like the comments about looking to use the draft to pick up a ruckman. We currently have 3 and 2 of them are pure rucks in Longer and Pierce with another that has shown that he can pinch hit in Marshall.

Let's see how these guys go next year as established ruckman are fairly easy to acquire every season that can be serviceable.

Also next year isn't there a mid year draft we can use to pick up and vfl/sanfl ruck to fill in if the above 2 or 3 are injured?.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You're meant to be good with numbers dude…

If we trade out Gresham and our pick 4 for pick 1, would you be happy that we got pick 1 for Gresham?

I reckon spin would be ignoring the net result and just focusing on a certain element to make yourself feel like a winner.
What has Gres got to do with it.
You said we got pick 60 because of points or something.

What happens on draft night if we keep the pick?

We can't use it until 60 because of points?

Did we get pick 39 or not? Really it's not alchemy

On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Can the points expert work out the value of Hickey when.......

Pick 13,36 and 55 is traded for Hickey, 25 and 46.

Pity just about all the picks were squandered. ( Jesse Lonergon anyone ).
Melbourne got Dean Kent at pick 48.
46 Ended up going to Sydney for Membrey, but we got him for free anyway.

13, 36 & 55 = 1921
25 & 46 = 1087
Difference of 834 which is approximately pick 22
 
Hickey on Nicnat:
"I don't have to be scared of him anymore, which is good,
I spent the last eight years of my career hating the flight over to Perth so I'm really looking forward to working under him and learning a lot off him."

Bad news Tom. I think you'll be spending a lot more time going up against Nick now you have to train with him every day. Or "under" him, as you say.

I like Tom as a bloke, but that’s such a piss weak mindset as an athlete
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2018 St Kilda Trade Thread Part 4

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top