Strategy 2021 Draft and Hypothetical pick trade proposals

[Strapping Young Lad]

Lol seriously can we just have a ban on posting things ol clickbait Kornes says…

none of it is interesting and it’s all designed to just stir people up.

Hodgey wants a new rule! Hodgey gets a new rule.

No more clickbait shit from Cornes in here.


Also:

Can we also threadban Rendell quotes. The bloke is senile.

Done

 

[killerspud]

Greater Western Sydney is contemplating making a shock move for star Hawk Chad Wingard in a bid to supercharge its premiership assault.
Wingard’s name emerged as an option after Bobby Hill’s weekend trade request to Essendon, in the knowledge Hawthorn is willing to offload experienced talent to accelerate the club’s rebuild.

It’s understood the Giants would part with Hill, who is contracted until the end of next season, only if they could replace him with another small forward.
There have been preliminary discussions between the clubs, but it’s unclear whether Wingard would be willing to relocate to Sydney to play for a third AFL club after starting his career at Port Adelaide.
His four-year deal after crossing from the Power expires at the end of next season.

Thanks for that

 

[Pessimistic]

In b4 we get crappy picks for these players and to a man you all fall over to justify it, having already said it should be early picks

 

[Judd2Sewell]

In b4 we get crappy picks for these players and to a man you all fall over to justify it, having already said it should be early picks

Let's keep everyone, trade TOB back in, sack Mitchell and re-hire Clarko. Run it back. There's still juice left in the tank.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

I would prefer if we trade Gunston, Breust and/or Mitchell before Wingard.

 

[Hawks851]

Chad isn’t going anywhere remember IYKYK ?

 

[Iceman!]

I would prefer if we trade Gunston, Breust and/or Mitchell before Wingard.

It depends on the return

If it nets us a significantly better return i would prefer to trade Wingard, he is clearly more valuable though.

 

[chopflop]

Chad isn’t going anywhere remember IYKYK ?

Until GWS go "we are willing to offer you 4 years at 750"... He ain't getting those years coming OOC at hawthorn next year @29. The security will appeal. As it will for any of the others mentioned i.e., titch omeara and gunston

 

[flinchfree]

Ceglar is no different to those talls

Not sure you watch footy.
Cegs has played some cracking footy for us, I rate his year last season better than BB's.
There, I said it.

 

[flinchfree]

Not far off. They look like being market value deals as it stands.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Victoria or Chapel street?
Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge difference. I don't want a pick that looks like it was made in North Korea and sat in a cardboard box under a table for 64 weeks waiting to be laid in a stack of other picks all sized 30 and 38.

 

[TylerDurden]

I was thinking 5 + Chad for 2 + 13.

Would be this depending on how much coin we put down.
Of course if he wants to stay, we'd kill it.
My gut tells me he won't want to go, which is also fine.

 

[Wingnut19]

I was thinking 5 + Chad for 2 + 13.

This is the trade I would push for. It’s fair. And bloody exciting

 

[Mercy Seat]

Chad isn’t going anywhere remember IYKYK ?

He posted something similar just before he got traded to us from Port. Clearly this is a very recent development…

 

[TylerDurden]

We want Finn. There's no hiding that fact now.

 

[TylerDurden]

He posted something similar just before he got traded to us from Port. Clearly this is a very recent development…

Correct. Emerged only yesterday. They need a Hill replacement.

 

[Tassie Cryptik]

We want Finn.

Haven't we already got one?

 

[Books]

Until GWS go "we are willing to offer you 4 years at 750"... He ain't getting t
hose years coming OOC at hawthorn next year @29. The security will appeal. As it will for any of the others mentioned i.e., titch omeara and gunston

The AFL might offer Chad an ambassador role if he moves to GWS.

This could get interesting... if Chad is open to the possibility.

 

[Tony3163]

This is the trade I would push for. It’s fair. And bloody exciting

Who is thinking Chad + 5 is better for us than 2 + 13?

 

[Billyc]

Who is thinking Chad + 5 is better for us than 2 + 13?

2 + 13 for Chad + 5 would be overs from a GWS point of view. That puts Chad's value well within top 10. Though if Giants really want Andrew and think he's there at 5, it would make sense for them too. Chad and Greene as a mid/forward combination could be premiership stuff.

The question is how much salary we would pay but if we could land 2+13, that's a ripping deal for Hawthorn.

It makes me a bit nervous though. Chad is a sensitive guy, not business-like like Mitchell or O'Meara. He has said he doesn't want to leave. More than any of our other players, this could get messy.

He posted something similar just before he got traded to us from Port. Clearly this is a very recent development…

I feel sorry for Chad. He seems a really nice and loyal guy but he doesn't live and breathe footy, which has seen him not reach his potential and now a second club is considering moving him out against his clearly stated will. It's a tough business, his personality isn't really suited to it.

 

[mustang]

Well mate if you really want to get serious with this rebuild then you absolutely look at it. Gun intercepting defender and a player who would have the most value on our list. We are well stocked down there so if gws came to us with pick 2 on the table then you’d be crazy not to have a look. We then go back to them and say pick 2 and O’Halloran and I’m probably taking it and running

FA next year would it be better to wait as we could be bottom 5 again and get a after our first round pick compo

 

[Blackhawk42]

Has nobody thought of the obvious here? If Wingard agrees, tell Bobby Hill sorry mate, you're going to Hawthorn. Wingard, 21 and a future second for Hill and 2. Only thing i'd accept personally because as much as being ruthless to improve our list is important, Chad is the least expendable and hardest to replace. I want overs or I don't want it to happen at all.

 

[Billyc]

We want Finn. There's no hiding that fact now.

He is just exactly what we need. 18 year old midfielder with size (and potentially still growing given a spurt this year), speed and agility. Let Mitchell mould him from day 1. Would have been easier to just not win those junk time games but we really need to get our hands on pick 2 I reckon.

 

[hawkguru]

Melbourne- Gunston
Dogs - Breust
Roughandlove you are going to make me guess all night

I could live with both of these but does Melbourne need gunston ?

 

[mustang]

Might come into play. It’d swing it our way if it did happen, $$$$$$ might help.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Are we looking at GC pick 3 also.

 

[Brishawk]

these are elite numbers by chad and what gws would want from him. They lack polish going inside fifty and he is one of the best in the comp.

 

[mustang]

You got this part right.
Media sitting on a story now too.

If we got pick 2 would 5 be in the convo or a future 1st instead.