List Mgmt. 2022 Trade, Draft, etc thread

[Scythe94]

Dory_77 – might be worth pinning this? Gets updated after every move.

 

[Dudoro]

Would you guys consider:
13, 37, F1, Freo F1 for 4,22

All those first rounders will be teens and this draft drops away after first dozen. Please don’t abuse me

Seems my prediction from a couple days ago could come to fruition

 

[schmuttt]

Hmmmm wondering if part of why we are trying to ship out future firsts is because we know someone is leaving (e.g Kozzie) and will be getting some back next year.

Hope not and hope we don't trade the picks.

If Kozzy goes I'd rather target Duursma or Butters than picks.

 

[Down the throat]

View attachment 1562150

I trust JT, but gee, you'd want to be pretty certain about the prospects of whoever goes at pick 4 (5) if this were to go ahead.

 

[Headless]

Your all so negative

Good point.

 

[MarcMaverick]

Good point.

Bad Exclamation Mark!

 

[Fork n Hell]

if we grab pick 4 then i'm guessing we're going to take Bailey Humphrey.

 

[Bluelegs]

I think Jefferson is much better aerially than weideman.

But I do think its more a matter of desperation. We need forwards desperately.

No point if they're not good enough to play senior football.

 

[danster168]

No point if they're not good enough to play senior football.

dude, we're playing Ben Brown. Ben friggin Brown. He's vfl reserves standard. So Jefferson is already better than Ben Brown so it's an immediate upgrade if the coaches aren't as stubborn as they were this year.

 

[Bluelegs]

dude, we're playing Ben Brown. Ben friggin Brown. He's vfl reserves standard. So Jefferson is already better than Ben Brown so it's an immediate upgrade if the coaches aren't as stubborn as they were this year.

 

[Jordie_tackles]

if we grab pick 4 then i'm guessing we're going to take Bailey Humphrey.

Was pointed out In the draft board, why go for pick 6 and lower if the player is likely to be there at 7? Seems it would be Humphrey

 

[The Dr]

dude, we're playing Ben Brown. Ben friggin Brown. He's vfl reserves standard. So Jefferson is already better than Ben Brown so it's an immediate upgrade if the coaches aren't as stubborn as they were this year.

Lol


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Crusty Demon]

Was pointed out In the draft board, why go for pick 6 and lower if the player is likely to be there at 7? Seems it would be Humphrey

Humphrey looks solid. Just not convincing by foot from what I've seen. Can't teach a bloke to find the footy and be tough over the ball and in the contest though, and he has these qualities. Not sure I'd be happy to basically trade Dogga for just this kid though. Must be tempting for the Bombers.

 

[danster168]

Lol


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

it's just a massive contradiction to say you don't want to bring in a guy who isn't unto AFL standard when that's who our key forward is.

Also, the kid is 18 years old. He has a very high ceiling.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Seems my prediction from a couple days ago could come to fruition

**** you Adrian, youre ripping us off.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Not sure I'd be happy to basically trade Dogga for just this kid though.

Its worse than that, we are giving up our own pick also. I trust JT, but **** me, Humphrey would need to be a superstar for this to work out.

If we somehow get George out Hewett at 22 also id feel a lot better about this.

 

[Topkent]

We are giving up more than Geelong paid for Jeremy Cameron

5

Jeremy Cameron

Age

31

Ht

196cm

Wt

94kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

12.5

3star

K

9.0

3star

HB

3.4

3star

M

5.4

5star

T

1.6

4star

G

2.6

5star

D

10.0

3star

K

7.1

3star

HB

2.9

2star

M

4.6

4star

T

2.0

3star

G

1.9

5star

D

8.2

2star

K

5.0

2star

HB

3.2

3star

M

4.6

5star

T

2.4

4star

G

2.0

5star

. That's a ****ing stupid over pay for a teenager

 

[Topkent]

We are offering Luke Jackson

9

Luke Jackson

Age

22

Ht

199cm

Wt

102kg

Pos.

F/R

Career

Season

Last 5

D

8.3

2star

K

3.3

1star

HB

5.0

4star

M

1.5

2star

T

1.0

3star

G

0.3

3star

D

8.3

2star

K

3.3

1star

HB

5.0

3star

M

1.5

2star

T

1.0

2star

G

0.3

3star

D

8.3

3star

K

3.3

2star

HB

5.0

4star

M

1.5

2star

T

1.0

3star

G

0.3

3star

and our first from this for pick 4. Anyone who thinks that's a good idea has rocks in their head.

 

[Pilbara Dee]

Excellent news that we've signed a 206cm project ruck as our Category B rookie.

Kills off any suggestion of taking an 18 year old beanpole in the draft on the off chance they turn out to be Max Gawn II

And with his basketball background he will obviously be a 206cm Scott Pendlebury so that should be handy.

Was playing bball on scholarship in US on the grind session in North America at same institute that Anthony Wiggins and Jamal Murray attended. Didn’t want to spend more time overseas. Played footy right up until almost 16 primarily as a CHF and CHB. Had interest from multiple AFL clubs and was asked not to play in 2022 especially for cat B opportunity. Like all big kids needs time, and not playing TAC might need more adjustment time again but the difference is that he was genuine draft material.

 

[danster168]

We are offering Luke Jackson and our first from this for pick 4. Anyone who thinks that's a good idea has rocks in their head.

agree. Jason Taylor must be frothing over someone. I really don't like trading 1sts like they mean nothing.

 

[Topkent]

agree. Jason Taylor must be frothing over someone. I really don't like trading 1sts like they mean nothing.

Also I'm not across all of this draft but aren't the guys in the 2-7 range mids? I think we need another mid who's more mid forward than inside but I'd back us to get a good one with 3 pics in the teens vs dumping it all into one top 5 mid. Seems like insanity to me. If there was a 210cm key forward I could kinda get it even though it's an over pay still

 

[danster168]

Also I'm not across all of this draft but aren't the guys in the 2-7 range mids? I think we need another mid who's more mid forward than inside but I'd back us to get a good one with 3 pics in the teens vs dumping it all into one top 5 mid. Seems like insanity to me. If there was a 210cm key forward I could kinda get it even though it's an over pay still

yeah it seems like a massive overpay to me too. I am curious as to which kid he believes is worth this much tho.
it's sort of strange that we're interested in Sydney's pick too. because we either rate the pick in the teens or we don't. it's a bit confusing. Also being interested in gws' early 2nd round pick. it's almost like Taylor really hates being in the pick 13-15 range.

 

[pjfairbairn]

Unless we think Sheezel is miraculously going to be there, I don't get it.

 

[givemethecure]

I will enjoy learning about whoever the heck we end up drafting once they have some stage managed reveal of their first senior game where they are suprised by Goody driving a tractor mower around the area behind the kiosk on the scoreboard side at Casey while said man child is picking up rubbish as part of some sort of hazing practice. Until then, drafts are boring, and tiny baby footballers are boring.

 

[Tulip]

I trust JT implicitly tbh. His track record is as close to flawless as you'll get with 10 drafts behind him and only one or two howlers.

 

[givemethecure]

I trust JT implicitly tbh. His track record is as close to flawless as you'll get with 10 drafts behind him and only one or two howlers.

P much. It's no benefit to me personally to give any shits about anything that's said about any small baby footballer child until they are worthy of a senior game.