List Mgmt. 2018 Trade, Free Agency & Draft thread MK II [Polec ✔️ Hall ✔️ Gaff ❓ Newman ❓]

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
What would you prefer?

Kelly, Polec, Gaff.

Or Shiel, Dalhaus, Gaff.

If you redirect the Polec funds to Shiel then suddenly there's no cash left for Kelly. You might have chump change left for Dalhaus though...
tbh i dont want polec so the option that doesnt have him, direct the funds elsewhere

i reckon we would be able to fit all 3 of shiel, kelly and gaff salary wise, its trade currency that would be the issue
 
No point even comtemplating getting both Shiel and Kelly. Never happening. Be realistic. Greed is not a good trait. We’ll have our turn with Kelly next season
it would be something like our first rounder this year and preuss with maybe a pick swap in their favour for Shiel, instead of wasting our first pick resources on polec despite expecting something back in our favour

Gaff FA

next year our first rounder and second rounder plus maybe even a player for Kelly


all 3 Shiel, kelly and gaff in our side by end of next year boom
 

Log in to remove this ad.

it would be something like our first rounder this year and preuss with maybe a pick swap in their favour for Shiel, instead of wasting our first pick resources on polec despite expecting something back in our favour

You left out next year's first rounder too.

Treloar went for two firsts and he was out of contract. You're never getting Shiel for pick 9 and Preuss.

Not to mention we already have an agreement with GWS not to approach Kelly this year, so I doubt we're going to have a crack at Shiel.
 
it would be something like our first rounder this year and preuss with maybe a pick swap in their favour for Shiel, instead of wasting our first pick resources on polec despite expecting something back in our favour

Gaff FA

next year our first rounder and second rounder plus maybe even a player for Kelly


all 3 Shiel, kelly and gaff in our side by end of next year boom

Too much of the same. At least Polec can hit a wing or a HBF... Shiel is too one dimensional for our list.
 
Shiel can play inside or outside mid

Polec only outside mid or hbf

Both can do 2 roles

And I'd much rather pay more for Shiel
Shiel may be better mate but you’ve gotta look at the situation. Shiel is contracted, and worth far more assets in a trade than Polec (who is uncontracted). If a deal were to be struck with the Giants for Shiel, then we would A) hamper our relationship with GWS for next year’s Kelly talks and B) be out of assets for Kelly anyway.

Looking long term, we would much rather have Polec, Gaff and Kelly at the end of 2019 than just Shiel and Gaff.
 
Shiel may be better mate but you’ve gotta look at the situation. Shiel is contracted, and worth far more assets in a trade than Polec (who is uncontracted). If a deal were to be struck with the Giants for Shiel, then we would A) hamper our relationship with GWS for next year’s Kelly talks and B) be out of assets for Kelly anyway.

Looking long term, we would much rather have Polec, Gaff and Kelly at the end of 2019 than just Shiel and Gaff.
My point is it can be done to get Shiel, Kelly and Gaff

I'd pass on Polec who would cost a first pick anyway with something coming back

But may as well use our first pick on shiel instead of Polec plus add Preuss and another player if need be for Shiel
 
My point is it can be done to get Shiel, Kelly and Gaff

I'd pass on Polec who would cost a first pick anyway with something coming back

But may as well use our first pick on shiel instead of Polec plus add Preuss and another player if need be for Shiel
That’s the thing though, it would be near on impossible to get both Shiel and Kelly in consecutive years. We simply don’t have the trading ammo or assets.
 
That’s the thing though, it would be near on impossible to get both Shiel and Kelly in consecutive years. We simply don’t have the trading ammo or assets.
What you are using to get Polec is a fair bit of the way to getting Shiel

Just go for Shiel instead and add players to the first pick
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GWS have told Essendon and Carlton the starting bid is a player for Shiel. And it's not bit parts, it's a serious footballer.

They are going to start jacking up their prices. Our targets are progressing just fine.
 
My mail isn't rock solid but Scott is no certainty to nominate us, and Crocker might get through to the Rookie Draft.

RE: rookie list, we can definitely leave Murphy there as it would be his 2nd season. I think with Zurhaar we would need his permission.

Another edit: if we were to upgrade them, they count as a drafted player i.e. use points for Thomas, upgrade TM and CZ = made the three draft selections required.

extracted this from NMFC site: Zurhaar can now look forward to another two years at Arden Street. Under his new deal, he will remain a rookie next season before being elevated to the Roos' senior list in 2020.

So it's a lock that Cam's remaining on the rookie list.
 
That’s the thing though, it would be near on impossible to get both Shiel and Kelly in consecutive years. We simply don’t have the trading ammo or assets.
Unless we trade for Shiel this year, keep him for a year and then trade him back to GWS for Kelly next year. You know it makes sense.
 
GWS have told Essendon and Carlton the starting bid is a player for Shiel. And it's not bit parts, it's a serious footballer.

They are going to start jacking up their prices. Our targets are progressing just fine.

Is that merett and Cripps.

What’s this dawks talk re gaff
 
What you are using to get Polec is a fair bit of the way to getting Shiel

Just go for Shiel instead and add players to the first pick

In your scenario you would be looking at pick 9 and LDU as a starting point.
 
Something tells me Gaff’s end destination will be a surprise. Hawks looming IMO.
I really want him at North, for what it’s worth, but got a weird feeling it just won’t be.
I know. Imagine spending all this time as the favourite only to have your heart broken at the end as you fund out he's chosen someone you didn't even think was a threat.

Oh wait, I thought this was the thread about The Bachelor.
 
What you are using to get Polec is a fair bit of the way to getting Shiel

Just go for Shiel instead and add players to the first pick
Polec is OOC and Port will accept what we offer. Shiel is contracted, and if our offer to them isn’t sufficient, they’ll move on to talks with other clubs, like *, Carlton, etc.. GWS holds far more power than Port and for that reason it would be wiser to lock in the Polec deal and go hard for JK next year.
 
How about you don't.

giphy.gif
 
I know. Imagine spending all this time as the favourite only to have your heart broken at the end as you fund out he's chosen someone you didn't even think was a threat.

Oh wait, I thought this was the thread about The Bachelor.
I’m a realist. Money isn’t everything, success is. Hawks and Clarkson particularly would be very enticing for a good player. Not sure we have that pull.
 
Polec is OOC and Port will accept what we offer. Shiel is contracted, and if our offer to them isn’t sufficient, they’ll move on to talks with other clubs, like *, Carlton, etc.. GWS holds far more power than Port and for that reason it would be wiser to lock in the Polec deal and go hard for JK next year.
No doubt it's easier to get Polec but we shouldn't be taking the easy option when it would still cost us a lot

Rather go the harder option in Shiel and if we miss out so be it at least we went for the best

We then have more cash for others to reload and still pickup bargain options like Aaron Hall or Jamie Elliot etc and bank the cash for the next year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top