There's a link in the post aboveFrom the article below:
"For instance, it would have allowed Adelaide to list one of Rory Sloane or Taylor Walker as a veteran for 2024 and opened up another spot on their primary list. The idea was designed to keep veterans in the game without sacrificing a list spot that a youngster may have taken, with the veteran’s full payments still counted in the salary cap."
Roos target pick one, Dee to go on, big Dog to stay
Check out all the latest trade news from around the Leaguewww.afl.com.au
List Mgmt. 2023 List Management and Trading (Part 2)
- Thread starter Crows I Am
- Start date
- Tagged users None
FR0GGY
From a cartel villa in Tuscany
Assuming the change is higher than 4, yep.
What would we have to give GCS to get Chol and 4?
I am assuming Chol comes as a salary dump so do we just add up our two second rounders plus another one we will get for Doedee or McAdam to handsomely exceed the 2034 points get for Pick 4.
That gives us Picks 4 and 9 plus Chol plus Hayward who we can probably get for McAdam and a future something in a three way trade with Sydney and Melbourne.
While I'm on a roll perhaps we can get Burgess plus chips for a whatever we get for McHenry or Himmelberg
And then there's Petty. Swap our nine and whatever we get for Himmelberg or McHenry or both with Sydney for Petty and 11
I am assuming Chol comes as a salary dump so do we just add up our two second rounders plus another one we will get for Doedee or McAdam to handsomely exceed the 2034 points get for Pick 4.
That gives us Picks 4 and 9 plus Chol plus Hayward who we can probably get for McAdam and a future something in a three way trade with Sydney and Melbourne.
While I'm on a roll perhaps we can get Burgess plus chips for a whatever we get for McHenry or Himmelberg
And then there's Petty. Swap our nine and whatever we get for Himmelberg or McHenry or both with Sydney for Petty and 11
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 88,045
- 94,003
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Not worth 2x 1sts & 2nd though.
Would prefer to offer 2x 1sts to get q known gun midfielder not a maybe.
- Jul 19, 2010
- 26,960
- 72,482
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 88,045
- 94,003
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Yeah, I'm more concerned with bringing in solid experienced players to give the squad depth needed with out players leaving.
If we bring in the likes of Hayward, Choi & Burgess for McAdam, Himmelberg & Doedee... this gives us a decent squad to challenge for finals.
Reckon we are more of a chance to get the Bulldogs 1st rounder as part of them getting pick #4... which would give us 2 high picks.
Yep . you're on a roll
Love it!!!Yep . you're on a roll
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 88,045
- 94,003
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Cook looks like someone who plays better at a higher level.
Has the class, just a question of his desire. Shouldn't have been dropped after his 1 game imo.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 88,045
- 94,003
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
We will wait till he is a FA.
Yeah, though bearing in mind he'll be a RFA
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 88,045
- 94,003
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Still won't be a problem.
Who knows, everything could change in 12 months - this years trade period looked pretty boring a few weeks ago and is now getting funny and weird
Burgess won't be on that much, will need to combine both of his and Chol's salaries.
Golumless
A bigger deal out west.
Because - on the off chance this has legs - I think there is a genuine case that adding Cox now could push us into being a big contender in 2024. After all, the game for next year is fixing our defense and this is a big upgrade on all of our key defenders. Not only that, but we've built a counter-attack identity and Cox should suit that to a tee being a reliable one-on-one player, strong aerially and a reliable field kick. Factor in that putting in very good players into the line-up is the quickest way to improve a sector and that our main defenders are young as well means this addition could have more bang-for-buck influence then just adding a really good player.
As to why we should push our chips to the table if he's available? The first reason is we need to be looking at making the most of Dawson as he looks every bit of that elite midfielder teams need to go deep. The other major one is the league is in a transitional phase at the moment. Plus, the elephant in the room is this does not look like a draft where we'll be able to fix our inside midfield issues - not in time to match up with Dawson at any rate. So if you were angling to begin an all-in push, honestly, it doesn't look like a bad place to start.
Surely this is satire
TBF .. right now if he wants to come here via a trade he's a spud .. and he if he agrees to come and a trade is made .. he'll be AA next year
True, a classic BigFootyism
I don’t mind Cox as a player at all, I just question whether his type and quality of player is worth giving up valuable draft collateral for this year, when he’s a FA next year
- Feb 2, 2016
- 2,977
- 2,504
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Denver Broncos,Chelsea,wests tigers
Looks like Hayward has rejected your advances and wants to remain at Sydney.
On SM-A515F using BigFooty.com mobile app
On SM-A515F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Source? Someone said it here earlier today but where’d you get it from
Edit: seen what you mean, seems like we’re going after Cox instead though
Last edited:
Has there been some sort of confirmation it’s all bs?
Still waiting for a reputable source to confirm we’ve even made a play for him in the first place tbh
Guessing he’s getting it from hereYet I picture you as the vomit .. lol .. you clown
lol .. x .. twitter wars .. I may have to subscribe
meh .. probably finish up being true though
Similar threads
- Poll
