On face value it was a failure considering we were 8 and 2 and we lost our last 4 games. In isolation it clearly is a failure.
- Martin missed 10 games
- McGovern missed 15
- Williams missed 13
- Marchbank 18
- Pittonet 14
- Cuningham season
- honey we barely got him going before he did a calf
- Weiters missed 5 and was not the same when back
- Saad clearly hampered. Walsh the same
- Hewett missed 7
- Kennedy missed 5
- Boyd missed the last 8
- McKay missed 3 but was hampered before and seems to be having shoulder problems again
- Newman missed the last 4 (went off first half v Adelaide)
- stocker and TDk missed months of the preseason (and it showed)
- Cerra missed 4 games
Compare that to Pies
- 16 guys played either every game or close to
- Adam’s missed 5
- Grundy missed most of the year
- de Goey missed 6
- Elliot missed 6
That’s it. Very close to their best side was on the park all year. No overlap in injuires to Elliot and De Goey. Only 1 game overlap in injury to De Goey and Adams. Full credit to their fitness crew. And professionalism of players.
It meant they got to practice in game situations all year. We need to determine how to get there with our list. THAT is the biggest gap by a mile.
But, the extraordinary amount of injuries didn't help. You are right, Collingwood had their team together most of the year, practice, instinct, where to run to, understanding each other's role is so much more easier.
Out defence was decimated the majority of the year, unable to help, unable to understand where everyone else was, trusting where to spoil the ball to knowing you have a teammate where you think they should be. Then our midfield was decimated towards the end of the year, including missing Pitt for the majority of the year.
We were improvising for the whole year. Still, cannot give it a pass mark because of what happened the last 4 weeks. But won't call it a failure for the above reasons.