List Mgmt. 2021 Trade Targets

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

If I was north I’d definitely do that trade
If Adelaide gave up there 3 1st rounders they wouldn’t be able to get dawson so there team wouldn’t be that much better with jhf and if dawson went to the psd north could pick him up and they’d very much improve with him and ccj and potentially if both teams played bad next year could end up with 4 this year and 2 picks in the top 5 next year as well as demons pick. That would set them up very nicely
 
Stevros said:
If I was north I’d definitely do that trade
If Adelaide gave up there 3 1st rounders they wouldn’t be able to get dawson so there team wouldn’t be that much better with jhf and if dawson went to the psd north could pick him up and they’d very much improve with him and ccj and potentially if both teams played bad next year could end up with 4 this year and 2 picks in the top 5 next year as well as demons pick. That would set them up very nicely
Click to expand...
They sell the farm for him .... And ends up with us once his first contract runs out would be just to funny
 
Holden Hillbilly said:
North Melbourne rejected an astonishing offer of three first-round picks for the No.1 pick in this year’s draft, reports AFL Media.

Adelaide made the enormous bid this week, putting pick 4 on the table along with their 2022 first-round pick and Melbourne’s 2022 first-round pick, acquired this week.

Using the Draft Value Index, if the Crows and Demons finished in the same spots on the ladder in 2022, the offer would’ve been worth over 5000 draft points - essentially like having both the No.1 and No.4 picks combined.
Click to expand...

At what point over the weekend does Sydney talk to Dawson’s management and ask them to review the Port offer again after this has come out?
 
philthy05 said:
We’ve got the inside accumulator already in wines, we’ve got the young protege inside mid in drew. And we’ve got the older established player in boak.

our midfield had a deficiency last year, it was that quicker damaging midfielder.

adding Mitchell doesn’t solve that, we just get another accumulator and wines boak drew and Mitchell doesn’t work whatsoever, so we would be benching drew until boak at least is gone, tho I still think wines Mitchell and drew is still a slightly questionable mix after that.

and yeah, quick damaging mids aren’t easily available, cause the game has trended towards them (dunstan nearly unwanted and hewett didn’t even get another offer from Sydney and went to blues without any competition for him at all). So why would we prioritise a 28yr old plodding inside mid over the mid type we need to develop?

if we were to do an analysis of the leagues team lists and identifying who are the possible best inclusions, funnily enough I reckon butters, rozee, spp and Bergman would be the names at the top of the list.

we don’t even need to trade for any of them.

We already had butters earmarked to transition into a full time mid across this past season but was slowed down by that injury.
Bringing in a mid type that isn’t the fit we need next to wines and drew that holds butters and co out on the flanks would be such a waste.
Click to expand...
How much did those players accumulate in the first quarter against the bulldogs. A steady experienced mid like Mitchell would (possibly) stop the multiple onslaughts we had throughout the year in the centre. I agree we need Butters, Durrsma, Rozee, Bergman et al to develop into full time mids, but saying Mitchell adds nothing seems arrogant.
I’d also go Jaegar. If we could turn Ladhams and 16 into those two giddy up.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A fit Jaeger is great an injured one not so.
It's a bit like fantasia what ever games you get from him will be quality but will you get enough of them?
 
Jello_B said:
How much did those players accumulate in the first quarter against the bulldogs. A steady experienced mid like Mitchell would (possibly) stop the multiple onslaughts we had throughout the year in the centre. I agree we need Butters, Durrsma, Rozee, Bergman et al to develop into full time mids, but saying Mitchell adds nothing seems arrogant.
I’d also go Jaegar. If we could turn Ladhams and 16 into those two giddy up.
Click to expand...
Our starting midfield wont get better than last year. Rockliff hit form at the right time, Boak and Wines were at their best, Gray was still able to run through. SPP, Duursma, Ebert all fitter and able to contribute. Richmond had 41 clearances with 11 center clearances against us in the PF.

Replace Rockliff with Mitchell it makes no difference, the opposition can just play an extra player at stoppages and its game over for our coaches.
 
Good on the crows for having the stones tomput that offer together
 
Macca19 said:
Good on the crows for having the stones tomput that offer together
Click to expand...

They should have really gone for it and taken the second rounder off the table.
 
Powerade 08 said:
Our starting midfield wont get better than last year. Rockliff hit form at the right time, Boak and Wines were at their best, Gray was still able to run through. SPP, Duursma, Ebert all fitter and able to contribute. Richmond had 41 clearances with 11 center clearances against us in the PF.

Replace Rockliff with Mitchell it makes no difference, the opposition can just play an extra player at stoppages and its game over for our coaches.
Click to expand...

Don’t think we’ll be falling for that trick again, fukn hope not anyway


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
dirty2 said:
They sell the farm for him .... And ends up with us once his first contract runs out would be just to funny
Click to expand...

Wouldn't happen. I think that is why they are so desperate to get him. They know if it's not now, they won't be able to make a play until FA, and he will most likely come to Port.
 
Ford Fairlane said:
They should have really gone for it and taken the second rounder off the table.
Click to expand...
I thought the rules on trading 1sts and future 1sts would dictate that with no 1sts left they would have to retain/get back a 2nd, or something like that. Guess they could've gotten someone else's 2nd involved though.
 
I hope we have at least put the question to Dawson’s management again about coming to port.

If he’s set his mind on the crows no dramas but if their is doubt about the PSD, we should be all over that.

In fairness to the crows, they seem to have put some decent offers in so we might not be able to satisfy them either
 
powerrrrrrrrrrrr said:
I hope we have at least put the question to Dawson’s management again about coming to port.

If he’s set his mind on the crows no dramas but if their is doubt about the PSD, we should be all over that.

In fairness to the crows, they seem to have put some decent offers in so we might not be able to satisfy them either
Click to expand...
They may have been even harder on us getting some Aliir payback.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2021 Trade Targets

Similar threads

Rash
News Ivan Soldo's trade to St Kilda falls through
22 23 24 25 26
Replies
638
Views
31K
Duck Farmer
Duck Farmer
Enviable Tradition
2004 or 2021
2
Replies
26
Views
1K
RussellEbertHandball
RussellEbertHandball
Ford Fairlane
  • Locked
News Dan Houston traded to Collingwood
219 220 221 222 223
Replies
6K
Views
228K
Ford Fairlane
Ford Fairlane
Enviable Tradition
Trade week closest to the pin
2
Replies
28
Views
2K
JimmyBC
JimmyBC
Ford Fairlane
News Pick trade - future first for 23 and future second
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
129
Views
7K
Ford Fairlane
Ford Fairlane

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top