Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the problem with all these discussions. No one knows what players are being paid. And how much a player is being paid is critical in a salary cap sport.With all due respect, how do you know?
I'm not saying he did or didn't sacrifice for the sake of the club, I just think this board talks about players salaries as fact. We neatly sort our players into underpaid or overpaid and if they're the former, they're a selfless team player, and if they're the latter, then they're overrated and hurting the team.
Do not agree at all.
With McDonald, McLean & Amartey, I see the potential for the best forward line in the competition. Ironically I'm not sure I see an All Australian forward spot for any one of those three, even McDonald. Very talented as he may be, he doesn't strike me as someone who is going to be a dominant, 60-goal a season forward. I see him as more of a mover and a playmaker, working up and down the ground, delivering inside 50 and using his smarts inside 50 to create more goals for others than he scores for himself. But even if he is dominant, he's going to need support. As we saw with Buddy, you can have the best forward in the game but if he doesn't have the right pieces around him, then the forward line won't necessarily function.
McLean & Amartey will be vital to this. I see McLean as the ying to McDonald's yang. He is everything McDonald is not. A big, contested clunking mark we can park in the goal square and allow McDonald to roam further up. And Amartey with the potential to be the very handy third wheel, helping out in the ruck but also laying tackles and applying pressure inside 50 better than the other two can.
McDonald the athletic pillar.
McLean the contested pillar.
Amartey the pressure pillar.
Without any of those three, I think there's a good chance we won't get to see the best of the other two.
Bookmark this post. They will make an outstanding forward trio.
This is great fan fiction but has 0 chance of actually eventuating. McLean and Armatey are good depth and that's about where it ends
I think McLean is a late bloomer and will continue to grow. He's had some purple patches of ripping form to suggest he has some ability to him but he's struggling to keep it together. Out of the 2 he's the one I'd prefer we lock downYeah I'm not sold on either Amartey or McLean being genuine long term prospects. Would be very glad to be proven wrong but I don't see it.
Yeah, I'm not sold on them individually either, but I think there's a case to be made that complementary forwards can produce a greater result as a sum, than the individual parts. Not to be forgotten is Heeney, and as Parker gets older, him. Papley etc.This is great fan fiction but has 0 chance of actually eventuating. McLean and Armatey are good depth and that's about where it ends
Yeah, I'm not sold on them individually either, but I think there's a case to be made that complementary forwards can produce a greater result as a sum, than the individual parts. Not to be forgotten is Heeney, and as Parker gets older, him. Papley etc.
Looking at 2012, we won a flag with a forward line that on paper didn't really look world-beating. We had a young Reid, Goodes spent more time there, LRT played a role, then we had Jetta lead the goalkicking, plus McGlynn and a bunch of midfielders kicking 20+ goals. That might be our avenue going forward. Don't have Buddy kicking 50+, but a host of players around the 20-40 mark (Heeney (40-50), Papley (30-40), Reid, the 3 younger KPFs, Hayward might be good for 20-30), working together to get an even contribution.
Don't get me wrong, as I said, I'm not sold on McLean or Amartey being guns individually, and we're a far better prospect at a flag with Buddy imo, it's not all doom and gloom though.
View attachment 1466502
LRT “played a role”?Yeah, I'm not sold on them individually either, but I think there's a case to be made that complementary forwards can produce a greater result as a sum, than the individual parts. Not to be forgotten is Heeney, and as Parker gets older, him. Papley etc.
Looking at 2012, we won a flag with a forward line that on paper didn't really look world-beating. We had a young Reid, Goodes spent more time there, LRT played a role, then we had Jetta lead the goalkicking, plus McGlynn and a bunch of midfielders kicking 20+ goals. That might be our avenue going forward. Don't have Buddy kicking 50+, but a host of players around the 20-40 mark (Heeney (40-50), Papley (30-40), Reid, the 3 younger KPFs, Hayward might be good for 20-30), working together to get an even contribution.
Don't get me wrong, as I said, I'm not sold on McLean or Amartey being guns individually, and we're a far better prospect at a flag with Buddy imo, it's not all doom and gloom though.
View attachment 1466502
I'm talking over the season clearly, and he played at both ends. Nothing but respect for The Hyphenator.LRT “played a role”?
My good sir - he was robbed of a Norm Smith!
I don't think it's a stretch to say he probably should have had the order of Australia medal that year too.LRT “played a role”?
My good sir - he was robbed of a Norm Smith!
Oh and you had Clarke, Fox, Stephens and Reid being best 22 in a top 4 side on your bingo card?This is great fan fiction but has 0 chance of actually eventuating. McLean and Armatey are good depth and that's about where it ends
This is great fan fiction but has 0 chance of actually eventuating. McLean and Armatey are good depth and that's about where it ends
Yeah, I'd still like us to pick up a KPF or a swingman over the next draft or two, preferably as early as possible. Once Buddy, Reid go, and Hickey (thus needing Ladhams to be no.1 ruck), it'd be nice to have a depth/developing KPF behind Logan, McLean, Amartey assuming they all stay and are in the 22.A reminder that last year's premiership
forward line was Fritsch (who isn't even 190cm), McDonald (who is basically just a swingman), Brown (who most on this board didn't even rate when we could get him for SFA), and Jackson (who was 20).
Their goals for the year were 59, 33, 25 and 16 respectively.
And yet they won the most dominant premiership in a decade.
You don't need a star-studded forward line - though with the likes of Heeney, Papley and, yes, potentially McDonald, we may already have that. You just need a cohesive group that functions well with quality supply from the mids, of which I think we will have.
Oh and you had Clarke, Fox, Stephens and Reid being best 22 in a top 4 side on your bingo card?
Don't have to be a star to be a pillar.Fox and Reid aren't all that surprising. Fox has been solid every time he plays, joke he got dropped for the GWS final. Reid good last year, has been best 22 in many top 4 sides, biggest surprise is he's stayed healthy.
Stephens was a top 5 pick who's taken a nice step forward. If somebody told me at the start of the year that he was going to break into the 22 and play some decent football then I wouldn't have been blown away. I'd be blown away if Amartey or Mclean (let alone both!) are "pillars of the best forward line in the league".
Clarke has surprised me, I thought the coaches had given up on him. But he's a solid role player fulfilling a niche as a tagger. He's not a "pillar of the best forward line in the league"
We must be reading different stories then.Footy news has suddenly gone quiet on the crows camp
Almost had me worried there, I was like "Lachie Rankin isn't from SA!?!" Worth the $4mil though.We must be reading different stories then.
In the meantime Crows do their usual rort and offer Rankin $4mill to come on home and I bet they'll try and hold on to their #4.
Lowballing him I reckon.Almost had me worried there, I was like "Lachie Rankin isn't from SA!?!" Worth the $4mil though.