List Mgmt. 2021 Trade Targets

[Us against the rest]

I saw this on the Sydney thread. I don't mind this.

Trade: 12 + 31 for 16 and Ladhams

 

[Del165198]

Its disappointing to lose Ladhams

yep. still has massive potential imo.

 

[Del165198]

I saw this on the Sydney thread. I don't mind this.

Trade: 12 + 31 for 16 and Ladhams

12 to hawthorn for the jagerbomber? or is that overs at this stage of his career..

 

[Us against the rest]

12 to hawthorn for the jagerbomber? or is that overs at this stage of his career..

A little overs but it does put us in a good position.

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

I saw this on the Sydney thread. I don't mind this.

Trade: 12 + 31 for 16 and Ladhams

Pass, essentially pick 33 for ladhams.. who cares about a 4 pick decrease

 

[Schulzenfest]

I saw this on the Sydney thread. I don't mind this.

Trade: 12 + 31 for 16 and Ladhams

If we're not getting Dawson or Jaeger, I'd do this I reckon. If we are getting Jaeger though then we'd only be upgrading Hawthorn's pick here rather than our own, so there's no point.

 

[ash_78]

If we're not getting Dawson or Jaeger, I'd do this I reckon. If we are getting Jaeger though then we'd only be upgrading Hawthorn's pick here rather than our own, so there's no point.

Agree. But maybe it's the only way to satisfy Hawthorn.

 

[PAFC66]

Shouldnt have cost the club tens of thousands of dollars last year, become more professional during preseason and grown past his early career bullshit.

But he didnt, after multiple attempts to tell him to shape up or ship out he's being traded.

Though he was pretty good this year... It's literally the only time we've seen two rucks working successfully under ken

 

[Us against the rest]

Pass, essentially pick 33 for ladhams.. who cares about a 4 pick decrease

I still think that we will bend to something similar, you know (good faith) Aliir.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

I saw this on the Sydney thread. I don't mind this.

Trade: 12 + 31 for 16 and Ladhams

Values Ladhams at pick 24, unders but we do get an extra pick to play with.

 

[JakeNeadeFan]

The difference between the quality of player you will get at 16 and 12 is minimal. Pass

 

[PatientMental]

Though he was pretty good this year... It's literally the only time we've seen two rucks working successfully under ken

The list managers dont care how good you are if you're being deliberatly super destructive for the playing group.

 

[Ford Fairlane]

He's going he's staying he's going he's staying.

 

[Us against the rest]

Values Ladhams at pick 24, unders but we do get an extra pick to play with.

Yeah, I don't mind this. I think it's fair and sets a good trading example for other clubs and it shows the PAFC are a good club to deal with.

 

[JimmyBC]

The list managers dont care how good you are if you're being deliberatly super destructive for the playing geoup.

If you were being 'super destructive to the playing group' you wouldn't get a game at all, stop being a drama queen.

 

[Us against the rest]

The difference between the quality of player you will get at 16 and 12 is minimal. Pass

Looks better than 16 but single digits would be nice.

 

[JakeNeadeFan]

Looks better than 16 but single digits would be nice.

The numbers are irrelevant. It's the players available at the picks that matter.

 

[Us against the rest]

The list managers dont care how good you are if you're being deliberatly super destructive for the playing group.

Do you know something that you would like to share?

 

[Waspy79]

if ladhams becomes a gun elsewhere we should sack hinkley. matter of fact, sack him anyway.

Let's see how Hayes turns out. It was probably lose him or Ladhams. I still can't understand why Hayes wasn't given a go in 2021.

Ladhams doesn't strike me as an overly competent ruck, but he has a very unique skill set for a tall. He could become a bit like Nankervis which would be annoying.

 

[PatientMental]

If you were being 'super destructive to the playing group' you wouldn't get a game at all, stop being a drama queen.

“If he wants to have a career as a professional footballer, he’ll need to act in a far better manner than he has right now, as will Dan, specifically at this footy club"

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

If we don’t hear any big news about JOM by this time tomorrow, it ain’t happening

 

[PatientMental]

Do you know something that you would like to share?

Outside of the common knowledge him and the other bloke shopped around spent a large chunk of the 2021 preseason attempting to transform into fish? Nope.

 

[JimmyBC]

“If he wants to have a career as a professional footballer, he’ll need to act in a far better manner than he has right now, as will Dan, specifically at this footy club"

And?

 

[Jojay]

We are not allowed to talk about trading Wingard back to Port, all my posts on Chad being traded back got moved to the The graveyard thread for endless off topic posturing on persons causing bi-polar responses.
I have no idea why, a dicussion about trading for Wingard is List management & Trade Targets.
So annoyed.

Don't sweat the small stuff m8. I copped the same

 

[PatientMental]

And?

Guess peter never decided to 'act in a far better manner' so hes getting the boot.