List Mgmt. 2021 List Management

Remove this Banner Ad

Red thumb brigade out in force again, rather than being able to debate a situation
poster in question has gone from a reasonably good contributor to the superhero we now know as the red fingernail........
 
Gov will be 4 years into his 5 year deal, there's no front ended contract in that anymore.

Fox Footy/The Age had Jack Martin at an average wage of $600k a year with 1 mil in his first year. 3 years into his 5 year deal and I doubt there's much front ending left there too.

Let's say for good measure that we somehow still end up with 800k left. Walsh signed his contract extension back in 2018 after just playing 4 career games, now he's a top 2 favourite for the Brownlow and the best young mid in the league.

I'll let you do the maths but at least half of the remaining cash will be gone on his re-signing.

Im with you Ash. I do think SoS put us in a good position but Martin, Cripps, Weitering, McKay, Williams, Cerra, Saad all are significant. And Walsh to ask for some big bucks. Docherty And Hewett above average. Maybe a few like C Curnow, McGovern , JSoS around the mark or a bit over. Then we have players that will ask for more very soon. Stocker, Philip and Kemp.

Some of those latter names are interchangeable but we have some players who might play well next season asking for a jump.

We are in the window. We haven’t performed but our age demographic and advertised Saad/Williams salaries suggest we are in the window. Will get tough. Other clubs around mid to high table are finding it tough. Doubt we are an exception.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It can actually be challenging to meet your minimum player payments, what is one of the reasons why some get paid so much. A list like ours would have those challenges. Guys like McGovern and Martin actually help with that. Before that we overpaid some players short term and used them as salary dumps. People get annoyed at paying ordinary players a lot of money but forget how the salary cap works. You're better off overpaying players you can offload than to overpay players you are confident are high quality long term stars like Cripps, Curnow, Walsh and McKay because their contracts will always go up and will go out of control if you pay them too much too early.

We haven't been losing players over salaries and we haven't been restricted with who we bring in over salaries so we are going really well in that regard.

I would guess that a lot of our highly paid players are front loaded and helped us meet our MPP then and will be underpaid towards the back end of their contract which helps is bring in new players and sign up our emerging stars.

I would be surprised if we weren't able to bring in good players again next season. I think we will have plenty on the lower part of their pay and be able to clear quite a lot off our list.

From what I can see our players contracts have been managed well.
 
Never that easy - it's base salary + match payments.

Marchbank, Cunningham, McGov, Setters would be on base salary not extract full value of their contracts.

Some players have low base salary but high match payments and vice versa.....no one really knows.. figures media report are full potential value.

I’ve always wondered about this and been very confused when people don’t take this into account. The media never mentions it either which doesn’t help the negative narrative blasting players who don’t earn their salary when perennially injured.

There’s always posts like ‘Can’t believe we pay $X for Y years for Player Z’.

A guy like Gov has played (at a complete guess) 50% of his total potential games? Martin and Williams also missed considerable chunks this year.

There’s no way any entity could be as silly (not even Carlton) to draw up a contract where the end output is tangibly less than excepted and they still get paid the same.
 
Last edited:
Not even in the same ballpark
Dismissing LoB as not even in the same ballpark yet Amon was actively being shopped around by port 2 years but no teams were committed enough to pick him up. Elite kicks and runners early but were a tough soft and struggled to find enough ball to be impactful... they are literally almost identical in that regard, just one has come good and one is still in limbo.
 
Last edited:
Dismissing LoB as not even in the same ballpark yet Amon was actively being shopped around by port 2 years but no teams were committed enough to pick him up. Elite kicks and runners early but were a tough soft and struggled to find enough ball to be impactful... they are literally almost identical in that regard, just one has come good and one is still in limbo.

Look a little deeper

My comment was about those stats at the same age, Amon being part of a better side, less game time yet better numbers

Not sure about him being supposedly shopped around, but last year Pies were only offering a pick in the 70s for LOB and next year will be a rookie

Amon might be considered soft, being an outside finisher, but comparing the 2 players, he also has the better contested numbers.

I am glad LOB remains on the list, but if the price is right and being a free agent, Amon would walk into our starting 22
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Pretty apparent Amon had a breakout season this year - at age 25/26 with 100 odd games under his belt.

LOB is 4 years of age and 3 years of games behind.....

View attachment 1268739

Shifting the goal posts now?

No one has suggested that LOB can't improve, but based on the first table you posted, Amon had him covered at the same age.

But, back to my original post, regarding a few FAs next year. Try and form an argument for those named, not walking into our best 22
 
Comparing a 5 game 'career' to a 14 game 'career' is all but pointless.

Summary - no reason LOB can't be just as good as Amon in time.

He's a better user of the ball already.

So you posted the comparison and now you are calling it pointless? FMD

But going by your logic, if Tiger's Tom Lynch was a free agent, we shouldn't chase him because we have Harry?

We can comfortably fit LOB and Amon in the same side

As for the better user, Amon has him pipped for DE by foot
 
Last edited:
Pretty apparent Amon had a breakout season this year - at age 25/26 with 100 odd games under his belt.

LOB is 4 years of age and 3 years of games behind.....

View attachment 1268739

Living in Adelaide, I can vouch that until this season, he was Port fan's whipping boys, much like LOB.
 
Comparing a 5 game 'career' to a 14 game 'career' is all but pointless.

Summary - no reason LOB can't be just as good as Amon in time.

He's a better user of the ball already.
He is, wow I must have gone to the toilet when that happened. Amon has LOB by the nuts right now. LOB better change gears and in a hurry. Not saying he can’t, but so far he ain’t.
 
He is, wow I must have gone to the toilet when that happened. Amon has LOB by the nuts right now. LOB better change gears and in a hurry. Not saying he can’t, but so far he ain’t.

Not at all. You miss the point of the comparison.

As Gadj highlighted, Amon was seen as a liability till this year.

Plenty can turn it around given game time and patience. Will LOB?

Up to him. You suspect he will be given the opportunity.
 
I'm not disagreeing that Gov and Martin are on front ended contracts, but surely in their 4th and 3rd years into their contract it would've evened out into the average value by now?

In regards to Walsh, his contract extension in 2018 wouldn't have been for more than around 4-500k a year - in 2023 he'll be on around 1 mil.
No need to worry about our 2022 spendings. We are well placed.

Expect us to hit the draft, look for a free agent, sign Walsh on less than market value, spend the full cap, then have money to burn in 2023.
 
Pretty apparent Amon had a breakout season this year - at age 25/26 with 100 odd games under his belt.

LOB is 4 years of age and 3 years of games behind.....

View attachment 1268739

If LOB ever averages over 4 tackles a match, I will eat Andrew Walker's hat!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2021 List Management

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top