List Mgmt. 2020 Draft Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Lets hope so, my original point was fixing a poor tank isn't as easy as some think

Thankfully, the endurance required to do a 2 or 3KM time trial isn't always reflective of a players on field endurance. Grundy is always at the rear of our time trials yet covers the footy field beautifully.

And I'm also not sure we need every player to be like a Phillips or a Rantall. Swanny was another poor time trial runner but he was arguably the best burst-recover player in the league at his prime.
 
Genuinely possibility GWS come to us with pick 15 (will be 17 or 18 by then) and request our 2021 first rounder or threaten to bid on Reef.

Should be something we explore - imagine coming away with 14,15,16 and Reef...

Could be a stinker of a draft, or set us up for the next decade - literally all comes down to the bid on Reef...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Genuinely possibility GWS come to us with pick 15 (will be 17 or 18 by then) and request our 2021 first rounder or threaten to bid on Reef.

Should be something we explore - imagine coming away with 14,15,16 and Reef...

Could be a stinker of a draft, or set us up for the next decade - literally all comes down to the bid on Reef...

Looks that way
 
Genuinely possibility GWS come to us with pick 15 (will be 17 or 18 by then) and request our 2021 first rounder or threaten to bid on Reef.

Should be something we explore - imagine coming away with 14,15,16 and Reef...

Could be a stinker of a draft, or set us up for the next decade - literally all comes down to the bid on Reef...

Is there such thing as Draft Blackmail? 😂😂😂
 
Is there such thing as Draft Blackmail? 😂😂😂
I’m fairly sure Essendon or GWS will try it. Unfortunately if Essendon do they’ll probably want pick 14 too knowing the Dodo.
 
If Reef escapes an early bid (and we can't snare ourselves a better deal) and is still on the board after Fremantle's current pick 12 then I'd look to see if we can trade our future 1st, 16 for 13, 15 from GWS. If GWS wanted to retain 15 we could have a hand shake agreement in place they won't bid on Reef with that pick.

Some might be disappointed with a result of pick 13 (likely 15 or 16 on the night) for our future 1st but they way I see it if we can guarantee none of our current 1st round picks will be eaten up matching a bid from GWS, with the other sliding back in the process and we can use our late picks to pay for Reef instead then we have gained added value out of the trade for our future 1st and will leave the night with 4 players taken within the first round (if Reef receives a bid within it).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I would try to offer Future First Round Pick for Pick 13 and 26 of GWS, as well as no-bid to Reef McInnes

Could we trade out Future 1st and Next Pick for a Pick This Year IF Reef get an early Bid?
 
Could we trade out Future 1st and Next Pick for a Pick This Year IF Reef get an early Bid?

No point in doing that Dave, given that the goal for any trade involving our future first round pick would have to be getting another early pick in before a bid for Reef comes.
 
I would try to offer Future First Round Pick for Pick 13 and 26 of GWS, as well as no-bid to Reef McInnes

I don't think our future 1st is enough for pick 13 and 26. Would be nice though.
 
Collingwood14, 16, 65, 66, 68, 75, 91, 105, 116, 122


Um wtf? Where did those 100's picks come from? haha
They’re probably factoring in that several of those picks will be eaten by a reef bid.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2020 Draft Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top