- Oct 17, 2016
- 1,508
- 3,978
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Amartey would have been in the 3rd group so would have started 30 seconds after Stephens.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
After or before?Amartey would have been in the 3rd group so would have started 30 seconds after Stephens.
After. As I understand it they stagger the time trials into groups based on their past/expected results. (Or something like that - cannot remember where I heard this.)After or before?
Have you written to them to let them know what you want to see? They are pretty responsive, and you may well find out that our media 'bites' are distributed by the AFL and there is nothing the Swans can do...After. As I understand it they stagger the time trials into groups based on their past/expected results. (Or something like that - cannot remember where I heard this.)
You could also see Clarke, Gulden and Rampe in the background of the Stephens/Fox video. All regular time trial kings, all likely in that first group.
I'm pretty sure the time trials have been shared almost exclusively by Stephens & Fox over the last few years. Good for them but IMO it makes it boring for us fans, because our media team's coverage of the time trials sucks, and we generally only see and hear about the top 2/3, and when it's the same 2/3 every time - which it is - then what are we learning?
I realise I am sounding like an absolute curmudgeon when it comes to our media team lately, but I'd rather hear about who achieved PBs, than which one of the same usual suspects won the time trial.
I don't know why he got paid anything. We did not pick up Angus McLennan. Saints did.Hard to argue with this line-up but gee whiz some lucky prick at Fox Footy just pocketed what I'm sure was a decent paycheck for copy and pasting our exact line-up from the preliminary final side
The 32 fresh faces who’ll force their way into Rd 1 teams... and who’ll miss out: AFL best 22s
The 32 fresh faces who’ll force their way into Rd 1 teams... and who’ll miss out: AFL best 22swww.foxsports.com.au
Slow, big tank, average speed and poor agility. Sounds like the car I just raced with when getting flogged playing Mario Kart.Pyke was 204cm and had sensational speed and agility for his size. McLean is 197cm comparatively slow with good marking ability, excellent kick , big tank and average speed with poor agility.
They are nothing alike.
Sent from my SM-T865 using Tapatalk
Ladhams over Reid is an interesting one when Hickey is still in the sideB D.Rampe T.McCartin R.Fox
HB N.Blakely P.McCartin J.Lloyd
C O.Florent C.Mills J.Mclernery
HF E.Gulden L.McDonald W.Hayward
F T.Papley L.Franklin I.Heeney
FOLL- T.Hickey L.Parker C.Warner
I/C- J.Rowbottom, D.Stephens, R.Clarke, P.Ladhams
When we first traded Ladhams and Reid had just scraped another year that's how I thought we were going to line up, with Ladhams in the role Reid made his own.Ladhams over Reid is an interesting one when Hickey is still in the side
Whilst you are correct, I am kinda tired of relying on ReidAt the moment, I'd say Reid is in our half a dozen most important players for next season. He's clearly our most important key forward.
Buddy cannot be the focal point anymore, and it's unreasonable to expect it of McDonald.
Reid's body is the only thing that would stop him from being a lock.
Whilst you are correct, I am kinda tired of relying on Reid
We haven't really relied on him much in recent times, to be fair. We're also not really relying on him going forward either - we've got a very good forward set-up.Whilst you are correct, I am kinda tired of relying on Reid
I don't disagree with anything about this but I just find him just unreliable enough to make me worryWe haven't really relied on him much in recent times, to be fair. We're also not really relying on him going forward either - we've got a very good forward set-up.
He's still our best contested mark, and there's probably an argument to be made that he was one of the best contested marks in the comp for a large part of this season. There's probably even an argument to be made that he was the best resting ruck in the competition this season other than Blicavs.
I disagree. Too many players in his position fighting for his spot to consider any KPF bar Franklin a lock. Reid's work up the ground is replaceable, and so is his backup ruckwork. Those are what made him fantastic in 2022 but they are by no means only skills he alone possesses.At the moment, I'd say Reid is in our half a dozen most important players for next season. He's clearly our most important key forward.
Buddy cannot be the focal point anymore, and it's unreasonable to expect it of McDonald.
Reid's body is the only thing that would stop him from being a lock.
Tbf I am probably not making sense. A fit and in form Sam Reid is best 22 every week
I wouldn't mind being accused as a curmudgeon. Sounds cool!!After. As I understand it they stagger the time trials into groups based on their past/expected results. (Or something like that - cannot remember where I heard this.)
You could also see Clarke, Gulden and Rampe in the background of the Stephens/Fox video. All regular time trial kings, all likely in that first group.
I'm pretty sure the time trials have been shared almost exclusively by Stephens & Fox over the last few years. Good for them but IMO it makes it boring for us fans, because our media team's coverage of the time trials sucks, and we generally only see and hear about the top 2/3, and when it's the same 2/3 every time - which it is - then what are we learning?
I realise I am sounding like an absolute curmudgeon when it comes to our media team lately, but I'd rather hear about who achieved PBs, than which one of the same usual suspects won the time trial.
Amartey is the closest Reid clone that we have. It would be up to him to aim for that role in the 1s this preseason and take it.I disagree. Too many players in his position fighting for his spot to consider any KPF bar Franklin a lock. Reid's work up the ground is replaceable, and so is his backup ruckwork. Those are what made him fantastic in 2022 but they are by no means only skills he alone possesses.
I'm gonna slightly tweak what other people have been saying. I'm sick of Horse relying on Reid. Yes he was arguably in career form in 2022, yes he's more than earned his extension, yes he's rightly penciled in for Round 1 currently, yes we should be putting out our most competitive team every week regardless of age and experience while we're in a contending window. I just wish that Horse would give guys like Logan, McLean, and Amartey more than like 2 weeks worth of chances before falling back on Reid. Yes he gave them all extended runs but rarely together, instead it's Buddy+Reid+X. I just want to see if there's a winning formula or at the bare minimum some good chemistry between these three, hell we've already seen briefly that McLean and McDonald compliment each other well. We have to develop for the future, Buddy's already confirmed to be retiring in 2023 and Reid is one bad patch of form/injury away from joining him. We can't rely on these two if we want to succeed beyond next year
That is what I want to be!!