List Mgmt. 2022 List Management and trading thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shame salary cap dumps weren't acceptable when Brad Crouch was a free agent.

****ing AFL.
 
Have you even seen Bowes play? Or just jumped on Footywire for some empty stats?

Bowes is best 22 at AFC every day of the week. Good user of the ball, hard at it, can play defense in the Nick's mold, and is being starved of opportunity. Has played well in the 2's after a s**t run with injuries. Given a clear run at a full preseason, he's a weapon off halfback or as an outside mid.
Yeah amazing how many goals he kicked in VFL this year playing in the back pocket hey...He immediately becomes our best midfield kick the day he walks through the doors if he lobs with us. I mean 3 goals in one game from the back pocket is a pretty amazing effort...
 
Have you even seen Bowes play? Or just jumped on Footywire for some empty stats?

Bowes is best 22 at AFC every day of the week. Good user of the ball, hard at it, can play defense in the Nick's mold, and is being starved of opportunity. Has played well in the 2's after a s**t run with injuries. Given a clear run at a full preseason, he's a weapon off halfback or as an outside mid.
I don't think you have tracked this discussion.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Yeah amazing how many goals he kicked in VFL this year playing in the back pocket hey...He immediately becomes our best midfield kick the day he walks through the doors if he lobs with us. I mean 3 goals in one game from the back pocket is a pretty amazing effort...
does anyone know if he has any connection to rankine? is this actually a credible report? would definitely be an interesting pickup.
 
Yeah amazing how many goals he kicked in VFL this year playing in the back pocket hey...He immediately becomes our best midfield kick the day he walks through the doors if he lobs with us. I mean 3 goals in one game from the back pocket is a pretty amazing effort...
Reinventing the position in the GCS reserves...
 
Well, if they want to salary dump Bowes and need a cheap small forward:

2023 1st and Rowe for Rankine, Bowes and pick 34.
 
In:
Pick 5
Max Michalanney
Izak Rankine
Jack Bowes
2 Rookie upgrades (Butts & Strachan)
3 Rookie picks (Turner, Key Defender, Key Forward/Ruck)

Out:
Fischer McAsey
Billy Frampton
James Rowe
Luke Brown
Paul Seedsmen
One of: Jackson Hately/Will Hamill/Andrew McPherson???
Ben Davis

Thoughts.
 
In:
Pick 5
Max Michalanney
Izak Rankine
Jack Bowes
2 Rookie upgrades (Butts & Strachan)
3 Rookie picks (Turner, Key Defender, Key Forward/Ruck)

Out:
Fischer McAsey
Billy Frampton
James Rowe
Luke Brown
Paul Seedsmen
One of: Jackson Hately/Will Hamill/Andrew McPherson???
Ben Davis

Thoughts.
Zero chance of Jack Bowes happening, that's a BF fantasy of 20th Sept 2022, nothing more, nothing less.

Seedsman is likely to be moved to the rookie list, then placed on the inactive list. His rookie position would then be filled via the PSSP or MSD - but it could be a KPD or KPF so you could end up being correct there (in a roundabout way).

Players supposedly linked to trades are Crouch, Frampton, Rowe & Sholl, with McAsey more a case of wishful thinking. Pretty much no chance of anything happening with Hately, Hamill or McPherson. It remains to be seen how many contracted players we end up trading.
 
In:
Pick 5
Max Michalanney
Izak Rankine
Jack Bowes
2 Rookie upgrades (Butts & Strachan)
3 Rookie picks (Turner, Key Defender, Key Forward/Ruck)

Out:
Fischer McAsey
Billy Frampton
James Rowe
Luke Brown
Paul Seedsmen
One of: Jackson Hately/Will Hamill/Andrew McPherson???
Ben Davis

Thoughts.
If Bowes is included in a deal with Rankine, it likely involves pick 5. I'm not suggesting that's a balanced trade, but I do feel GCS aren't going to cop a future first and they will want to get creative.

Probs 5 + cheap player back.
 
I'm happy to pay out a contracted player that just isn't going to make it. Obviously the cheaper the better but if it's Murphy, Hately, McPherson or Crouch then so be it.

Imagine being stuck with one of these playing all year in the SANFL when, with a bit of creativity, we could have made a spot to bring in a quality salary dump player or even Hollands.
 
Probably because we want to keep them? I would have thought that was obvious?

We've signed the players we wanted to retain, and left the others uncontracted. The problem is that some of the uncontracted players have gone backwards (e.g. Crouch) or haven't developed as hoped (e.g. Sholl), and we now find ourselves wanting to offload them. Note that neither of these players were signed to new contracts this year.
Gollant, Parnell, Himmelberg and Hinge were signed during this season. That was 2 too many.

I would have signed Hinge and one of the other 3 ….. most likely Himmelberg, least likely Gollant.
 
I'm happy to pay out a contracted player that just isn't going to make it. Obviously the cheaper the better but if it's Murphy, Hately, McPherson or Crouch then so be it.

Imagine being stuck with one of these playing all year in the SANFL when, with a bit of creativity, we could have made a spot to bring in a quality salary dump player or even Hollands.
I love Hollands and think we should chase him when he’s OOC, but why are we even bringing him up?

Pure fantasy
 
I'm happy to pay out a contracted player that just isn't going to make it. Obviously the cheaper the better but if it's Murphy, Hately, McPherson or Crouch then so be it.

Imagine being stuck with one of these playing all year in the SANFL when, with a bit of creativity, we could have made a spot to bring in a quality salary dump player or even Hollands.
mcpherson should be paid out there is no way he is playing again and not possible to trade

the others you mention we should be looking to trade out too
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

With all teams having limited list numbers still, we're not going to find it that easy to trade away contracted players.

We also will find it hard to delist contracted players - I believe their pay out needs to happen within this year's salary cap, otherwise they continue on our list if we're paying them next year (or including them in salary cap figures).
 
With all teams having limited list numbers still, we're not going to find it that easy to trade away contracted players.

We also will find it hard to delist contracted players - I believe their pay out needs to happen within this year's salary cap, otherwise they continue on our list if we're paying them next year (or including them in salary cap figures).
agree
that's why you try doesn't mean you can.
i think we all agree crouch will be gone. someone will take him I still think a likely home is port now dunkley is out of frame
 
Trying to be realistic -

  • Brown retiring takes us to 36/6
  • Strachan and Butts upgrades takes us to 38/4
  • Davis delisting takes us to 38/3
  • Delisting and re-rookieing Seedsman takes us to 37/4 (one pick)
  • Trading Frampton takes us to two picks
  • Delist/trade Rowe takes us to three picks.

That's the heart of it.

I think we see what market there is for Crouch, Sholl, McAsey and others but I'm not imagining a lot.

We probably want one more transaction (probably Sholl?), so we can have Rankine, Michalanney and two picks.

If we manage to move two players, perhaps we get in the trade market for someone else.
 
I love Hollands and think we should chase him when he’s OOC, but why are we even bringing him up?

Pure fantasy
because that wont be easy
might be better to push GC now as part of the rankine trade if they keep insisting on this pick 5 rubbish

if we cant get phillipou cos pick 5 is traded, hollands needs to be part of it IMO.
 
Can we move contracted players not named Seedsman to the rookie list?
Yes, but it doesn't necessarily open up more picks. It COULD be done just by delisting and re-rookieing, and shuffling the numbers of main and rookie list players.

The way it opens up an actual spot is you delist Turner and only re-sign him when you move Seedsman to the LTI list, which wouldn't be a bad play.
 
because that wont be easy
might be better to push GC now as part of the rankine trade if they keep insisting on this pick 5 rubbish

if we cant get phillipou cos pick 5 is traded, hollands needs to be part of it IMO.
You should ask for Margot Robbie instead, she's on the Gold Coast.
 
Yes, but it doesn't necessarily open up more picks. It COULD be done just by delisting and re-rookieing, and shuffling the numbers of main and rookie list players.

The way it opens up an actual spot is you delist Turner and only re-sign him when you move Seedsman to the LTI list, which wouldn't be a bad play.
I'd keep Turner on the list. I'd happily move someone like McPherson to the rookie list if it meant opening up an extra senior list spot

Senior List Outs: Rowe, Frampton, Brown, Seedsman(?), Crouch(?), McPherson(?)
Senior List Ins: Strachan, Butts, Rankine, Pick ???, Michalanney, Pick ???/Bowes

Rookie List Outs: Butts, Strachan, Davis
Rookie List Ins: Turner, McPherson, SSP (Seedsman)

Depends if we think we need an extra senior list spot or not
 
because that wont be easy
might be better to push GC now as part of the rankine trade if they keep insisting on this pick 5 rubbish

if we cant get phillipou cos pick 5 is traded, hollands needs to be part of it IMO.
Will it though?

IMO that's just gonna push the SUNS further away from co-operating

We need to be realistic, as much as fans might not like it. If we get something along with Rankine for pick 5, it will be worth it
 
I love Hollands and think we should chase him when he’s OOC, but why are we even bringing him up?

Pure fantasy
Doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

Every year there are trades made that completely mystify me. The trades that saw PAFC get those 3 picks in the 2018 draft, Treloar to WB, Smith then Shiel to Ess. And the inevitable el cheapo trading of Hopper and Taranto to Richmond.

I want some of that action!!
 
Is it though?

IMO that's just gonna push the SUNS further away from co-operating

We need to be realistic, as much as fans might not like it. If we get something along with Rankine for pick 5, it will be worth it
what Im saying is pick 5 is off the table unless it included hollands

even if its pick 5, F1 and something else for the two of them I would do it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top