
Pykie
Cancelled





Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 0
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
You doubt that they'd make changes after a win like that, but if Lords is flat, they'll want a 5th bowling option. Bancroft for Labushagne/Marsh, push Khawaja to open.
no changes to the batting line up.
...even if you're one of those people who can't tolerate a single bad performance there is simply no room for Labuschagne. reshuffling the batting order just to get him in would be a stupid move. if we lose an opener then Harris comes in.
given they seem hell bent on rotating the bowlers im guessing Starc comes in for Pattinson....maybe the following test Sids can sit out for Hazelwood.
personally i wouldn't change a thing but provided Cummins and Lyon never leave the side i'm ok with it.
Root came out and publicly complained about the Lords pitch used for the Ireland test so won't be surprised to see something a little less juicy.Karl McDermott is the new pitch curator at Lords, he's produced the Ireland test match pitch and the WC final so far.
Day 1 Pitch vs Ireland:
View attachment 721545
WC Final:
View attachment 721548
I wouldn’t change a thing. England is built for seamers and Siddle extracted the most of the ball I felt. Just hit a beautiful line and moved it off the seam. There’s no way you’d drop him. Pattinson was solid, and Cummins was great. I think it’s the best trio we’ve got. I don’t even know if he is in the squad but Daniel Worrall would be my next choice.With 9 days between tests, there seems no reason to change the bowling attack, but apparently picking Starc to go for 4 an over will improve Australia...
England would love to see Starc and Hazlewood running in at Lords, so I say go for it!
Interested to see what team they put out for the tour match starting tomorrow. You'd think Neser, Hazlewood and Starc will come in.
For the Australians, I suspect the plan was not to play Siddle in the London games. That might not be the case for Lord's now. First innings, Cummins would have been the bowler under pressure but he got bettera s he got more work into him. He possibly just needed the long form game time, and got very good by late in the English first innings.
Bancroft was a line-ball decision, and might be under some pressure already but a win probably saves him for now.
Presumably Anderson is done for a while, and maybe career ended. Sad way to go out if that eventuates. They'll probably bring in Archer, I'm not sure about his test match credentials. Some of the slower ball stuff that is so successful in 50 and 20 over cricket isn't wicket taking in the long form, and whether he can do longer spells and back up again is questionable. the quicker one might be dangerous, if he can get some movement.
Moeen Ali surely gets replaced. But who have they got?
Presumably Anderson is done for a while, and maybe career ended. Sad way to go out if that eventuates. They'll probably bring in Archer, I'm not sure about his test match credentials. Some of the slower ball stuff that is so successful in 50 and 20 over cricket isn't wicket taking in the long form, and whether he can do longer spells and back up again is questionable. the quicker one might be dangerous, if he can get some movement.
Moeen Ali surely gets replaced. But who have they got?
Why on earth would you bring Starc in after that performance?
Felt like the first time in a long time we didn't have a bowler releases the pressure via sending down trash.
Easiest task for the selectors in a while - no change.
Well I never....Root came out and publicly complained